【摘要】：本文以刑法中的組織行為作為研究對(duì)象。考察國(guó)內(nèi)、外組織犯的立法演變及理論現(xiàn)狀，不難發(fā)現(xiàn)組織犯出現(xiàn)在共犯的法定分類或者狹義共犯的理論探討兩種情形中。在闡述組織犯的構(gòu)成與責(zé)任時(shí)，學(xué)者們將組織行為作為構(gòu)成的客觀要件與刑事責(zé)任認(rèn)定的客觀根據(jù)。本文無(wú)意否定建立在主客觀相統(tǒng)一原則之上的組織犯相關(guān)理論的合理性，只是期望通過(guò)刑法中組織行為這一新視角，反思現(xiàn)有的組織犯理論，進(jìn)而探討實(shí)踐中關(guān)于組織違法或犯罪情形的處理與應(yīng)對(duì)之策。 文章包括五個(gè)部分，共計(jì)39947字。 第一部分：主要介紹組織犯的立法情況并做一定的評(píng)析，提出刑法中的組織行為這一理論范疇；從組織者與被組織者之間的組織關(guān)系角度，深入分析刑法中組織行為的內(nèi)涵與特征，并認(rèn)為具有相當(dāng)?shù)娜烁裰潢P(guān)系的應(yīng)負(fù)刑事責(zé)任的法益侵害性是組織行為的本質(zhì)屬性；從不同視角對(duì)組織行為進(jìn)行類型劃分。 第二部分：重點(diǎn)分析組織行為的成立條件。客觀方面要有相應(yīng)的組織行為及其結(jié)果。組織行為客觀上可表現(xiàn)為組建、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、策劃、指揮行為，也可以表現(xiàn)為指使、雇傭、控制行為；客觀的組織行為要有相應(yīng)的實(shí)施者，具有資源便利條件的單位可以成為組織行為的實(shí)施者；組織行為的實(shí)施者主觀方面要具有組織他人進(jìn)行違法或犯罪行為的故意。 第三部分：主要探討組織行為的實(shí)行化。簡(jiǎn)要地分析實(shí)行行為的實(shí)質(zhì)、類型及其與刑法中組織行為的關(guān)系；重點(diǎn)探討我國(guó)刑法中組織行為實(shí)行化的表現(xiàn)形式。所組織的行為性質(zhì)分為犯罪行為、違法行為與中性行為；實(shí)行行為定型性機(jī)能具有相對(duì)性，組織行為實(shí)行化具有其理論與實(shí)踐根據(jù)。 第四部分：主要分析組織行為的停止形態(tài)。從縱向發(fā)展看，，組織行為存在既遂與未完成的各種樣態(tài)。在共犯性的組織行為上堅(jiān)持共犯從屬性的原則，而針對(duì)實(shí)行性的組織行為則提倡實(shí)質(zhì)的解釋。 第五部分：側(cè)重思考組織行為罪數(shù)形態(tài)中的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題：從繼續(xù)犯視角分析組建、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)犯罪組織行為；組織行為競(jìng)合的處理原則；全面評(píng)價(jià)原則在法定犯罪集團(tuán)中的組織行為上的運(yùn)用等。
[Abstract]:This article regards the organization behavior in the criminal law as the research object. It is not difficult to find out that the legal classification of accomplice or the theory of accomplice in narrow sense can be found in the legislative evolution and present situation of domestic and foreign organized crime. In expounding the constitution and responsibility of organizational crime, the scholars regard organizational behavior as the objective element of constitution and the objective basis of the recognition of criminal responsibility. This paper does not intend to deny the rationality of the related theories of organizational crime based on the principle of unity of subjectivity and objectivity, but hopes to reflect on the existing theories of organizational crime through the new perspective of organizational behavior in criminal law. Then it discusses the handling and countermeasures of the organization illegal or criminal situation in practice. The article consists of five parts, a total of 39947 words. The first part mainly introduces the legislative situation of the organized crime and makes some comments, and puts forward the theory category of the organization behavior in the criminal law, from the angle of the organization relation between the organizer and the organizer, This paper deeply analyzes the connotation and characteristics of organizational behavior in criminal law, and holds that the legal interest infringement of criminal responsibility, which has a considerable relationship of personality dominance, is the essential attribute of organizational behavior, and classifies the organizational behavior from different angles of view. The second part focuses on the analysis of the conditions for the establishment of organizational behavior. Objective aspect should have corresponding organization behavior and its result. Objectively speaking, organizational behavior can be manifested as organizing, leading, planning and directing behavior, as well as directing, employing and controlling behavior; objective organizational behavior should have corresponding implementers, The unit with convenient resources can be the executor of organizational behavior, and the subjective aspect of organizational behavior should have the intention of organizing others to commit illegal or criminal acts. The third part mainly discusses the implementation of organizational behavior. This paper briefly analyzes the essence, types and the relationship between the practice behavior and the organization behavior in the criminal law, and probes into the manifestation of the organization behavior in the criminal law of our country. The nature of the organization's behavior can be divided into criminal behavior, illegal behavior and neutral behavior, and the function of formalizing behavior is relative, and the implementation of organizational behavior has its theoretical and practical basis. The fourth part: mainly analyzes the stop form of the organization behavior. From the perspective of vertical development, organizational behavior has various patterns of accomplished and unfinished. The principle of accomplice is adhered to in the organizational behavior of accomplice, while the interpretation of substance is advocated in view of the practical organizational behavior. The fifth part: focus on thinking about several problems in the number of crimes of organizational behavior: from the perspective of continuing to commit the analysis of the organization, leading the criminal organization, organizational behavior of competing principles of handling; The application of comprehensive evaluation principle in the organizational behavior of statutory criminal groups.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 路軍;組織犯概念諸學(xué)說(shuō)介評(píng)——從組織犯刑事立法出發(fā)的思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年03期

2 王昭振;趙微;;組織犯:詮釋基礎(chǔ)、類型與處罰[J];河北法學(xué);2008年10期

3 賈宇;犯罪故意概念的評(píng)析與重構(gòu)[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年04期

4 儲(chǔ)槐植,汪永樂(lè);再論我國(guó)刑法中犯罪概念的定量因素[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年02期

5 于志剛;;犯罪故意中的認(rèn)識(shí)理論新探[J];法學(xué)研究;2008年04期

6 黎宏;;結(jié)果無(wú)價(jià)值論之展開[J];法學(xué)研究;2008年05期

7 鄧又天,李永升;試論有組織犯罪的概念及其類型[J];法學(xué)研究;1997年06期

8 劉雪梅;;論組織犯的中止[J];邵陽(yáng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期

9 桂夢(mèng)美,宣學(xué)偉;組織犯本體論[J];鐵道警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

10 趙輝;;略論組織犯的存在范圍[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 朱平;刑法實(shí)行行為論[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

2 胡選洪;組織犯研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：2279707