【摘要】：我國刑法中的屬人管轄權(quán)，是指我國基于國籍對我國領(lǐng)域外所實(shí)施的犯罪，依法適用我國刑法追究該公民刑事責(zé)任的權(quán)力。我國現(xiàn)行刑法對于屬人管轄權(quán)的規(guī)定采用無限制的屬人管轄權(quán)，刪除79年刑法中關(guān)于屬人管轄權(quán)的犯罪種類、“雙重犯罪原則”等限制，使得我國刑法屬人管轄權(quán)的范圍極大的擴(kuò)大。 隨著國際交流的日益頻繁，我國公民出國的機(jī)會和數(shù)量急劇增加，在國外犯罪的數(shù)量也大幅度增加。出于各種原因，犯罪行為在犯罪地國總是得不到及時(shí)的責(zé)任追究，因此，擴(kuò)大屬人管轄權(quán)適用范圍一定程度上有利更好的懲罰犯罪。但是，屬人管轄權(quán)行使的不斷頻繁，這勢必會引起犯罪人所屬國的屬人管轄權(quán)與犯罪地國的屬地管轄權(quán)的沖突。因此，如何在保證我國刑事管轄權(quán)的基礎(chǔ)上，有效協(xié)調(diào)因?qū)偃斯茌牂?quán)范圍擴(kuò)大而帶來的問題與沖突便成為了刑法理論與司法實(shí)務(wù)必須要面對的難題。本文主要通過揭示我國現(xiàn)行刑法屬人管轄權(quán)規(guī)定中反映的問題，并從定罪沖突、量刑差異、刑法重復(fù)評價(jià)等三個(gè)角度對我國屬人管轄權(quán)進(jìn)行分析，提出“一個(gè)根本，三個(gè)具體”的對應(yīng)協(xié)調(diào)建議。其中，“一個(gè)根本”指合理縮小屬人管轄權(quán)的適用范圍，“三個(gè)具體”分別是指增加“雙重犯罪原則”的適用，，重視對外國刑法規(guī)定的參考，擴(kuò)大域外判決的承認(rèn)范圍。 本文除了導(dǎo)言和結(jié)語之外，正文共分為三章： 第一章主要是屬人管轄權(quán)概述。具體包括三部分，第一部分為屬人管轄權(quán)的基礎(chǔ)界定，從屬人管轄權(quán)的歷史淵源與發(fā)展歷程、理論依據(jù)、范圍界定等三方面加以展開；第二部分介紹各國刑法中的屬人管轄權(quán)規(guī)定，分為無限制的屬人管轄權(quán)和有限制的屬人管轄權(quán)，并且總結(jié)世界刑法在屬人管轄權(quán)方面的發(fā)展趨勢；第三部分主要介紹我國刑法屬人管轄權(quán)的規(guī)定，并重點(diǎn)揭示規(guī)定中反映的問題，從而為下文的分析與闡述歸納中心問題。 第二章主要是對我國刑法屬人管轄權(quán)存在的現(xiàn)實(shí)矛盾的分析與思考。具體對現(xiàn)行屬人管轄權(quán)制度下存在的定罪沖突愈發(fā)明顯、量刑差異愈發(fā)擴(kuò)大、刑法重復(fù)評價(jià)現(xiàn)象愈發(fā)突出等三個(gè)問題進(jìn)行剖析，分別從上述問題的現(xiàn)實(shí)表現(xiàn)、原因、負(fù)面影響等角度出發(fā)思考我國現(xiàn)行屬人管轄權(quán)制度的不妥之處。 第三章主要是在第二章的分析與思考之上，提出相應(yīng)的協(xié)調(diào)建議。其中針對定罪沖突愈發(fā)明顯的問題，可以通過合理增加“雙重犯罪原則”的適用加以緩和；針對量刑差異愈發(fā)擴(kuò)大的問題，可以通過重視對外國刑法規(guī)定的參考的途徑加以協(xié)調(diào)；針對刑法重復(fù)評價(jià)現(xiàn)象愈發(fā)突出的問題，則可以通過科學(xué)的擴(kuò)大域外判決的承認(rèn)范圍加以解決。最后，筆者還就我國屬人管轄權(quán)存在系列問題的根本原因——采用無限制的屬人管轄權(quán)進(jìn)行闡述，提出要從根本上緩和屬人管轄權(quán)的矛盾，應(yīng)適當(dāng)采用有限制的屬人管轄權(quán)，縮小我國刑法屬人管轄權(quán)的范圍。
[Abstract]:The jurisdiction of people in our country's criminal law refers to the power that our country applies to the criminal responsibility of the citizen according to law based on the crime committed outside the territory of our country based on the nationality. The current criminal law of our country adopts unlimited jurisdiction over the provisions of the jurisdiction of persons, and deletes the categories of crimes in the criminal law of 79 years concerning the jurisdiction of persons. "Dual criminality principle" On the other hand, the scope of the jurisdiction of the criminal law of our country is greatly enlarged. With the increasing international exchange, the number of opportunities and the number of citizens abroad has increased sharply, and the number of crimes committed abroad is also greatly increased For various reasons, crimes committed in the country of the crime are always not held accountable in a timely manner, and therefore, the extension of the scope of application of the human jurisdiction is somewhat advantageous and better A crime. However, the jurisdiction of a person is exercised frequently, which causes the jurisdiction of the person to which the offender belongs and the territorial jurisdiction of the State of the crime. Therefore, on the basis of ensuring the criminal jurisdiction of our country, how to effectively coordinate the problems and conflicts arising from the enlargement of the jurisdiction of the people has become the theoretical and judicial practice of criminal law This article mainly discusses the problems reflected in the jurisdiction of the current criminal law of our country, and analyzes the jurisdiction of China from the three angles of conviction conflict, sentencing difference and repeated evaluation of criminal law. and put forward "a fundamental, three, Corresponding coordination of" specific "Recommendation. wherein" one "" Basic "means the application of reasonable reduction to the jurisdiction of a person Range," Three in particular, refers to the increase of "dual criminality" The application of the principle "attaches importance to the reference to the provisions of foreign criminal law and expands the recognition of extraterritorial judgement." Scope. In addition to the introduction and epilogue, the text It is divided into three chapters: Chapter 1 mainly It is an overview of human jurisdiction. It includes three parts. The first part is divided into three aspects: the basic definition of human jurisdiction, the history of the jurisdiction of the subordinate people, the development course, the theoretical basis, the scope definition, etc. The second part introduces the national criminal law. The third part mainly introduces the provisions of the jurisdiction of the people's jurisdiction of our country, and points out that the criminal law of the world belongs to the jurisdiction of the people. The issues reflected in the provisions, thus providing for the following analysis and The second chapter mainly deals with the existence of the jurisdiction of the criminal law of our country. The analysis and reflection of the realistic contradiction in the existing system of human jurisdiction are more obvious, the difference of sentencing becomes more and more, the repeated evaluation of criminal law is more prominent and so on. On the realistic performance, cause and negative influence of the problem, we think about the present genus in China The wrong place of the system of human's jurisdiction. The third chapter is the analysis of the second chapter. Put forward corresponding coordination suggestions on the basis of thinking. Among them, the recovery of the conviction conflicts there is a clear problem that it may In order to ease the application of the principle of "double criminality" through reasonable increase, the problem of the widening of sentencing differences can be coordinated through the emphasis on the ways of reference in the foreign criminal law, and the problem of repeated evaluation of the criminal law can be expanded through scientific expansion. In the end, the author states that there exist a series of problems in the jurisdiction of the people in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 呂巖峰,李海瀅;國際刑事管轄權(quán)沖突的“適當(dāng)法”觀照——來自國際私法學(xué)的借鑒[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2004年04期

2 陳忠林;我國刑法中的屬人原則[J];法商研究;2004年01期

3 齊文遠(yuǎn),劉代華;完善我國刑法空間效力立法的思考[J];法商研究;2005年01期

4 趙秉志;田宏杰;;中國內(nèi)地與香港刑事管轄權(quán)沖突研究──由張子強(qiáng)案件引發(fā)的思考[J];法學(xué)家;1999年06期

5 陳志軍;;中國刑法適用范圍立法之完善研究[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2011年01期

6 馬呈元;論被動屬人原則[J];公安研究;2003年06期

7 朱志玲;;域外刑事管轄權(quán)的原則與實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

8 張明楷;;國民對國家的忠誠與國家對國民的保護(hù)——屬人主義的理解與適用[J];社會科學(xué);2008年04期

9 何其生;孫慧;;外國公法適用的沖突法路徑[J];武大國際法評論;2011年01期

10 陳興良;禁止重復(fù)評價(jià)研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1994年01期

本文編號：2268831