發(fā)布時間：2018-10-10 17:58

【摘要】：《刑法修正案(八)》對刑法第50條的修改,標(biāo)志著我國刑法建立了死緩限制減刑制度。這項制度不僅呼應(yīng)著我國嚴(yán)格限制死刑、逐步廢除死刑的發(fā)展趨勢,而且調(diào)整了現(xiàn)有的刑罰結(jié)構(gòu),拉開死刑緩期執(zhí)行和有期徒刑之間的實際執(zhí)行刑期的距離,具有深遠(yuǎn)的現(xiàn)實意義。該制度自實施以來,雖然各地中級人民法院陸陸續(xù)續(xù)地開始嘗試著將死緩限制減刑制度投入使用,但是,司法實踐中的適用情況似乎差強(qiáng)人意。究其原因,除了死緩限制減刑制度背后具有價值沖突以外,作為一項新的制度,其制度設(shè)計過于粗糙,框架性原則性的適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn),太過籠統(tǒng),可操作性差。因此,死緩限制減刑制度溯及力的相關(guān)問題、適用的實體條件、適用范圍都值得進(jìn)一步細(xì)化和完善,以達(dá)到調(diào)整現(xiàn)有的刑罰結(jié)構(gòu),貫徹落實“寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)”的刑事政策,減少和控制死刑適用的目的。
[Abstract]:The amendment of the Criminal Law (8) to the amendment of Article 50 of the Criminal Law marks the establishment of the system of deferral and commutation of the sentence in the Criminal Law of our country. This system not only echoes the development trend of strictly restricting the death penalty and gradually abolishing the death penalty in our country, but also adjusts the existing penalty structure and draws back the distance between the suspended execution of the death penalty and the actual sentence of execution of the sentence of imprisonment. It has profound practical significance. Since the implementation of the system, although the intermediate people's courts in various places began to try to put the system of deferral restriction commutation into use one after another, the application of the system in judicial practice seems to be unsatisfactory. As a new system, the design of the system is too rough, the applicable standard of frame principle is too general, and the maneuverability is poor. Therefore, the relevant problems, the applicable substantive conditions, and the scope of application of the system of deferral and limitation of commutation of death sentences are worthy of further refinement and perfection in order to adjust the existing penal structure and implement the criminal policy of "combining leniency with severity". The purpose of reducing and controlling the application of the death penalty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國青年政治學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 張明楷;刑法學(xué)者如何為削減死刑作貢獻(xiàn)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年01期

2 肖中華;我國死緩制度的司法適用及相關(guān)立法評析[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;1999年06期

3 黎宏;;死刑緩期執(zhí)行制度新解[J];法商研究;2009年04期

4 周振想;關(guān)于“死緩制度”的幾個問題[J];中央政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;1994年06期

5 詹兆園;;死緩限制減刑法律適用若干問題研究[J];江西警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年02期

6 吳光俠;周小霖;;指導(dǎo)案例4號《王志才故意殺人案》的理解與參照[J];人民司法;2012年07期

7 馬克昌;論死刑緩期執(zhí)行[J];中國法學(xué);1999年02期

，

本文編號：2262744