高利貸行為的刑法規(guī)制
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-13 16:57
【摘要】：高利貸行為應(yīng)否入罪、如何入罪,須依據(jù)我國現(xiàn)行法律和司法解釋,在準(zhǔn)確界定高利貸行為內(nèi)涵的基礎(chǔ)上,針對普通高利貸和暴利貸兩種不同類型,從形式層面進行民事、行政和刑事的違法性判斷,從實質(zhì)層面進行公平、自由與效率的價值評價和選擇,以尋求高利貸行為入罪的正當(dāng)根據(jù)。普通高利貸具有民事違法性,刑法不宜介入,但可追究催討強索高利貸等衍生行為的刑事責(zé)任;暴利貸屬于從事非法金融業(yè)務(wù)活動的行為,具有行政違法性,但并不符合非法經(jīng)營罪中"違反國家規(guī)定"的前置法條件,因而不構(gòu)成非法經(jīng)營罪,但可通過對催討強索等高利貸衍生行為的刑法認定,追究高利貸者直接實行或參與實施相關(guān)犯罪的刑事責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:Whether or not usury should be incriminated, and how to incriminate, according to the current law and judicial interpretation of our country, on the basis of accurately defining the connotation of usury, and aiming at two different types of usury, ordinary usury and profiteering loan, civil affairs should be carried out from the formal level. To judge the illegality of administration and criminal law, we should evaluate and choose the value of fairness, freedom and efficiency from the substantive level, in order to seek the proper basis for the crime of usury. Ordinary usury has civil illegality, criminal law should not intervene, but it can be investigated for criminal liability for derivative behavior such as strong loan usury. Profiteering loan is an act of engaging in illegal financial business and has administrative illegality. However, it does not meet the conditions of "violating the state regulations" in the crime of illegal operation, and therefore does not constitute the crime of illegal operation. However, it can be recognized by the criminal law of usury derivative such as demanding strong claims. To investigate the criminal liability of loan sharks who directly commit or participate in the commission of related crimes.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學(xué)研究生教育院;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大招標(biāo)項目“涉信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)違法犯罪行為法律規(guī)制研究”(14ZDB147) 上海市哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)規(guī)劃項目“信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)服務(wù)的刑事規(guī)制研究”(2016) 上海市高校一流學(xué)科(華東政法大學(xué)刑法學(xué))建設(shè)計劃項目
【分類號】：D924.3
本文編號：2241784
[Abstract]:Whether or not usury should be incriminated, and how to incriminate, according to the current law and judicial interpretation of our country, on the basis of accurately defining the connotation of usury, and aiming at two different types of usury, ordinary usury and profiteering loan, civil affairs should be carried out from the formal level. To judge the illegality of administration and criminal law, we should evaluate and choose the value of fairness, freedom and efficiency from the substantive level, in order to seek the proper basis for the crime of usury. Ordinary usury has civil illegality, criminal law should not intervene, but it can be investigated for criminal liability for derivative behavior such as strong loan usury. Profiteering loan is an act of engaging in illegal financial business and has administrative illegality. However, it does not meet the conditions of "violating the state regulations" in the crime of illegal operation, and therefore does not constitute the crime of illegal operation. However, it can be recognized by the criminal law of usury derivative such as demanding strong claims. To investigate the criminal liability of loan sharks who directly commit or participate in the commission of related crimes.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學(xué)研究生教育院;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大招標(biāo)項目“涉信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)違法犯罪行為法律規(guī)制研究”(14ZDB147) 上海市哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)規(guī)劃項目“信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)服務(wù)的刑事規(guī)制研究”(2016) 上海市高校一流學(xué)科(華東政法大學(xué)刑法學(xué))建設(shè)計劃項目
【分類號】：D924.3
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 何勇;談?wù)劯呃J問題[J];河北法學(xué);1987年02期
2 耿景儀;;以刑法武器懲治高利貸犯罪的建議[J];法律學(xué)習(xí)與研究;1990年03期
3 韓偉;;論高利貸行為的刑法規(guī)制[J];市場周刊(理論研究);2011年11期
4 吳波;郭大磊;;對高利貸行為的犯罪學(xué)思考[J];犯罪研究;2013年05期
5 趙進一;;法槌重擊高利貸[J];檢察風(fēng)云;2011年08期
6 張素敏;王淑華;;高利貸活動引發(fā)不穩(wěn)定問題的調(diào)研報告[J];中國檢察官;2014年03期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 秦正發(fā);高利貸的刑法規(guī)制研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 方益花;高利貸犯罪問題研究[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2015年
2 李國棟;論增設(shè)高利貸罪[D];廣東財經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年
，本文編號：2241784
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2241784.html
教材專著
