【摘要】：早在2011年初，《刑法修正案（八）》的出臺就曾引起人們對貪污賄賂犯罪死刑是否正當?shù)霓q論。黨和國家在十八大之后繼續(xù)嚴厲打擊貪污腐敗犯罪，眾多貪腐官員紛紛落馬，不乏有人被依法判處死刑。這再次引起了貪污賄賂犯罪死刑存廢問題的爭論。 目前，針對貪污賄賂犯罪死刑的存廢主要有三種觀點。第一種觀點是主張立即廢除貪污賄賂犯罪死刑；第二種觀點是主張保持乃至增添貪污賄賂犯罪死刑罪名的數(shù)量；第三種觀點是主張現(xiàn)階段暫時保留貪污賄賂犯罪的死刑配置，與此同時，采用嚴格限制其適用條件、保證死刑程序嚴格執(zhí)行的方式，對貪污賄賂犯罪的死刑逐步廢除。 筆者基于階段性保留論的立場來分析貪污賄賂犯罪死刑存廢問題。首先，，以目前我國刑法對貪污賄賂犯罪死刑的設(shè)置狀況為出發(fā)點，探討其產(chǎn)生的原因與存在的問題；其次，通過闡明貪污賄賂犯罪死刑應否存在的幾種觀點，深入分析現(xiàn)階段我國應該保留其死刑配置的原因。最后，為了貪污賄賂犯罪死刑更好地被適用，筆者主張發(fā)展完善現(xiàn)有的防貪懲腐法律法規(guī)，并且充分利用和發(fā)展死刑緩期執(zhí)行制度。
[Abstract]:As early as 2011, the introduction of the Criminal Law Amendment (VIII) had aroused debate about the death penalty for corruption and bribery. After the 18th National Congress, the Party and the state continued to crack down on corruption and corruption, many corrupt officials have lost their horses, and some have been sentenced to death in accordance with the law. This once again led to the corruption and bribery of the death penalty on the issue of abolition. At present, there are three views on the death penalty for corruption and bribery. The first is to advocate the immediate abolition of the death penalty for corruption and bribery crimes; the second is to maintain or even increase the number of death penalty charges for corruption and bribery crimes; and the third is to maintain the death penalty allocation for corruption and bribery crimes for the time being. At the same time, the death penalty for corruption and bribery is gradually abolished by strictly restricting its application conditions and ensuring the strict execution of the death penalty procedure. Based on the stage reservation theory, the author analyzes the death penalty for corruption and bribery. First of all, from the point of view of the establishment of the death penalty for corruption and bribery crime in the criminal law of our country, this paper discusses the causes and existing problems of the death penalty; secondly, by clarifying whether the death penalty should exist in the crime of corruption and bribery, there are several viewpoints on whether or not the death penalty should exist. Deeply analyze the reason why our country should keep its death penalty allocation at this stage. Finally, in order to better apply the death penalty for corruption and bribery, the author proposes to develop and perfect the existing laws and regulations of corruption prevention and punishment, and to make full use of and develop the system of suspending execution of the death penalty.
【學位授予單位】：南昌大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.392

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周光權(quán);;《刑法修正案(八)》的深度解讀[J];中國司法;2011年05期

2 彭新林;;經(jīng)濟犯罪中死刑生命空間的新思考[J];福建法學;2009年01期

3 孫國祥;;我國懲治貪污賄賂犯罪刑事政策模式的應然選擇[J];法商研究;2010年05期

4 曲新久;推動廢除死刑:刑法學者的責任[J];法學;2003年04期

5 周永坤;;為反貪賄,應廢除貪墨罪死刑[J];法學;2006年08期

6 華學文;;論貪污受賄罪的死刑存廢問題[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2011年10期

7 杜華;;貪污賄賂犯罪適用死刑問題研究[J];法制與社會;2008年31期

8 王強軍;;死刑不引渡不應成為“倒逼”國內(nèi)廢除死刑的理由[J];華東政法大學學報;2011年04期

9 李煒;;貪污賄賂犯罪死刑制度爭議問題研究[J];河北法學;2012年06期

10 王振國;;貪污受賄罪死刑廢止的分析[J];青春歲月;2011年16期

本文編號：2206460