論詐騙罪中被害人的自我答責(zé)
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-26 10:40
【摘要】：以“自我決定”為依據(jù)的“自我答責(zé)”是刑事客觀歸責(zé)原則之一。將被害人自我答責(zé)的一般原理與詐騙罪構(gòu)成要件相結(jié)合，能夠強化刑法總則和分則聯(lián)系，促進刑法理論的縱深發(fā)展。要成立被害人自我答責(zé)，被害人必須具備適格的答責(zé)能力、答責(zé)對象和答責(zé)時間。在詐騙罪中，只有存在有效的被害人自我答責(zé)才能阻卻詐騙罪成立。由于被害人自我答責(zé)的對象只能是被害人自身法益，為此，對于他人、國家、社會法益進行答責(zé)是無效的。 本文除引言外，共三章，，現(xiàn)將各章節(jié)主要內(nèi)容概述如下： 第一章是被害人自我答責(zé)及相關(guān)刑法問題。該章節(jié)主要由三個部分構(gòu)成，第一部分介紹被害人自我答責(zé)理論；第二部分介紹被害人自我答責(zé)理論依據(jù)；第三部分介紹被害人自我答責(zé)理論與近似理論的異同。 第二章是被害人自我答責(zé)詐騙罪中的運用。該章節(jié)主要由三部分構(gòu)成，第一部分主要論述詐騙罪中被害人自我答責(zé)的成立要件；第二部分介紹詐騙罪中被害人自我答責(zé)的法律效果；第三部分介紹詐騙罪中被害人自我答責(zé)理論排除適用。 第三章是被害人自我答責(zé)在詐騙陷阱中的運用。該章節(jié)主要由三個部分組成，第一部分論述詐騙陷阱中被害人自我答責(zé)的意思表示形式；第二部分闡述在詐騙陷阱中被害人的自我答責(zé)對行為人行為的影響；第三部分是從被害人自我答責(zé)角度分析詐騙陷阱中詐騙罪的既遂與未遂。
[Abstract]:Self-responsibility based on self-decision is one of the principles of objective imputation of criminal responsibility. Combining the general principle of the victim's self-answer with the constitutive elements of the crime of fraud can strengthen the connection between the general principles and sub-rules of criminal law and promote the deep development of the theory of criminal law. In order to establish the victim's self-responsibility, the victim must have appropriate responsibility. responsibilitiesand responsibility. In the crime of fraud, only the existence of effective victim self-accountability can prevent the establishment of the crime of fraud. Since the victim can only answer for the victim's own legal interests, for others and the country, the social legal interest is invalid. In addition to the introduction, there are three chapters. The main contents of each chapter are summarized as follows: the first chapter is victim self-responsibility and related criminal law issues. This chapter is mainly composed of three parts: the first part introduces the theory of victim's self-answer; the second part introduces the theoretical basis of victim's self-answer; the third part introduces the similarities and differences between the theory of victim's self-responsibility and the approximate theory. The second chapter is the application of the crime of self-answering the crime of fraud. The chapter is mainly composed of three parts, the first part mainly discusses the constitutive elements of the victim's self-responsibility in the crime of fraud, the second part introduces the legal effect of the victim's self-responsibility in the crime of fraud. The third part introduces the application of the theory of victim's self-answer in the crime of fraud. Chapter three is the application of victim's self-responsibility in fraud trap. This chapter mainly consists of three parts: the first part discusses the form of the victim's self-responsibility in the fraud trap, the second part expounds the influence of the victim's self-responsibility on the behavior of the perpetrator in the fraud trap. The third part is to analyze the accomplished and attempted crime of fraud in fraud trap from the angle of victim's self-answer.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3
本文編號：2204616
[Abstract]:Self-responsibility based on self-decision is one of the principles of objective imputation of criminal responsibility. Combining the general principle of the victim's self-answer with the constitutive elements of the crime of fraud can strengthen the connection between the general principles and sub-rules of criminal law and promote the deep development of the theory of criminal law. In order to establish the victim's self-responsibility, the victim must have appropriate responsibility. responsibilitiesand responsibility. In the crime of fraud, only the existence of effective victim self-accountability can prevent the establishment of the crime of fraud. Since the victim can only answer for the victim's own legal interests, for others and the country, the social legal interest is invalid. In addition to the introduction, there are three chapters. The main contents of each chapter are summarized as follows: the first chapter is victim self-responsibility and related criminal law issues. This chapter is mainly composed of three parts: the first part introduces the theory of victim's self-answer; the second part introduces the theoretical basis of victim's self-answer; the third part introduces the similarities and differences between the theory of victim's self-responsibility and the approximate theory. The second chapter is the application of the crime of self-answering the crime of fraud. The chapter is mainly composed of three parts, the first part mainly discusses the constitutive elements of the victim's self-responsibility in the crime of fraud, the second part introduces the legal effect of the victim's self-responsibility in the crime of fraud. The third part introduces the application of the theory of victim's self-answer in the crime of fraud. Chapter three is the application of victim's self-responsibility in fraud trap. This chapter mainly consists of three parts: the first part discusses the form of the victim's self-responsibility in the fraud trap, the second part expounds the influence of the victim's self-responsibility on the behavior of the perpetrator in the fraud trap. The third part is to analyze the accomplished and attempted crime of fraud in fraud trap from the angle of victim's self-answer.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳東;期待可能性理論初探[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年05期
2 李希慧;姚龍兵;;論我國刑法中的被害人承諾[J];東方法學(xué);2009年01期
3 車浩;;論刑法上的被害人同意能力[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2008年06期
4 江溯;;日本刑法上的被害人危險接受理論及其借鑒[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年06期
5 王海橋;吳惒光;;刑法中的被害人基本理論界定[J];廣西社會科學(xué);2011年03期
6 徐岱,凌萍萍;被害人承諾之刑法評價[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2004年06期
7 黃芬;;侵權(quán)責(zé)任法中的受害人同意能力[J];暨南學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年02期
8 何秉松;論刑法因果關(guān)系——兼論刑法必然、偶然因果關(guān)系爭論的終結(jié)[J];法學(xué)研究;1994年02期
9 張明楷;論三角詐騙[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年02期
10 黎宏;;被害人承諾問題研究[J];法學(xué)研究;2007年01期
本文編號：2204616
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2204616.html
教材專著
