發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-14 18:51

【摘要】：我國(guó)《刑法修正案(九)》將刑法典第二百三十七條規(guī)定的強(qiáng)制猥褻、侮辱婦女罪修改為強(qiáng)制猥褻、侮辱罪。至此,強(qiáng)制猥褻的對(duì)象擴(kuò)大至他人,而強(qiáng)制侮辱的對(duì)象仍局限于婦女。這一修改的顯著意義在于成年男性的性自主權(quán)將前所未有地得到刑法保護(hù)。但無(wú)論是在理論界還是司法實(shí)踐中,強(qiáng)制猥褻、侮辱罪都暴露出諸多問題亟需解決。本文將采用比較分析法、案例分析法與文獻(xiàn)分析法,對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外的研究成果進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,了解不同時(shí)期不同學(xué)者對(duì)于本罪的認(rèn)識(shí),分別研究本罪呈現(xiàn)的疑難問題。筆者認(rèn)為,研究一個(gè)罪名具體的犯罪構(gòu)成要件,首先要準(zhǔn)確把握刑法設(shè)置此罪名的目的,明確刑法所要保護(hù)的法益。因此文章首先通過案例引出問題,對(duì)比域內(nèi)域外對(duì)此持有的不同看法,來研究強(qiáng)制猥褻、侮辱罪所保護(hù)的法益。強(qiáng)制猥褻、侮辱行為是對(duì)狹義性交以外的性自主權(quán)的侵犯,這種性自主權(quán)是邊緣性行為的自主決定權(quán),因此本罪所保護(hù)的法益正是他人邊緣性行為的自主決定權(quán)。在探究本罪在客觀方面的表現(xiàn)形式時(shí),筆者認(rèn)為,這種猥褻侮辱行為是對(duì)一切邊緣性行為自主權(quán)侵犯。因而需要分析本罪中“猥褻”行為與“侮辱”行為的關(guān)系。在對(duì)本罪主觀方面進(jìn)行研究時(shí),通過實(shí)踐中發(fā)生的案件為例,探討司法實(shí)踐中將本罪作為傾向犯所帶來的問題,在闡明本罪并非傾向犯的同時(shí),對(duì)行為是否構(gòu)成犯罪、構(gòu)成何種犯罪作出正確界定。本文還將通過案例引出本罪與強(qiáng)奸罪的罪間界限問題,通過研究刑法所保護(hù)的法益、行為人的行為方式以及主觀目的等多個(gè)方面對(duì)二罪進(jìn)行比較,合理的界分二罪之間的關(guān)系,以期給司法實(shí)踐帶來一些啟發(fā)。
[Abstract]:The Criminal Law Amendment (9) modifies the crime of forcible indecency and insulting women as the crime of compulsory indecency and insulting as stipulated in Article 237 of the Criminal Code. At this point, the object of forced indecency extends to others, while the object of forced insult is still confined to women. The significance of this amendment is that the sexual autonomy of adult men will be protected by criminal law as never before. However, in theory and judicial practice, the crime of compulsory indecency and insult exposes many problems that need to be solved. This paper will use comparative analysis, case analysis and literature analysis, comparative analysis of domestic and foreign research results, to understand the different periods of understanding of the crime of different scholars, respectively, to study the problems presented by this crime. The author believes that to study the specific elements of a crime, first of all, it is necessary to accurately grasp the purpose of setting up the crime in criminal law, and make clear the legal interests to be protected by the criminal law. Therefore, the article first through the case leads to the question, contrasts the domain outside holds the different view to this, studies the compulsory indecent assault, insults the legal interest which protects. Compulsory indecency and insult is the infringement of sexual autonomy other than narrow sexual intercourse, which is the independent decision of marginal sexual behavior, so the legal interest protected by this crime is the independent decision of others' marginal sexual behavior. In exploring the objective manifestations of this crime, the author believes that this kind of indecent and insulting behavior is an infringement on the autonomy of all marginal acts. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the relationship between obscenity and insults in this crime. In the study of the subjective aspect of the crime, through the practice of cases as an example, to explore the judicial practice of this crime as a tendency to commit the problem, in order to clarify that the crime is not inclined to commit at the same time, whether the act constitutes a crime, What kind of crime constitutes a correct definition. This paper also leads to the boundary between this crime and the crime of rape through the case, through the study of the legal interests protected by the criminal law, the behavior mode of the perpetrator and the subjective purpose and so on, carries on the comparison to the two crimes, reasonable boundary divides the two crimes between the relations. In order to bring some inspiration to the judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黨日紅;;關(guān)于強(qiáng)制猥褻、侮辱罪的認(rèn)定[J];中華女子學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年04期

2 趙俊甫;;猥褻犯罪審判實(shí)踐中若干爭(zhēng)議問題探究——兼論《刑法修正案(九)》對(duì)猥褻犯罪的修改[J];法律適用;2016年07期

3 汪雪城;;新強(qiáng)制猥褻罪的法理解讀和規(guī)范評(píng)價(jià)——兼評(píng)《刑法修正案(九)》第十三條第一款之規(guī)定[J];福建法學(xué);2016年02期

4 陳家林;;《刑法修正案(九)》修正后的強(qiáng)制猥褻、侮辱罪解析[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年03期

5 張明楷;;也談客觀歸責(zé)理論 兼與周光權(quán)、劉艷紅教授商榷[J];中外法學(xué);2013年02期

6 張明楷;;結(jié)果無(wú)價(jià)值論的法益觀 與周光權(quán)教授商榷[J];中外法學(xué);2012年01期

7 周光權(quán);;行為無(wú)價(jià)值論的法益觀[J];中外法學(xué);2011年05期

8 陳興良;;客觀未遂論的濫觴——一個(gè)學(xué)術(shù)史的考察[J];法學(xué)家;2011年04期

9 張明楷;;實(shí)質(zhì)解釋論的再提倡[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2010年04期

10 張明楷;;規(guī)范的構(gòu)成要件要素[J];法學(xué)研究;2007年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張s，

本文編號(hào)：2183793