論非法吸收公眾存款罪的司法認(rèn)定
[Abstract]:In recent years, the crime rate of illegally absorbing public deposits has been increasing year by year, the amount of crime is increasing, the number of people involved is more and more, and the scope is more and more extensive. In judicial practice, there are also qualitative deviations, such as heavy punishment for misdemeanours, misdemeanours and so on. "Non-sucking crime" has also become the target of public criticism and has been widely criticized by scholars and the public. On the one hand, the reason is that the crime is blank, the stipulation is vague, and the characteristic of "pocket crime"; on the other hand, the crime forms and means are constantly renovated, and gradually extended to the network, which further increases the difficulty of the crime. In this paper, the author will face the dispute, divided into four chapters to discuss the crime of illegal absorption of public deposits judicial determination. The first chapter of the article starts from the constitutive elements of the crime of illegally absorbing deposits from the public. Combined with the interpretation of some problems in the application of the law in criminal cases involving illegal fund-raising issued by the Supreme people's Court, this paper concretely analyzes the difficulties in the identification of the crime of illegally absorbing deposits from the public in practice. It not only explains the influence of the funds and the use of the funds on the conviction and sentencing, but also clarifies the nature of the "depositors" who are controversial. The second chapter mainly discusses the manifestation of the crime of illegally absorbing deposits from the public. This paper compares the new criminal behavior derived from the Internet model in recent years with that of the traditional crime of illegally absorbing public deposits, through the analysis of typical cases. This paper sums up the new characteristics of the crime of illegally absorbing deposits from the public under the mode of "Internet", which is of great significance to the judicial practice. In the third chapter, the author innovatively studies the special form of the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits, including the constitution of the accomplices of the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits. The argument between the behavior crime and the result crime and the incomplete form of the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits. The fourth chapter discusses the problem of criminal connection in the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits. It is not appropriate for judicial practice departments to adopt the method of "first sentence before people" when dealing with illegal cases of taking deposits from the public, and it is easy to complicate the case improperly. In addition, this chapter also provides some solutions to the problem of the return of funds raised in cases of illegal absorption of public deposits.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:西南科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:D924.3
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳攻;;瀆職罪——非物質(zhì)性損失司法認(rèn)定[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年09期
2 趙豐琳,史寶倫;共犯過限的司法認(rèn)定[J];中國(guó)律師;2000年09期
3 趙建星;案發(fā)前退回賄賂行為的司法認(rèn)定[J];檢察實(shí)踐;2003年03期
4 鄧宇瓊;損害商業(yè)信譽(yù)、商品聲譽(yù)罪的司法認(rèn)定[J];吉林公安高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期
5 吳訪非,賈艷婷,公民;巨額財(cái)產(chǎn)來源不明罪的司法認(rèn)定[J];沈陽建筑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期
6 薛曉衛(wèi);試論受賄與接受饋贈(zèng)的司法認(rèn)定[J];人民檢察;2005年16期
7 王廣軍;淺析損害商業(yè)信譽(yù)、商品聲譽(yù)罪司法認(rèn)定中的幾個(gè)問題[J];檢察實(shí)踐;2005年04期
8 余波;周文志;;為親友非法牟利罪的司法認(rèn)定[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2006年04期
9 張軍;;非法占用農(nóng)用地罪的司法認(rèn)定[J];中國(guó)土地;2006年05期
10 張亞;劉穎;;強(qiáng)迫交易罪司法認(rèn)定中的幾個(gè)主要問題探討[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年08期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條
1 劉孝暉;;芻議立功的司法認(rèn)定[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇(2008年第4輯)[C];2008年
2 程林森;;論“形跡可疑”型自首的司法認(rèn)定[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇(2008年第2輯)[C];2008年
3 孔建祥;;“第三者”、“車上人員”在機(jī)動(dòng)車輛第三者責(zé)任險(xiǎn)中的角色轉(zhuǎn)換和司法認(rèn)定[A];浙江省2011年保險(xiǎn)法學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2011年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 王磊;入戶盜竊之司法認(rèn)定[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2012年
2 金曉麗;拒不支付勞動(dòng)報(bào)酬罪的司法認(rèn)定[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2012年
3 伍靜妍;為奪商標(biāo)“獨(dú)占”權(quán)諸葛釀克隆“酸酸乳”司法認(rèn)定[N];第一財(cái)經(jīng)日?qǐng)?bào);2007年
4 尤忠華 池仲旺;對(duì)添加曾用名行為的司法認(rèn)定[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2012年
5 南通市檢察院 何雪琴;利用影響力受賄罪的司法認(rèn)定[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2012年
6 戴小霞;輪奸行為的司法認(rèn)定[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2013年
7 河南省漯河市郾城區(qū)人民法院 河南省漯河市中級(jí)人民法院 劉元敏 齊江濤 張永輝;假冒食品十倍賠償?shù)乃痉ㄕJ(rèn)定[N];人民法院報(bào);2013年
8 李忠正 何爽;商業(yè)拆遷中共同受賄的司法認(rèn)定[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2014年
9 上海對(duì)外貿(mào)易學(xué)院 楊宏芹 上海市高級(jí)人民法院 朱鐵軍;徇私舞弊不移交刑事案件罪司法認(rèn)定中的若干問題[N];人民法院報(bào);2013年
10 王燕玉 周文;江南“五彩”商標(biāo)第一個(gè)戴上桂冠[N];宜興日?qǐng)?bào);2007年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 劉玉平;論交通肇事罪的司法認(rèn)定與立法完善[D];華南理工大學(xué);2015年
2 金逸帆;背信損害上市公司利益罪探析[D];上海大學(xué);2015年
3 劉婷;強(qiáng)迫交易罪司法認(rèn)定中的疑難問題研究[D];新疆大學(xué);2015年
4 許偉斌;論搶劫罪的司法認(rèn)定[D];華南理工大學(xué);2016年
5 許騰翔;新類型盜竊罪司法認(rèn)定若干問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年
6 王夢(mèng)思;馳名商標(biāo)使用的法律規(guī)則[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2015年
7 唐悄若;論運(yùn)輸毒品罪共同犯罪的司法認(rèn)定[D];云南大學(xué);2015年
8 任昱佳;巨額財(cái)產(chǎn)來源不明罪司法認(rèn)定問題研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2016年
9 胥曉娟;非法吸收公眾存款罪的司法認(rèn)定[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年
10 梁艷;強(qiáng)奸罪若干問題探究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2015年
,本文編號(hào):2177801
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2177801.html