【摘要】：十八大以來,我國反腐工作不斷推向深處。國家工作人員作為我國社會主義建設的一個重要主體,國家工作人員利用職務便利將公共財物占為己有的犯罪行為不僅侵害了財產(chǎn)權,也侵害了職務的廉潔性。在對貪污賄賂犯罪加強執(zhí)法和司法查處力度的同時,由于貪污賄賂犯罪的立法問題導致的在司法過程中的認定上存在著諸如犯罪主體的不當擴大、刑罰量刑幅度較大、刑罰處罰較輕等問題。如果不能有效地解決貪污罪的立法問題,不僅不利于我國當前反腐工作的進一步深化,更不利于我國法制建設的推進。 本文第一部分通過對我國貪污罪的立法史進行論述,較為詳細的介紹了我國古代、近代以及當代貪污罪的立法規(guī)定的發(fā)展,并著重對1997年刑法關于貪污罪的修改進行了討論；第二部分主要是通過對于當前我國貪污罪犯罪構成方面存在的兩個問題進行了論證,并提出了將“偽造國家公文、證件擔任了國家工作人員”從貪污罪犯罪主體中排除,以及將“公務行為高消費”納入貪污罪行為類型兩個觀點,并對提出的觀點進行了必要的討論；第三部分主要通過將貪污罪與盜竊罪這一“官盜”與“民盜”在法定刑上的區(qū)別,對貪污罪法定刑的配置進行了討論,并在此基礎之上提出了筆者的四點具體構想。
[Abstract]:Since the 18th National Congress, China's anti-corruption work has been pushed to the depths. As an important subject in the socialist construction of our country, the state functionaries' crime of taking public property as their own by taking advantage of their duties not only infringes on property rights, but also infringes on the integrity of their posts. While strengthening the law enforcement and judicial investigation and punishment of corruption and bribery crimes, due to the legislative problems of corruption and bribery crimes, such as the improper expansion of the subject of the crime, the penalty and sentencing range is relatively large. The penalty is lighter and so on. If the legislation of corruption crime can not be solved effectively, it will not only be unfavorable to the further deepening of anti-corruption work in our country, but also unfavorable to the advancement of our country's legal system construction. The first part of this paper discusses the legislative history of the corruption crime in China, introduces in detail the development of the legislative provisions of the corruption crime in ancient, modern and contemporary China, and emphatically discusses the revision of the embezzlement crime in the Criminal Law of 1997. The second part mainly discusses the two problems existing in the constitution of corruption crime in our country, and puts forward that "forgery of state document and certificate as state functionary" should be excluded from the subject of corruption crime. As well as the "high consumption of official conduct" into the corruption crime type of two views, and put forward the point of view to carry on the necessary discussion; The third part mainly through the embezzlement crime and the theft this "official theft" and "the people theft" in the legal punishment difference, has carried on the discussion to the embezzlement crime legal punishment disposition, and has put forward the author's four concrete ideas on this foundation.
【學位授予單位】：揚州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.392

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 陳正云;罪犯的犯罪決策的經(jīng)濟分析[J];法律科學(西北政法學院學報);1996年06期

2 王海俠;;我國貪污罪與盜竊罪法定刑配置之比較[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2010年02期

3 翟長璽;貪污罪的法定刑研究[J];河北法學;2002年01期

4 董邦俊,唐子艷,楊劍;我國古代貪污罪立法的考察及反思[J];湖北警官學院學報;2005年02期

5 白建軍;;裸刑均值的意義[J];法學研究;2010年06期

6 楊方泉,周菊;貪污罪立法的歷史淵源[J];中山大學學報論叢;2002年06期

7 張會永;;新時期貪污賄賂犯罪防控問題研究——基于法經(jīng)濟學視角的實證分析[J];河南工業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2012年04期

，

本文編號：2177548