【摘要】：根據(jù)《刑法修正案(八)》的規(guī)定,入戶盜竊構(gòu)成盜竊罪,既不受數(shù)額的限制,也不受次數(shù)的限制,至此入戶盜竊被明文規(guī)定在刑法中。入戶盜竊是一種嚴(yán)重危害社會(huì)的行為,不但侵犯了公民的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán),還侵犯了公民的人身權(quán)和住宅安寧權(quán)�！皯簟笔枪癜采砹⒚�,是繁衍生息之地,是存放財(cái)物之處,也是公民防御和抵御危險(xiǎn)的最后一道屏障。如果此場所遭到侵犯,公民的物質(zhì)生活不但遭到破壞,精神生活也會(huì)蒙受巨大的損失,因此法律必須給予充分的保護(hù)。入戶盜竊入罪是我國法治社會(huì)不斷進(jìn)步維護(hù)國家社會(huì)穩(wěn)定的表現(xiàn),也是積極響應(yīng)人民群眾呼聲的表現(xiàn)。《刑法修正案(八)》把入戶盜竊納入盜竊罪的基本行為模式之一是基于更有力地打擊和遏制這種犯罪的考量,為了更好的保護(hù)公民的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)、人身權(quán)和住宅安寧權(quán)。 本文從入戶盜竊的立法目的著手對(duì)入戶盜竊中“戶”的范圍進(jìn)行研究,認(rèn)為入戶盜竊中的“戶”指的是具有供他人家庭生活、提供權(quán)利保障、帶來生活安定,并且與外界相對(duì)隔離、能夠排除他人進(jìn)入的場所。入戶盜竊中的“戶”具有四個(gè)特征：封閉性、私密性、排他性、家居性。家居性是“戶”的核心特征、靈魂特征；封閉性是“戶”的場所特征；而私密性和排他性則為“戶”的權(quán)利特征。對(duì)于司法實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的一些特殊場所是否可以認(rèn)定為入戶盜竊中“戶”的范圍,也是本文重點(diǎn)討論的地方。由于特殊場所并非像居民住宅那樣承載的完全是飲食起居的功能,因此必須要具體問題具體分析。筆者認(rèn)為還應(yīng)從“戶”的本質(zhì)特征上去考慮,第一,是否是居民日常生活的場所,第二,是否是一個(gè)能夠提供個(gè)體私生活的安寧的場所。隨著社會(huì)的發(fā)展,“戶”的新的形式也可能不斷的出現(xiàn),爭議也可能會(huì)出現(xiàn),筆者認(rèn)為只要結(jié)合“戶”的四個(gè)特征,再輔以案件本身的特性,判斷是否屬于入戶盜竊中的“戶”的問題就會(huì)迎刃而解。
[Abstract]:According to the provisions of the Criminal Law Amendment (8), burglary constitutes the crime of larceny, which is neither limited by the amount nor limited by the number of times. So far, burglary has been expressly stipulated in the Criminal Law. Burglary is a serious act that harms the society. It not only infringes on the property rights of citizens, but also infringes on their personal rights and the right to peaceful residence. "Household" is a place where citizens live, where they multiply, where property is stored, and as the last barrier for citizens to defend themselves against danger. If the site is violated, the material life of citizens will not only be destroyed, but also the spiritual life will suffer great losses, so the law must give adequate protection. The crime of burglary is the manifestation of our country's society under the rule of law, which is constantly advancing and maintaining the social stability of the country. It is also a manifestation of responding positively to the voice of the masses. One of the basic behavior patterns of incorporating burglary into the crime of burglary is to better protect the property rights of citizens on the basis of more effective consideration of cracking down and containing such crimes. Personal and residential rights. Based on the legislative purpose of burglary, this paper studies the scope of "household" in burglary, and holds that the "household" in burglary refers to the provision of family life for others, to provide protection of rights, and to bring stability to life. And relative isolation with the outside world, can exclude others into the place. The "household" in the burglary has four characteristics: closed, private, exclusive and household. Household is the core characteristic of "household", soul characteristic; closeness is the place characteristic of "household"; privacy and exclusiveness are the right characteristic of "household". Whether some special places in judicial practice can be regarded as the scope of "households" in burglary is also discussed in this paper. Because the special place does not carry the function of eating and drinking and living like the resident residence, it must be analyzed concretely. The author thinks that the essential characteristics of "households" should be considered as follows: first, whether it is a place of daily life for residents, and second, whether it is a place of tranquillity that can provide private life for individuals. With the development of the society, new forms of "households" may also appear and disputes may arise. The author thinks that as long as the four characteristics of "households" are combined with the characteristics of the case itself, Judging whether it belongs to the "door" problem of burglary will be solved easily.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈少杰;;對(duì)入戶盜竊的法律思考[J];安順師范高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版);2006年02期

2 何雙全;李劍軍;;“入戶搶劫”之“戶”的認(rèn)定——以商住合一場所為視角[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2011年11期

3 周莉;;“入戶盜竊”立法修正解讀[J];河北公安警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

4 張永紅;;“入戶搶劫”新論[J];河北法學(xué);2006年11期

5 袁劍湘;;論入戶搶劫中“戶”的界定——兼論入戶時(shí)的犯罪目的[J];河北法學(xué);2010年04期

6 羅娟娟;張勇輝;;入戶搶劫之“戶”的認(rèn)定[J];今日南國(理論創(chuàng)新版);2008年02期

7 李璐;張德嵩;;入戶盜竊行為的認(rèn)定[J];中國檢察官;2013年04期

8 曾憲文;;淺議刑法規(guī)定的“入戶搶劫”[J];企業(yè)家天地;2006年09期

9 曹金娟;;論“入戶搶劫”中的戶[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2010年S9期

10 李樂;;入戶搶劫的認(rèn)定[J];市場周刊(理論研究);2013年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2168201