【摘要】：試圖用德、日的行為共同說來解釋我國刑法規(guī)定的共同犯罪,不僅是行不通的路徑,而且其理論根據(jù)也不可靠。我國刑法規(guī)定的共同犯罪之所以不能用行為共同說來解釋,歸根到底是因為行為共同說是區(qū)分正犯與共犯的區(qū)分制犯罪參與體系的產(chǎn)物,而我國刑法采取的是不區(qū)分正犯與共犯的單一正犯體系。德、日刑法中的共同正犯或共犯必須在定罪階段(犯罪論層次)確定,而我國刑法中的共同犯罪則是在量刑(處罰)階段才涉及的問題。
[Abstract]:It is not only an unworkable path but also a unreliable theoretical basis to try to explain the joint crime stipulated by the criminal law of our country with the common theory of Germany and Japan. The reason why the joint crime stipulated in the criminal law of our country cannot be explained by the theory of joint act is, in the final analysis, because the common theory of conduct is the product of the system of distinguishing the principal offender from the accomplice. The criminal law of our country adopts a single principal crime system which does not distinguish between principal offender and accomplice. The joint principal offender or accomplice in the criminal law of Germany and Japan must be determined at the stage of conviction (crime theory level), while the joint crime in our criminal law is a problem in the stage of sentencing (punishment).
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)刑事法律科學(xué)研究中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學(xué)重點研究基地重大項目(16JD820018)“犯罪參與基本問題研究”
【分類號】：D924.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 閻二鵬;;共犯本質(zhì)論之我見——兼議行為共同說之提倡[J];中國刑事法雜志;2010年01期

2 徐若瑤;;對共犯本質(zhì)學(xué)說的反思[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年05期

3 陳斯?jié)?;行為共同說視角下的共犯故意[J];青年與社會;2013年07期

4 孫s，

本文編號：2164834