【摘要】：隨著市場經濟的逐步發(fā)展，勞動力市場也愈來愈興旺。但是，因勞動力市場的日益壯大，勞務糾紛、用工單位“惡意欠薪”的現(xiàn)象頻頻發(fā)生。為了打擊“惡意欠薪”、嚴重擾亂勞動力市場秩序的行為，2011年《刑法修正案（八）》第四十一條增加規(guī)定了拒不支付勞動報酬罪，將“惡意欠薪”正式寫入刑法。拒不支付勞動報酬罪的入刑，標志著我國對勞動者最大限度的保護，用法律的最后一道防線——刑法，保障著勞動者的合法權益。 立法者將拒不支付勞動報酬罪寫入《刑法》，即侵犯財產罪一章中，作為刑法第276條（非法經營罪）之一，非法經營的犯罪對象是社會主義市場經濟秩序，該罪同樣嚴重擾亂了社會主義市場經濟秩序，侵犯市場經濟的正常運行，正是因為有極端的案件出現(xiàn)，使得其他無良的用工單位也紛紛效仿，造成市場的經濟秩序混亂。將其納入該章的目的是拒不支付勞動報酬犯罪已經與詐騙罪、侵占罪等侵犯他人財產性犯罪一樣，嚴重侵害了他人的財產利益。 拒不支付勞動報酬罪的出臺是國家不得不使用強制力約束欠薪的行為，該罪看似是刑法可有可無的罪名，，實際上，“惡意欠薪”行為會給勞動力市場甚至整個社會造成巨大的危害。每年勞動者因得不到薪酬而上訪、自殺甚至引發(fā)暴力性事件的案例比比皆是。因此，對于“惡意欠薪”的行為，必須從司法實踐中，發(fā)現(xiàn)其存在的問題并加以改正與完善。 本論文是一篇調研報告，調研數(shù)據來源于L省10個市法院審管辦以及向各市部分法官發(fā)放調查問卷，最終通過匯總、歸納，得出結論，對數(shù)據進行分析。通過調研結論，筆者將本文分成三部分，以實證分析和理論分析的方式，闡述拒不支付勞動報酬犯罪。第一部分，筆者對L省拒不支付勞動報酬犯罪的調研情況進行全面的分析，總結出L省關于發(fā)生本罪的四個特點。第二部分，筆者針對對L省所犯拒不支付勞動報酬罪的調研情況，匯總L省產生拒不支付勞動報酬現(xiàn)象的原因。第三部分，筆者對拒不支付勞動報酬罪的立法存在的缺陷提出觀點，并對該罪目前的現(xiàn)狀提出立法建議。
[Abstract]:With the gradual development of market economy, labor market is more and more prosperous. However, due to the growing labor market and labor disputes, the phenomenon of malevolent wages owed by employers occurs frequently. In order to crack down on "maliciously unpaid wages" and seriously disturb the order of the labor market, Article 41 of the Criminal Law Amendment (VIII) in 2011 provides for the crime of refusing to pay the remuneration for work, and formally enshrines "maliciously unpaid wages" in the Criminal Law. The crime of refusing to pay the remuneration of labor marks the maximum protection of the laborer in our country, and the criminal law, the last line of defense of the law, ensures the legitimate rights and interests of the laborer. The lawmaker wrote the crime of refusing to pay the remuneration of labor into the Criminal Law, that is, the crime of infringing on property. As one of the 276th (the crime of illegal operation) of the Criminal Law, the object of the crime of illegal operation is the socialist market economic order. This crime has also seriously disturbed the socialist market economic order and infringed the normal operation of the market economy. It is precisely because of the emergence of extreme cases that other unscrupulous employment units have followed suit, resulting in confusion in the economic order of the market. The purpose of its inclusion in this chapter is that the crime of refusing to pay labor remuneration has infringed upon the property interests of others as well as the crime of fraud, embezzlement and other crimes of infringing upon the property of others. The crime of refusing to pay for labor is the act that the state has to use coercive force to restrain wages in arrears. This crime seems to be an optional crime in criminal law. In fact, Malevolent underpayment will do great harm to the labor market and even to the whole society. Every year workers go to the office without pay, suicides and even violent incidents abound. Therefore, to the behavior of "maliciously owed wages", we must find its problems in judicial practice and correct and perfect it. This paper is a research report, the research data from the L province of 10 municipal courts and the distribution of questionnaires to the judges of each city, finally through the summary, induction, conclusion, analysis of the data. Through the research conclusion, the author divides this article into three parts, and expounds the crime of refusing to pay the labor reward by the way of empirical analysis and theoretical analysis. In the first part, the author makes a comprehensive analysis of the crime of refusing to pay for labor in L province, and summarizes the four characteristics of the crime in L province. In the second part, according to the investigation of the crime of refusing to pay labor remuneration committed in L province, the author summarizes the reasons for the phenomenon of non-payment of labor remuneration in L province. In the third part, the author puts forward his views on the defects of the legislation of the crime of refusing to pay the remuneration for labor, and puts forward some legislative suggestions on the present situation of the crime.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 杜邈;商浩文;;拒不支付勞動報酬罪的司法認定[J];法學雜志;2011年10期

2 劉建軍;吳世行;;“惡意欠薪罪”若干問題分析[J];法制與社會;2011年20期

3 李榮勝;;拒不支付勞動報酬罪若干問題辨析[J];法制與社會;2011年26期

4 李暉;;勞務派遣及其法律規(guī)制——兼論勞動合同法有關條款的完善[J];中國勞動關系學院學報;2009年01期

5 楊冬梅;內地和香港有關欠薪立法的比較研究[J];工會理論與實踐(中國工運學院學報);1998年04期

6 張鎮(zhèn)強;;為“拖欠工資薪酬罪”的提議喝彩[J];法制與經濟;2005年12期

7 齊金金;;“拒不支付勞動報酬罪”的理解和適用[J];石家莊經濟學院學報;2012年03期

8 康均心;吳鳳;;對《刑法修正案(八)》新增的“拒不支付勞動報酬罪”若干問題探討[J];時代法學;2011年05期

9 謝天長;;拒不支付勞動報酬罪的法律適用問題探討[J];北京人民警察學院學報;2011年06期

10 王惠;;我國欠薪防治制度存在的問題及其重構[J];江西社會科學;2010年03期

本文編號：2164535