本文選題：利用影響力受賄罪 + 近親屬��； 參考：《華僑大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：賄賂犯罪是當(dāng)今世界的一個(gè)非常突出的問(wèn)題，為世人所矚目，特別是在現(xiàn)在的中國(guó)，它們幾乎成了社會(huì)的焦點(diǎn)和熱點(diǎn)，是街頭巷尾人們都在談?wù)摰闹饕掝}。并且，賄賂犯罪在近年來(lái)出現(xiàn)了新的變化，不僅愈演愈烈，而且案情也越來(lái)越復(fù)雜，，這主要源于社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展。近年來(lái)，開(kāi)始出現(xiàn)了國(guó)家工作人員的身邊人參與賄賂犯罪的行為，這打破了刑法中受賄犯罪的主體都是國(guó)家工作人員的格局。這些行為在案件中具體表現(xiàn)為他們利用與國(guó)家工作人員的特殊關(guān)系等便利條件去實(shí)施犯罪，但是由于刑法中規(guī)定受賄罪的犯罪主體必須是國(guó)家工作人員，且如果國(guó)家工作人員與身邊人都否認(rèn)他們之間有事前通謀，便不能以受賄罪的共犯處罰國(guó)家工作人員的“身邊人”，根據(jù)當(dāng)時(shí)刑法的規(guī)定，對(duì)這些行為，找不到相應(yīng)的刑罰進(jìn)行制裁，由此造成了嚴(yán)重且惡劣的社會(huì)影響。根據(jù)這一特殊現(xiàn)象的出現(xiàn)，2009年10月《刑法》正式確定了第三百八十八之一條“利用影響力受賄罪”之罪名。但是本罪自頒布實(shí)施以來(lái)，便在理論與實(shí)務(wù)界產(chǎn)生了巨大的爭(zhēng)議，一是由于作為刑法中的一個(gè)新罪名，理論和實(shí)務(wù)界對(duì)其認(rèn)識(shí)還不成熟。二是在利用影響力受賄罪中，出現(xiàn)了模糊性的用語(yǔ)，比如近親屬、關(guān)系密切等，而相關(guān)的司法解釋卻并沒(méi)有對(duì)這些用語(yǔ)進(jìn)行明確，因此，在司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)于此罪的認(rèn)定有很多爭(zhēng)議。 本罪在實(shí)踐中，實(shí)際的判決很少，證據(jù)比較難以收集是其中的一個(gè)原因，而還有一個(gè)比較重要的原因是法條中對(duì)于主體的規(guī)定，一是用語(yǔ)方面比較模糊，二是沒(méi)有進(jìn)行明確。所以筆者創(chuàng)作本文，希望能在各位學(xué)者的研究基礎(chǔ)上，能給司法實(shí)踐領(lǐng)域帶來(lái)些許的幫助。文章共分為三個(gè)部分：第一部分是概述，首先介紹了本罪的相關(guān)的大致問(wèn)題，以此為引子，引出文章的第二章和第三章。第二部分是文章的重點(diǎn)，主要對(duì)該罪中爭(zhēng)議性內(nèi)容比較大的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探討，然后總結(jié)各位學(xué)者的觀點(diǎn)，在各種理論的基礎(chǔ)上，提出筆者本人的觀點(diǎn)。最后一部分是司法建議，希望能在筆者的拙見(jiàn)中，對(duì)相關(guān)的問(wèn)題有所啟示。
[Abstract]:Bribery crime is a very prominent problem in the world today, especially in China, they almost become the focus and hot spot of the society, is the main topic that people are talking about. Moreover, bribery crime has changed in recent years, which not only becomes more and more serious, but also becomes more and more complicated, which is mainly due to the rapid development of social economy. In recent years, the people around the state functionaries began to take part in the crime of bribery, which broke the pattern that the main body of the crime of bribery in criminal law is the state functionary. These acts are specifically manifested in the fact that they make use of the special relations with state functionaries to commit crimes. However, since the criminal law stipulates that the subject of the crime of accepting bribes must be a state functionary, And if both the state functionaries and the people around them deny that there was a prior conspiracy between them, they cannot punish the "people beside them" of state functionaries for complicity in the crime of accepting bribes. According to the provisions of the criminal law at that time, these acts were not punished. The lack of appropriate penalties for sanctions has resulted in serious and adverse social effects. According to the emergence of this special phenomenon, in October 2009, the Criminal Code formally established the crime of "taking bribes by using influence" in Article 388. However, since the promulgation and implementation of this crime, there has been a huge controversy in the theoretical and practical circles. Firstly, as a new crime in the criminal law, the theory and practice of its understanding is not mature. Second, in the crime of taking bribes with influence, there are vague terms, such as close relatives, close relations, etc., but the relevant judicial explanations do not make these terms clear, so, In judicial practice, there is a lot of controversy about the determination of this crime. In practice, the actual judgment is very few, the evidence is difficult to collect is one of the reasons, and there is a more important reason is that the provisions of the law for the subject, one is the use of vague terms, the other is not clear. Therefore, the author of this article, I hope that on the basis of the scholars, can bring some help to the field of judicial practice. The article is divided into three parts: the first part is an overview, first introduced the crime of the general issues, as the introduction, leading to the second and third chapters of the article. The second part is the focus of the article, mainly discusses the controversial content of the crime, and then summarizes the views of the scholars, on the basis of various theories, the author puts forward his own views. The last part is judicial advice, hoping to enlighten the related problems in my humble opinion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.392

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 汪維才;;論影響力交易罪的基本構(gòu)造與轉(zhuǎn)化適用[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年06期

2 王俊梅;;利用影響力受賄罪犯罪主體的爭(zhēng)議梳理及解決路徑[J];北京建筑工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

3 林木;卜建偉;;利用影響力受賄罪主體之探討[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2011年01期

4 梁炯鋒;;試論利用影響力受賄罪的犯罪主體界定[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2011年12期

5 王佳;;小議利用影響力受賄罪的犯罪主體[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年03期

6 楊立平;;利用影響力受賄罪的法律適用[J];傳承;2013年03期

7 王玉杰;;利用影響力受賄罪犯罪主體之界定[J];河南司法警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

8 成愈峰;;論利用影響力受賄罪的主體[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2011年01期

9 萬(wàn)偉嶺;李曉佩;;論利用影響力受賄罪中“關(guān)系密切的人”范圍的理解與適用[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2013年11期

10 姚愛(ài)華;楊書(shū)文;;試論影響力交易罪[J];人民司法;2009年09期

本文編號(hào)：2102387