本文選題：偽基站 + 偽基站犯罪��； 參考：《中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：偽基站案件近幾年來(lái)頻發(fā),其呈現(xiàn)下列特點(diǎn):作案工具科技含量高、操作簡(jiǎn)單、成本低廉;犯罪流動(dòng)性大;共同犯罪分工復(fù)雜、組織間聯(lián)系緊密;頂風(fēng)作案、重復(fù)作案率高;已形成作案產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈。目前行政制裁威懾力不足,刑法規(guī)定滯后,四部委《意見》與《刑法》規(guī)定存在部分適用沖突。關(guān)于偽基站案件有無(wú)罪說和入罪說兩種觀點(diǎn),無(wú)罪說基于刑法謙抑性,現(xiàn)行行政法規(guī)足以規(guī)制偽基站案件;入罪說認(rèn)為偽基站案件社會(huì)危害性較大,侵害電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商利益、危害公共安全、財(cái)產(chǎn)安全等,同時(shí)也是預(yù)防再犯罪的需要。個(gè)人認(rèn)為偽基站案件有刑法規(guī)制的必要,該案件嚴(yán)重侵害刑法保護(hù)的各種法益,成立犯罪不違背刑法謙抑性;結(jié)合《刑法修正案(九)草案》對(duì)偽基站案件的刑法規(guī)制進(jìn)行分析。分析偽基站犯罪構(gòu)成要素之犯罪客體、危害結(jié)果、行為主體,該類案件危害公共安全、威脅公私財(cái)產(chǎn)安全以及個(gè)人信息安全、擾亂市場(chǎng)經(jīng)營(yíng)秩序等;犯罪主體包括自然人、單位,但部分罪名中對(duì)不同主體的追訴標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不同。偽基站犯罪主要構(gòu)成下列幾種罪名:非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪、破壞公用電信設(shè)施罪、擾亂無(wú)線電通信管理秩序罪、詐騙罪、非法生產(chǎn)、銷售間諜專用器材罪;可能構(gòu)成的其他犯罪包括:虛假?gòu)V告罪、非法獲取公民個(gè)人信息罪、非法侵入、非法控制計(jì)算機(jī)信息系統(tǒng)罪、傳播淫穢物品牟利罪和傳播淫穢物品罪。偽基站案件中涉及共犯認(rèn)定與罪數(shù)形態(tài)問題,具體包括生產(chǎn)者、銷售者與使用者是否構(gòu)成共犯、廣告者與廣告經(jīng)營(yíng)者(即使用者)是否成立共犯;以及一罪與數(shù)罪、擇一重罪還是數(shù)罪并罰的辨析。對(duì)打擊此類犯罪我們應(yīng)進(jìn)一步完善法律,加強(qiáng)相關(guān)部門的聯(lián)合執(zhí)法。
[Abstract]:The pseudo-base station cases occur frequently in recent years, which show the following characteristics: high scientific and technological content of crime tools, simple operation, low cost, large mobility of crime, complex division of common crime, close ties between organizations, high rate of repeated crimes, and high rate of repeated crimes. Has formed a criminal industrial chain. At present, the deterrence of administrative sanctions is insufficient, the provisions of criminal law lag behind, and there are some applicable conflicts between the four ministries and the provisions of the Criminal Law. There are two views on the case of pseudo-base station: innocence and conviction. The theory of innocence is based on the modesty of criminal law, and the current administrative regulations are sufficient to regulate the case of pseudo-base station. The theory of incrimination believes that the case of pseudo-base station is more harmful to society and infringes the interests of telecom operators. Endangering public safety, property safety and so on, is also the need to prevent recidivism. The individual thinks that the pseudo-base station case has the necessity of the criminal law regulation, this case seriously infringes all kinds of legal interests of the criminal law protection, the establishment crime does not violate the criminal law modesty; Combined with the Criminal Law Amendment (9) draft, this paper analyzes the criminal law regulation of pseudo-base station cases. This paper analyzes the object of crime, the result of harm, the subject of conduct, the case of this kind of case endangering public security, threatening the security of public and private property and personal information, disturbing the order of market operation, etc. The main body of the crime includes natural person, and so on. Unit, but part of the charge against different subjects different standards of prosecution. The crime of pseudo-base station mainly consists of the following crimes: the crime of illegal operation, the crime of destroying public telecommunication facilities, the crime of disturbing the order of radio communication management, the crime of fraud, the crime of illegally producing and selling special equipment for espionage; Other possible crimes include: false advertising, illegal acquisition of citizens' personal information, illegal invasion, illegal control of computer information systems, dissemination of obscene materials for profit and dissemination of obscene materials. In the case of pseudo-base station, the identification of accomplice and the number of crimes are involved, including whether the producer, the seller and the user constitute an accomplice, whether the advertiser and the advertiser (that is, the user) constitute an accomplice; An analysis of whether to choose a felony or a combination of several crimes. To fight this kind of crime, we should further perfect the law, strengthen the joint law enforcement of relevant departments.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 劉海梅;;對(duì)危害公共安全罪中“公共安全”的界定[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年31期

2 杜翔;;“偽基站”案件法律適用及打防對(duì)策研究[J];廣西警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2014年03期

3 李曉郛;曹斌;;芻議一起“偽基站”案件的刑法規(guī)制[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年05期

4 陳謙信;;刑法的應(yīng)然與實(shí)然[J];世紀(jì)橋;2008年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條

1 本報(bào)記者 金可;[N];北京日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

2 本報(bào)記者 蔣皓;[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

3 金鑫 北京市人民檢察院第一分院;[N];人民法院報(bào);2014年

4 記者 陳穎婷;[N];上海法治報(bào);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2045648