本文選題：集資詐騙罪 + 非法集資��； 參考：《河南師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,隨著市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,金融市場(chǎng)的繁榮與企業(yè)融資困難的矛盾加劇,民間融資有了盛行空間,后滋生了諸如非法吸收公眾存款、集資詐騙等犯罪行為,尤其是集資詐騙犯罪活動(dòng)愈演愈烈,不僅嚴(yán)重危害我國(guó)的金融管理秩序,更對(duì)集資群眾財(cái)產(chǎn)造成巨大損失,極易引發(fā)群體事件,造成了諸多社會(huì)不穩(wěn)定因素。諸多個(gè)案引起了媒體和社會(huì)各界的廣泛關(guān)注,受當(dāng)前經(jīng)濟(jì)形勢(shì)等因素影響,今后一段時(shí)期內(nèi),集資詐騙犯罪的案件仍將持續(xù)高位運(yùn)行,并可能集中爆發(fā)。浙江吳英案等一系列社會(huì)影響較大的集資詐騙案爆發(fā)之后,社會(huì)各界加大了對(duì)于集資詐騙罪的關(guān)注和研究,尤其是關(guān)于集資詐騙罪的死刑是否廢除的爭(zhēng)議一直不休,直至《刑法修正案(九)》廢除該罪的死刑,才塵埃落定。論文將從集資詐騙罪的犯罪構(gòu)成各個(gè)方面入手,對(duì)諸多重點(diǎn)、難點(diǎn)問題如何認(rèn)定逐一分析,以求對(duì)實(shí)踐中準(zhǔn)確認(rèn)定本罪提供實(shí)質(zhì)性幫助。論文內(nèi)容主要分四個(gè)部分,分別研究了以下幾個(gè)問題:第一部分通過對(duì)集資詐騙罪的現(xiàn)狀及現(xiàn)實(shí)危害入手,描述目前社會(huì)上集資詐騙罪的實(shí)際現(xiàn)狀,以及對(duì)國(guó)家金融管理秩序、公私財(cái)產(chǎn)所有權(quán)、社會(huì)穩(wěn)定造成的危害,以凸顯對(duì)本罪研究的意義。第二部分從集資詐騙罪的犯罪構(gòu)成特征分析,具體分析司法實(shí)踐中如何根據(jù)犯罪構(gòu)成要件來認(rèn)定集資詐騙罪。分別研究了本罪所侵犯的的客體;客觀方面主要研究了對(duì)“詐騙方法”、“非法集資”、“不特定公眾”及犯罪數(shù)額如何認(rèn)定;主體方面著重對(duì)單位犯罪主體中的金融機(jī)構(gòu)、單位的分支或內(nèi)設(shè)機(jī)構(gòu)、一人有限公司等能否成為本罪犯罪主體進(jìn)行分析;主觀方面重點(diǎn)研究認(rèn)定“非法占有目的”過程中推定的運(yùn)用及行為表現(xiàn)分析。第三部分進(jìn)一步對(duì)集資詐騙罪的相關(guān)行為界限進(jìn)行分析,分別研究了集資詐騙罪與合法集資、民間借貸等非罪之間的界限,以及集資詐騙罪與非法吸收公眾存款罪、合同詐騙罪等彼罪之間的的界限,對(duì)正確認(rèn)定集資詐騙罪起到一定幫助作用。最后一部分對(duì)集資詐騙罪的罪數(shù)形態(tài)如何認(rèn)定進(jìn)行探析,分別研究了集資詐騙罪一罪的法條競(jìng)合、想象競(jìng)合犯、牽連犯、連續(xù)犯等形態(tài),尤其對(duì)司法實(shí)踐中存在的集資詐騙犯的牽連犯幾種特殊情形著重分析;并從非法占有目的成立時(shí)間及各個(gè)犯罪成立時(shí)間不同對(duì)集資詐騙罪的數(shù)罪認(rèn)定進(jìn)行分析。對(duì)集資詐騙罪的罪數(shù)進(jìn)行研究,對(duì)于司法機(jī)關(guān)在實(shí)踐中對(duì)被告人定罪進(jìn)而量刑關(guān)系重大,以爭(zhēng)取能夠做到不枉不縱。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the development of the market economy, the contradiction between the prosperity of the financial market and the financing difficulties of enterprises has intensified, and there is room for private financing to prevail, and criminal acts such as illegal absorption of public deposits, fund-raising fraud, etc. Especially, the crime of financing fraud is becoming more and more serious, which not only seriously endangers the order of financial management in our country, but also causes huge losses to the property of the people who raise funds, which easily leads to group events and causes many social instability factors. Many cases have aroused the widespread concern of the media and all walks of life, affected by the current economic situation and other factors, in the future, the case of fund-raising fraud will continue to run high, and may erupt in concentration. After the outbreak of a series of large-scale fund-raising fraud cases such as the Wuying case in Zhejiang Province, various sectors of society have increased their attention and research on the crime of fund-raising fraud, especially the controversy over whether the death penalty should be abolished for the crime of fund-raising fraud. It was not until the Criminal Law Amendment (9) abolished the death penalty for this crime that the dust was settled. This paper will start from the various aspects of the crime of financing fraud, and analyze many key points and difficult problems one by one, in order to provide substantive help for the accurate identification of this crime in practice. The content of this paper is divided into four parts. The following problems are studied: the first part describes the actual situation of the crime of fund-raising fraud and the order of national financial management through the analysis of the current situation and the actual harm of the crime of fraud through raising funds. Public-private property ownership, social stability, in order to highlight the significance of the study of this crime. The second part analyzes the characteristics of the crime constitution of the crime of fund-raising fraud, and analyzes how to identify the crime of financing fraud according to the elements of crime in the judicial practice. The object of the crime is studied separately; the objective aspect mainly studies the methods of fraud, the illegal raising of funds, the determination of the amount of crime and the determination of the amount of the crime; the main body focuses on the financial institutions in the subject of unit crime, Whether the branch or the internal organization of the unit or the limited company of one person can be the subject of this crime is analyzed. The subjective aspect focuses on the application of presumption and the analysis of behavior performance in the process of determining "the purpose of illegal possession". The third part further analyzes the relevant behavior boundaries of the crime of fraud of raising funds, and studies the boundary between the crime of fraud of raising funds and the non-crime of raising funds legally, private borrowing and so on, as well as the crime of fraud of raising funds and the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits. The boundary between the crime of contract fraud and so on, plays a certain role in correctly identifying the crime of financing fraud. In the last part of the paper, the author analyzes how to determine the crime number of the crime of fraud of raising funds, and studies the forms of the crime of fraud of raising funds, such as the concurrence of the law, the imagination of the joint crime, the implicated crime, the continuous crime, and so on. Especially in the judicial practice of the existence of several special cases of alleged fraud of funds, and from the illegal possession of the purpose of the establishment of time and different time of the establishment of the crime of financing fraud to determine the crime of a number of crimes. The study on the number of the crime of raising funds for fraud is of great importance to the judicial organs in the practice of conviction and sentencing of the defendant, in order to be able to achieve the right.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鐘合;;是“集資詐騙”還是正當(dāng)民間融資? 湖南湘西曾成杰非法集資案的回顧與思考[J];上海企業(yè);2013年08期

2 姚萬勤;;解釋學(xué)視域下的集資詐騙罪重構(gòu)——以主觀目的、行為對(duì)象的實(shí)質(zhì)分析為進(jìn)路[J];成都理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年06期

3 劉彬;;集資詐騙罪犯罪數(shù)額研究[J];湖南警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年05期

4 陳鵬鵬;王周;;集資詐騙罪的認(rèn)定問題[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

5 張建;俞小海;;集資詐騙罪對(duì)象研究中的認(rèn)識(shí)誤區(qū)及其辨正[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2011年06期

6 劉為波;;非法集資特征的理解與認(rèn)定[J];中國(guó)審判;2011年02期

7 崔楠;;集資詐騙罪“數(shù)額”的罪量刑量分析[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2010年12期

8 周光權(quán);;法條競(jìng)合的特別關(guān)系研究——兼與張明楷教授商榷[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2010年03期

9 王雄飛;;論事實(shí)推定和法律推定[J];河北法學(xué);2008年06期

10 趙琳琳;;論刑事訴訟中的推定規(guī)則及其在我國(guó)的確立[J];湖南公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 劉培瑩;;淺析集資詐騙罪認(rèn)定中的幾個(gè)難點(diǎn)[N];西部法制報(bào);2015年

2 周宏偉;;“口口相傳”也是非法集資重要宣傳途徑[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1978270