本文選題：背信行為 + 他人處理事務(wù)�。� 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)水平的提高,社會(huì)分工的不斷發(fā)展以及經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)所有權(quán)分離的現(xiàn)代企業(yè)組織的建立,信任義務(wù)成為市場(chǎng)繁榮必須之零部件。在現(xiàn)今經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)中,侵犯財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)和破壞市場(chǎng)良好運(yùn)行機(jī)制的背信行為呈愈演愈烈之勢(shì)。背信罪就是指行為人在為他人處理事務(wù)過(guò)程中違反與委托人之間的信任關(guān)系,使得委托人財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益受損由刑法進(jìn)行規(guī)制的犯罪。背信罪在德日等國(guó)刑法中是個(gè)常見的罪名,但我國(guó)并未在刑法內(nèi)規(guī)定背信罪,對(duì)背信犯罪行為因?yàn)樾谭ㄎ从幸?guī)定背信之罪而無(wú)從對(duì)其進(jìn)行刑罰懲罰。我國(guó)刑法理論界對(duì)背信罪的相關(guān)理論研究較少且都偏重于對(duì)德日之背信罪進(jìn)行介紹與對(duì)比,直接對(duì)該罪本身之結(jié)構(gòu)與本質(zhì)進(jìn)行的研究并不多。德國(guó)和日本對(duì)背信罪在立法和司法方面的實(shí)踐與理論經(jīng)驗(yàn)豐富且對(duì)該罪之理論研究也頗有心得,故對(duì)德日背信罪之立法情況、犯罪構(gòu)成要件及對(duì)背信本質(zhì)相關(guān)學(xué)說(shuō)的分析研究,對(duì)于正確界定何為背信之本質(zhì),何為背信行為,準(zhǔn)確認(rèn)定我國(guó)刑法內(nèi)帶有背信特征之犯罪,了解我國(guó)背信犯罪之立法缺陷以及科學(xué)建構(gòu)并完善我國(guó)之背信犯罪立法體系具有重要之作用。文章之研究目的,是通過(guò)對(duì)背信罪的概念介紹與該罪本質(zhì)之各學(xué)說(shuō)分析,并在對(duì)德日刑法背信罪構(gòu)成要件之分析的基礎(chǔ)之上,歸納出背信之行為模式,對(duì)我國(guó)刑法中之背信犯罪立法不足之處進(jìn)行分析總結(jié),進(jìn)而對(duì)背信罪之立法改進(jìn)提出相應(yīng)之建議,以期在我國(guó)刑法規(guī)范內(nèi)對(duì)背信犯罪行為進(jìn)行有效之規(guī)制。全文共分四章:第一章是從宏觀性的角度對(duì)背信罪進(jìn)行說(shuō)明。本章首先對(duì)背信罪的基本概念以及本質(zhì)進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的介紹,并在此基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)德日之背信罪的立法沿革以及構(gòu)成要件作出完整的闡述,從而為下文對(duì)背信行為之分析以及我國(guó)刑法內(nèi)之背信犯罪認(rèn)定打下基礎(chǔ)。第二章是全文重點(diǎn),對(duì)背信行為作出詳細(xì)分析。首先對(duì)關(guān)于背信行為概念上的理解之差異作出厘清,并分析各中概念之存在差異性,并在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)背信行為之概念進(jìn)行清晰界定;其此對(duì)背信行為之特征進(jìn)行了分析歸納,對(duì)“為他人處理事務(wù)”及“誠(chéng)實(shí)信任關(guān)系”這些背信罪中的重要概念都作出了界定。第三章是對(duì)我國(guó)背信犯罪之立法進(jìn)行了闡述,結(jié)合對(duì)背信行為的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn),總結(jié)我國(guó)刑法存在一定量的特殊背信罪,系統(tǒng)闡明了我國(guó)特殊背信罪之特點(diǎn),進(jìn)而對(duì)我國(guó)背信犯罪立法存在之罪名無(wú)體系性、立法被動(dòng)滯后以及過(guò)于保護(hù)國(guó)有財(cái)產(chǎn)的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了分析。第四章是論述對(duì)我國(guó)背信罪之完善并構(gòu)建動(dòng)態(tài)平衡的背信罪之立法體系,內(nèi)容主要為圍繞增設(shè)普通背信罪之相關(guān)問(wèn)題及普通背信罪之條文設(shè)置。對(duì)于普通背信罪之增設(shè),應(yīng)在分析出其立法之必要性的基礎(chǔ)上就相關(guān)問(wèn)題在具體條款設(shè)定時(shí)要注意把握法條之抽象概括性與用語(yǔ)精確明晰之平進(jìn)行說(shuō)明,并在立法中對(duì)構(gòu)成要件進(jìn)行設(shè)計(jì)并協(xié)調(diào)好與現(xiàn)有之特殊背信罪的之關(guān)系;另一方面,普通背信罪之刑罰設(shè)計(jì)應(yīng)在綜合考慮特殊背信罪及一些列情況下保持相對(duì)之科學(xué)合理的刑罰設(shè)置。
[Abstract]:With the improvement of our economic level, the continuous development of the social division of labor and the establishment of modern enterprise organization, the obligation of trust has become the necessary part of the market prosperity. In the current economic activities, the breach of the property rights and the damage to the good operating mechanism of the market is becoming more and more intense. The perpetrator violates the trust relationship with the client in the process of dealing with other people, which makes the property interests of the principal damaged by the criminal law. The crime of breach of trust is a common crime in the criminal law of Germany and Japan, but our country does not stipulate the crime of breach of trust in the criminal law, and the breach of the criminal law has not been stipulated in the criminal law. In our criminal law theory, the theoretical circles of our criminal law have little research on the related theory of the crime of betrayal and both emphasize on the crime of breach of trust in Germany and Japan. The study on the structure and nature of the crime itself is not much. The practice and theoretical experience of the crime of breach of trust in the legislation and judicature in Germany and Japan The theoretical study of the crime is also very good. Therefore, the legislative situation of the crime of trust in Germany and Japan, the constitutive requirements of the crime and the analysis of the theory of the essence of the breach of trust, to correctly define what is the essence of the breach of trust, what is the breach of trust, the accurate identification of the crime of the back letter in our criminal law and the legislation of our country's breach of trust crime The purpose of this article is to analyze the concept of the crime of breach of trust and the essence of the crime, and to sum up the behavior pattern of the breach of trust on the basis of the analysis of the constitutive requirements of the crime of breach of trust in Germany and Japan, and to the criminal law of our country. This paper makes an analysis and summary of the shortcomings of the legislation of the crime of betrayal, and then puts forward some corresponding suggestions on the legislative improvement of the crime of breach of trust in order to regulate the criminal offences in the criminal law of our country effectively. The full text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter is the explanation of the crime of breach of trust from the perspective of macroscopical nature. The essence has been introduced in detail, and on this basis, the legislative evolution and the constitutive requirements of the crime of breach of trust in Germany and Japan are fully expounded, so as to lay the foundation for the analysis of the act of betrayal and the confirmation of the breach of trust in our criminal law. The second chapter is the focus of the full text, and makes a detailed analysis of the act of breach of trust. The difference in the understanding of the concept of faith is clarified, and the differences in the existence of the concepts are analyzed. On the basis of this, the concept of the breach of trust is clearly defined, and the characteristics of the breach of trust are analyzed and summarized, and the important concepts in the crime of "dealing with other people" and "honest trust relationship" are made. The third chapter is to define the legislation of the criminal offense in our country, and to sum up the standard of the cognizance of the breach of trust, sum up a certain amount of special breach of trust in the criminal law of our country, and systematically clarify the characteristics of the special offense in our country, and then to the non system of the crimes in the legislation of our country's breach of trust, the lagging behind the legislation and the overdue delay in the legislation. The fourth chapter is to discuss the perfection of the crime of breach of trust in our country and to build a dynamic balance of the legislative system of the crime of breach of trust. The main content is to set up the related issues of the crime of general breach of trust and the provision of the general breach of trust crime. On the basis of the specific provisions of the relevant issues, we should pay attention to grasp the abstract generality of the law and the precise and clear balance of the law, and design and coordinate the relationship between the constitutive requirements and the existing special breach of trust in the legislation; on the other hand, the penalty design of the general breach of faith should take into account the crime of special breach of trust. And relatively scientific and reasonable punishment settings under certain circumstances.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 肖艷;上市公司“掏空”現(xiàn)象透視:以ST猴王為例[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：1977783