本文選題：激憤殺人 + 立法模式�。� 參考：《東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年S1期

【摘要】：無論是基于社會(huì)的現(xiàn)實(shí)需要還是立足于刑法理論,增設(shè)"激憤殺人"的刑事立法已成為必然。本文在論證了立法必要性的前提下,就"激憤殺人"的立法模式、認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及量刑配置等問題進(jìn)行了剖析,并提出了具體的立法建議——通過修正案的方式在我國刑法第232條故意殺人罪條文中增加一款:"激憤殺人的,不適用死刑";并通過立法或者司法解釋將"激憤殺人"認(rèn)定為:由于被害人的嚴(yán)重過錯(cuò)而受到了強(qiáng)烈的精神刺激,行為人在絕望、暴怒等難以控制的激憤情緒狀態(tài)下當(dāng)場殺死被害人的行為。
[Abstract]:Whether it is based on the social needs or based on the criminal law theory, it has become inevitable to add the criminal legislation of "killing people with indignation". On the premise of demonstrating the necessity of legislation, this paper analyzes the legislative model, the standard of confirmation and the disposition of sentencing of "indignant murder". And put forward a specific legislative proposal-through the way of amendment to our country's criminal law in the 232 article of intentional homicide provisions added a paragraph: "indignant homicide," "do not apply the death penalty"; and, through legislation or judicial interpretation, regards "indignant murder" as a result of the victim's serious fault, which is strongly stimulated by the spirit, and the perpetrator is desperate, The act of killing a victim on the spot in a state of uncontrollable indignation.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學(xué)法律學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 曲新久;論我國刑法中的簡單罪狀及其完善[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1991年06期

2 陳明;趙寧;;簡單罪狀的司法認(rèn)定和解釋規(guī)則研究——以盜竊罪的司法認(rèn)定為例[J];政治與法律;2013年04期

3 劉沛，

本文編號(hào)：1952575