本文選題：研究 + 完善�。� 參考：《中國海洋大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：騙取出境證件罪是97年刑法修訂時增加的罪名,該罪名的設(shè)立為打擊近年來日益突出的涉證型偷渡犯罪起到了非常重要的作用。然而由于受當(dāng)時立法條件的局限,該刑法條文的規(guī)定存在著不盡完善的方面,特別是隨著形勢的發(fā)展,司法實踐中對該罪的犯罪構(gòu)成、罪與非罪、此罪與彼罪的界限等方面都產(chǎn)生了較大的爭議,實踐中對個案的處理也不盡一致。因此筆者試圖結(jié)合司法實踐中的典型案例對上述爭議問題做深入探討,以期在理論上有所突破與創(chuàng)新,為指導(dǎo)騙取出境證件罪的司法實踐、完善騙取出境證件罪的立法貢獻微薄之力。本文共分四章對騙取出境證件罪進行系統(tǒng)研究。第一章騙取出境證件罪概述,筆者就我國和國際出入境證件制度和騙取出境證件罪的概念和立法沿革等問題作概要論述。首先介紹了我國和國際出入境證件制度,指出護照和簽證是出入境的主要證件,并與此相適應(yīng)形成了護照制度和簽證制度兩大法律制度。其次論述了騙取出境證件罪從無到有的立法演變過程。第二章騙取出境證件罪的犯罪構(gòu)成,論述了騙取出境證件罪的犯罪客觀方面、犯罪客體、犯罪主體、犯罪主觀方面四個要件。首先對各構(gòu)成要件的內(nèi)容進行了闡述,其次對如何正確理解刑法第319條中的“其他名義”、“弄虛作假”的犯罪手段、“暗渡陳倉”式組織偷渡中的騙取出境證件行為及“為組織他人偷越國(邊)境使用”的要件屬性等問題進行了研究。第三章系統(tǒng)論述了騙取出境證件罪的罪與非罪,騙取出境證件罪與組織他人偷越國(邊)境罪、詐騙罪、出售出境證件罪的區(qū)別以及犯罪既遂與犯罪未遂的認定等問題。第四章騙取出境證件罪的立法完善。指出我國刑法第319條尚不夠完善,存在缺陷主要在罪狀表述方面,即犯罪對象、犯罪方式、犯罪目的方面,建議將犯罪對象由“出境證件”改為“出入境證件”,犯罪方式的規(guī)定取消,將“為組織他人偷越國(邊)境”的犯罪目的改為“為他人出入境使用”。
[Abstract]:The crime of defrauding the exit certificate was added when the Criminal Law was revised in 1997. The establishment of the crime has played a very important role in cracking down on the increasingly prominent crime of illegal immigration involving evidence in recent years. However, due to the limitation of the legislative conditions at that time, the provisions of the article of the criminal law are not perfect, especially with the development of the situation, the constitution of the crime, the crime and the non-crime in the judicial practice. The boundary between this crime and that crime has produced great controversy, and the handling of the case is not consistent in practice. Therefore, the author tries to make a thorough discussion on the above controversial issues in combination with typical cases in judicial practice, in order to make a breakthrough and innovation in theory, in order to guide the judicial practice of the crime of deceiving exit documents. Perfecting the legislation of the crime of defrauding exit documents contributes meagre. This paper is divided into four chapters to systematically study the crime of defrauding exit documents. The first chapter is an overview of the crime of defrauding exit documents. The author makes a brief discussion on the system of entry and exit documents and the concept and legislative evolution of the crime of defrauding exit documents in our country and in the world. This paper first introduces the system of entry and exit documents of our country and international countries, points out that passport and visa are the main documents of entry and exit, and forms two legal systems of passport system and visa system. Secondly, it discusses the legislative evolution of the crime of defrauding exit documents from scratch. The second chapter discusses the criminal constitution of the crime of defrauding exit documents, discusses the objective aspects of crime, the object of crime and the subjective aspect of crime. First of all, it expounds the contents of each constituent element, and secondly, it discusses how to correctly understand the criminal means of "other names" and "fraud" in Article 319 of the Criminal Law. This paper studies the behavior of obtaining exit certificate by cheating in the illegal immigration of "secret crossing Chen Cang" organization and the essential elements attribute of "organizing other people to use the border of the country (border)" and so on. The third chapter systematically discusses the crime and non-crime of defrauding exit document, the crime of deceptive exit document and the crime of organizing others to cross the border of the country (border), the crime of fraud, the distinction between the crime of selling exit document and the identification of accomplished crime and attempted crime, etc. Chapter IV the legislative perfection of the crime of defrauding exit documents. It is pointed out that Article 319 of the Criminal Law of our country is not perfect, and its defects are mainly in the aspects of the description of the crime, that is, the object of the crime, the way of the crime, and the purpose of the crime. It is suggested that the object of the crime be changed from "exit document" to "exit document". The crime mode is abolished and the criminal purpose of "organizing others to cross the border" is changed to "use for the entry and exit of others".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國海洋大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孟慶華;騙取出境證件罪的幾個司法認定問題探討[J];江西公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2004年01期

2 陳毅堅;;短縮二行為犯的競合:以騙取出境證件罪為例[J];西部法學(xué)評論;2010年05期

3 馬勇;;如何認定錢明的罪行[J];出國與就業(yè);2000年12期

4 ;最高人民法院關(guān)于審理組織、運送他人偷越國(邊)境等刑事案件適用法律若干問題的解釋[J];中華人民共和國最高人民法院公報;2002年02期

5 曹曉燁;蔡永彤;;妨害國(邊)境管理罪疑難問題研究[J];河南公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2009年04期

6 曲肖彬;;一個偷渡團伙的覆滅[J];檢察風(fēng)云;2006年17期

7 盧勁杉;;檢眼破擊“包裝”偷渡[J];檢察風(fēng)云;2011年03期

8 潘京;;組團出國乞討的老人[J];晚報文萃;2013年12期

9 湯海軍;;中國偷渡犯罪刑事立法之反思[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2010年04期

10 ;合法腐敗——透視監(jiān)外執(zhí)行中的司法黑洞[J];東西南北;2004年06期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 張秋波;;論妨害國(邊)境管理犯罪中的幾個問題[A];21世紀(jì)出入境（移民）管理研討會論文集[C];2008年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前9條

1 趙新宇;以旅游等名義滯留國外應(yīng)否定罪[N];檢察日報;2007年

2 北京市檢察院 龐靜;為多人編造材料騙取簽證如何定性[N];檢察日報;2008年

3 通訊員 劉維翔;網(wǎng)上發(fā)消息幫人辦護照[N];檢察日報;2011年

4 陳平建 熊理思;瞞騙同伙干“私活” 是否“共犯”惹爭議[N];法治快報;2007年

5 本報記者 張慧鵬 本報通訊員 曹志明;摧毀出境“旅游”陷阱[N];人民法院報;2003年

6 張松濤;偽造文件騙簽證助人出國牟暴利[N];法治快報;2007年

7 徐德高 李平;辦理偷渡案件：問題與對策[N];檢察日報;2004年

8 ;最高人民法院公告[N];檢察日報;2002年

9 關(guān)琳琳 李同安;藁城市法院依法審判一起組織42人偷越國（邊）境案[N];河北經(jīng)濟日報;2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 孫立強;騙取出境證件罪研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2014年

2 劉德軍;我國妨害國（邊）境管理罪立法之缺憾與完善[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1925011