本文選題：非法采砂 + 行政處罰�。� 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：非法采砂行為是指,在尚未獲得有關(guān)主管機(jī)關(guān)批準(zhǔn),獲得采砂許可證的情況下,或者雖然取得采砂許可證但是超范圍或在禁采區(qū)、禁采期,擅自獲取砂子資源的行為。伴隨著中國特色社會(huì)主義市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的迅速發(fā)展,建筑行業(yè)的迅速崛起,為建設(shè)用砂創(chuàng)造了廣泛的市場需求,砂石這一重要的建設(shè)物資已成為緊缺資源,導(dǎo)致市場價(jià)格也持續(xù)走高。與此同時(shí),砂石被大量出口到港澳臺(tái)和日、韓等國,在這種情況下更加劇了供需之間的矛盾。一些單位和個(gè)人面對巨大的利益誘惑開始從事非法采砂行為,砂子資源的濫采濫挖現(xiàn)象日益嚴(yán)重,不法采砂活動(dòng)十分猖狂。砂石資源是一種重要的非金屬礦產(chǎn)資源,但是在司法實(shí)踐中對其并沒有像其他礦產(chǎn)資源一樣得到很好的保護(hù)。近年來,在各地經(jīng)常發(fā)生非法獲取砂子資源的行為,非法采砂現(xiàn)象十分嚴(yán)重,由此帶來的危害后果尤為嚴(yán)重。不僅對堤防安全、航道安全產(chǎn)生嚴(yán)重影響,還會(huì)嚴(yán)重危害生態(tài)環(huán)境產(chǎn)生一系列社會(huì)問題。但在司法實(shí)踐中,對砂子等非金屬礦產(chǎn)的破壞,卻常常被大多數(shù)人所忽略,尤其是未能得到執(zhí)法人員的足夠重視。對于非法采砂這一違法行為的處理,最常見的是處理方式是行政處罰。行政處罰中最常見的處理方式是罰款,而罰款數(shù)額的額度和非法采砂行為帶來的暴利相差甚遠(yuǎn)。行政制裁手段的方式和力度較為輕緩,無法對被制裁者以及社會(huì)公眾形成有效的心理威懾。同時(shí),針對嚴(yán)重的非法采砂行為,刑罰手段規(guī)定不明確、不具有操作性,行政處罰和刑事處罰存在銜接障礙。鑒于此,以類型化的方法為指導(dǎo),完善對于非法采砂案件行政處罰和刑事處罰的銜接模式,并在此基礎(chǔ)上建議設(shè)立非法采砂罪,實(shí)屬必要。本文主要從三個(gè)方面對非法采砂行為進(jìn)行刑法規(guī)制展開詳細(xì)論述:第一部分:非法采砂行為的規(guī)制困境。包括對非法采砂行為進(jìn)行界定、行政處罰與刑事處罰存在的銜接障礙、以刑事責(zé)任追究非法采砂行為罪名選擇存在的分歧。這一部分是展開理論論述的前提。第二部分:非法采砂行為行政處罰和刑事處罰銜接障礙的解決。這一部分主要針對行政處罰和刑事處罰的銜接模式選擇進(jìn)行論述,確定銜接模式并完善銜接機(jī)制,減少司法實(shí)踐中“以罰代刑”問題的發(fā)生。第三部分:非法采砂行為的刑事立法建議。在這部分通過論證設(shè)立非法采砂罪的必要性和可行性,建議在刑法分則體系中設(shè)立非法采砂罪,以期運(yùn)用刑罰手段解決非法采砂亂象。
[Abstract]:Illegal sand mining behavior refers to the behavior of obtaining sand resources without the approval of relevant authorities and obtaining sand mining permits, or obtaining sand mining permits in excess of the scope or in the prohibited mining area or in the period of mining ban. With the rapid development of the socialist market economy with Chinese characteristics and the rapid rise of the construction industry, the construction sand has created extensive market demand. Sand and stone, an important construction material, has become a scarce resource. As a result, market prices continue to rise. At the same time, the sand is exported to Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and other countries, which exacerbates the contradiction between supply and demand. Some units and individuals began to engage in illegal sand mining in the face of huge profit temptation. The phenomenon of excessive mining and excessive excavation of sand resources is becoming more and more serious and illegal sand mining activities are rampant. Sand and stone resource is an important non-metallic mineral resource, but it has not been well protected as other mineral resources in judicial practice. In recent years, illegal acquisition of sand resources often occurs in various places, the phenomenon of illegal sand mining is very serious, and the harmful consequences are especially serious. Not only the safety of levees and waterways will be seriously affected, but also a series of social problems will be seriously harmful to the ecological environment. However, in the judicial practice, the destruction of non-metallic minerals such as sand is often ignored by most people, especially the law enforcement personnel do not pay enough attention to it. The most common way to deal with illegal sand mining is administrative punishment. The most common way to deal with administrative punishment is fine, and the amount of penalty is far from the huge profits caused by illegal sand mining. The way and intensity of administrative sanctions are relatively gentle, which can not form an effective psychological deterrent to the sanctioned persons and the public. At the same time, according to the serious illegal sand mining behavior, the penalty method is not clear and operational, and the administrative punishment and the criminal punishment have the connection obstacle. In view of this, it is necessary to perfect the linking mode of administrative punishment and criminal punishment for illegal sand mining cases under the guidance of the typological method, and on the basis of which, it is necessary to propose the establishment of illegal sand mining crime. This paper mainly discusses the regulation of illegal sand mining from three aspects: the first part: the regulation of illegal sand mining dilemmas. Including the definition of illegal sand mining behavior, administrative punishment and criminal punishment of the link obstacles, criminal responsibility for illegal sand mining behavior of the choice of differences. This part is the premise of the theoretical discussion. The second part: the solution of administrative punishment and criminal punishment of illegal sand mining. This part mainly discusses the choice of the linking mode of administrative punishment and criminal punishment, determines the cohesive mode and consummates the connection mechanism, and reduces the occurrence of the problem of "substitute punishment with punishment" in judicial practice. The third part: the criminal legislation suggestion of illegal sand mining. In this part, the necessity and feasibility of establishing the crime of illegal sand mining are demonstrated, and it is suggested that the crime of illegal sand mining should be established in the system of criminal law, in order to solve the disorder of illegal sand mining by means of punishment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 肖中華;;刑法目的解釋和體系解釋的具體運(yùn)用[J];法學(xué)評論;2006年05期

2 趙慶;劉揚(yáng);黃海英;;非法采砂面臨的司法困境及對策研究[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年12期

3 王金生;;淺論以非法采礦罪追究長江河道非法采砂刑事責(zé)任[J];水利發(fā)展研究;2013年09期

4 康紀(jì)田;;非法采砂的犯罪形態(tài)及其適用[J];水利發(fā)展研究;2013年11期

5 劉麗華;;對江西省首例非法河道采砂入刑工作的思考[J];水利發(fā)展研究;2013年08期

6 李曉妹;;國內(nèi)外河道采砂管理體制對比研究[J];中國礦業(yè);2010年09期

7 劉燦華;;罪數(shù)理論體系化:反思與重構(gòu)[J];中國刑事法雜志;2011年08期

8 鄭冬渝;;關(guān)于我國行為法學(xué)的研究[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(法治論叢);2012年06期

9 勞東燕;;刑法中目的解釋的方法論反思[J];政法論壇;2014年03期

，

本文編號：1901927