本文選題：搶劫罪 + 強(qiáng)迫交易罪��； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：以暴力、威脅手段強(qiáng)迫他人提供貸款行為是指行為人以圍困、毆打、捆綁等作用力對(duì)相關(guān)人或物實(shí)施有形傷害或精神強(qiáng)制為手段，強(qiáng)迫金融機(jī)構(gòu)人員提供法律形式的貸款行為。該行為的特征主要表現(xiàn)在三個(gè)方面：行為人主觀上具有故意，，行為客觀上實(shí)施了暴力威脅等強(qiáng)迫行為，行為客體上侵犯了法律調(diào)整的法益。 目前，關(guān)于以暴力、威脅手段強(qiáng)迫他人提供貸款行為的定性存在諸多爭議，主要存在四種不同的學(xué)說，分別是搶劫罪說、敲詐勒索罪說、強(qiáng)迫交易罪說、無罪說，這四種觀點(diǎn)都各據(jù)一方，其中理論涉及客觀行為、主觀目的、刑法出罪等。由于貸款作為金融服務(wù)中的一種市場交易行為，其天然的與強(qiáng)迫交易相關(guān)聯(lián)，所以就必須對(duì)該行為所涉及的刑法理論問題進(jìn)行剖析，這其中就包括需要厘清搶劫罪和強(qiáng)迫交易罪、敲詐勒索罪和強(qiáng)迫交易罪之間的區(qū)別和界限。 對(duì)于以暴力、威脅手段強(qiáng)迫他人提供貸款行為的處理而言，法官應(yīng)當(dāng)從行為客觀方面與主觀方面綜合考慮，不能因模棱兩可的觀念而妄下結(jié)論。詳言之，首先貸款行為已經(jīng)成為金融機(jī)構(gòu)步入市場經(jīng)濟(jì)中一種很正常的市場交易行為，既然是市場交易行為，那么違反自愿公平原則進(jìn)行交易的行為就應(yīng)當(dāng)納入強(qiáng)迫交易罪予以規(guī)制；其次就行為主觀方面而言，“非法占有的目的”不是一個(gè)肆意妄為的概念，它是處分意思與利用意思相結(jié)合的產(chǎn)物，如果以非法占有為目的，以借貸為名采用暴力、脅迫手段強(qiáng)迫他人提供貸款，符合刑法第二百六十三條或者第二百七十四條規(guī)定的，就應(yīng)以搶劫罪或者敲詐勒索罪追究刑事責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:The act of forcing others to provide loans by means of violence or threat means that the perpetrator forces such as besieging, beating, binding and other forces to impose tangible injury or mental compulsion on the relevant persons or objects to force the financial institution personnel to provide loans in the form of law. The characteristics of this act are mainly in three aspects: the actor has intention subjectively, the act objectively implements the forced act such as threat of violence, and the object of the act violates the legal interests of the legal adjustment. At present, there are many controversies over the characterization of forcing others to provide loans by means of violence and threats. There are mainly four different doctrines, namely, robbery, extortion, forced transaction, innocence. The four views are based on one side, in which the theory involves objective behavior, subjective purpose, criminal offense and so on. As a kind of market transaction behavior in financial services, loan is naturally associated with forced transaction, so it is necessary to analyze the theoretical problems of criminal law involved in this behavior. This includes the need to clarify the distinction and boundaries between robbery and forced trading, extortion and forced trading. To deal with the act of forcing others to provide loans by means of violence and threat, the judge should consider comprehensively the objective and subjective aspects of the act, and should not jump to conclusions because of the concept of ambiguity. First of all, lending behavior has become a very normal market transaction behavior in the market economy of financial institutions. Since it is a market transaction behavior, Then the conduct of trade in violation of the principle of voluntary equity should be regulated by the crime of forced transaction. Secondly, in terms of subjective aspects of the act, "the purpose of illegal possession" is not a wanton concept. It is the product of combining the intention of punishment with the use of intention. If the purpose of illegal possession is to use violence in the name of borrowing and coercion to force others to provide loans, it conforms to the provisions of Article 263 or Article 274 of the Criminal Law. Criminal responsibility should be investigated for robbery or extortion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 田宏杰;海峽兩岸敲詐勒索罪比較研究[J];福建公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào).社會(huì)公共安全研究;1999年06期

2 伍紅,向國慧;強(qiáng)迫交易罪若干問題研究——對(duì)兩起強(qiáng)迫交易案件的分析[J];法律適用;2003年Z1期

3 劉艷紅;刑法第20條第3款“行兇”一詞的理論考察[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年06期

4 陳立;;鄭小平、鄒小虎搶劫案評(píng)析——以暴力、威脅手段強(qiáng)迫他人提供貸款的行為如何定性[J];廈門大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2002年01期

5 胡波;;論強(qiáng)迫交易罪實(shí)行行為中的暴力與威脅[J];河南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

6 吳占英;論強(qiáng)迫交易罪[J];荊門職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

7 張亞;劉穎;;強(qiáng)迫交易罪司法認(rèn)定中的幾個(gè)主要問題探討[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年08期

8 郭光華;強(qiáng)買強(qiáng)賣──將被科以“強(qiáng)迫交易罪”[J];人民公安;1997年17期

9 萬選才;搶劫罪與強(qiáng)迫交易罪辨析[J];人民司法;2001年10期

10 王萍萍;鄭璇哲;;淺析強(qiáng)迫交易罪的司法認(rèn)定[J];商業(yè)文化(下半月);2011年07期

本文編號(hào)：1875439