發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-11 19:33

  本文選題：嫖宿幼女罪 + 自愿　； 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：嫖宿幼女罪自設(shè)立為獨(dú)立罪名開始就一直爭議不斷,對是否應(yīng)該廢止該罪學(xué)者們提出了不同的觀點(diǎn)。隨著社會的不斷進(jìn)步,嫖宿幼女罪的立法缺陷在司法實(shí)踐中逐漸顯現(xiàn)出來,很多涉及嫖宿幼女罪的案件判決都不能得到大家認(rèn)可,認(rèn)為判決不公正,引起了社會公眾的不滿,導(dǎo)致嫖宿幼女罪存廢之爭更加激烈。本文就是從嫖宿幼女罪的立法規(guī)定入手,對比各個(gè)觀點(diǎn)適用的優(yōu)劣,進(jìn)一步論述嫖宿幼女罪存在的立法問題,分析嫖宿幼女罪廢止的可行性,和廢止之后相關(guān)行為的規(guī)制。本文主要從三部分逐步深入的探討嫖宿幼女罪的廢止問題:首先,介紹了嫖宿幼女罪目前的立法、司法現(xiàn)狀和該罪存廢的不同學(xué)說之爭。對于任何罪名的判斷都以對一個(gè)罪名的深入了解為前提,因此我們必須深入的評析該罪設(shè)立的立法歷史,目前的立法現(xiàn)狀,及理解該罪的內(nèi)涵概念。一個(gè)罪名要想進(jìn)一步體現(xiàn)其規(guī)制犯罪的價(jià)值,充分發(fā)揮其功能,一定要從立法規(guī)定上適用到司法實(shí)踐中,但是嫖宿幼女罪在司法實(shí)踐過程中卻存在很多的難題,適用的并不理想。結(jié)合嫖宿幼女罪的立法規(guī)定和司法適用中的問題,許多學(xué)者對該罪是否應(yīng)該繼續(xù)存在提出了質(zhì)疑,引起了該罪存廢之爭,提出了存在論、廢除論和解釋論。其次,以廢止論的角度出發(fā),論述了嫖宿幼女罪廢止的必要性。一個(gè)罪名之所以被許多學(xué)者建議廢止,是因?yàn)榇嬖诤芏嗔⒎ㄉ系娜毕荨１疚闹饕菑奈鍌�(gè)方面上論述了該罪立法規(guī)定存在的問題。一、雖然嫖宿幼女罪設(shè)立的立法初衷是保護(hù)幼女的的身心健康,但該罪的設(shè)立不但沒有體現(xiàn)出這個(gè)初衷,反而與之相背離。二、嫖宿幼女罪作為刑法的一個(gè)罪名,卻沒有遵循刑法的基本原則。三、從自身犯罪構(gòu)成要素上說明該罪設(shè)立本身就存在矛盾和不合理。四、比較嫖宿幼女罪與強(qiáng)奸罪的犯罪構(gòu)成,及解釋論處理原則的不奏效,體現(xiàn)嫖宿幼女罪存在的非必要性。五、該罪存在也不符合《兒童權(quán)利公約》的基本原則。最后,以第二部分嫖宿幼女罪存在諸多問題為前提,論述嫖宿幼女罪廢止之后相關(guān)犯罪行為規(guī)制的路徑。總結(jié)外國立法對性侵幼女犯罪的規(guī)定中,為我國規(guī)制侵犯幼女犯罪行為提供借鑒。一旦嫖宿幼女罪被廢止,相關(guān)犯罪行為的危害性依然存在,依然需要刑法條文的規(guī)制,因此給出了修改相關(guān)條文的意見:原來屬于嫖宿幼女罪規(guī)制的犯罪行為分解到強(qiáng)奸罪和猥褻兒童罪中,修改兩罪的立法規(guī)定,更好的保護(hù)幼女的身心健康權(quán)益。
[Abstract]:The crime of whoring young girls has been controversial since it was established as an independent crime, and scholars have put forward different views on whether the crime should be abolished. With the continuous progress of the society, the legislative defects of the crime of whoring young girls gradually appear in the judicial practice, many cases involving the crime of whoring young girls can not be recognized by everyone, they think that the judgment is unfair, which has aroused public dissatisfaction. Lead to the crime of whoring young girls more fierce debate about the retention or abolition. This article starts with the legislative provisions of the crime of whoring young girls, compares the advantages and disadvantages of each point of view, further discusses the legislative problems existing in the crime of whoring young girls, analyzes the feasibility of abolishing the crime of whoring young girls, and the regulation of related acts after the abolition. This paper mainly discusses the abolition of the crime of whoring young girls from three parts: firstly, it introduces the current legislation, judicial status and different theories of the crime. The judgment of any charge is based on the understanding of a crime, so we must deeply evaluate the legislative history of the crime, the current legislative situation, and understand the connotation of the crime. If a crime wants to further reflect the value of its regulation of crime and give full play to its function, it must be applied to the judicial practice from the legislative provisions, but there are many difficulties in the judicial practice of the crime of whoring young girls. What is applicable is not ideal. Combining the legislative provisions of the crime of whoring with young girls and the problems in judicial application, many scholars have questioned whether the crime should continue to exist, which has caused the controversy between the existence and abolition of the crime, and put forward the theory of existence, abolition and explanation. Secondly, it discusses the necessity of abolishing the crime of whoring young girls. The reason why a crime is proposed by many scholars is that there are many legislative defects. This paper mainly discusses the problems existing in the legislative provisions of the crime from five aspects. First, although the original intention of legislation of the crime of whoring young girls is to protect the physical and mental health of young girls, the establishment of the crime not only does not reflect the original intention, but also deviates from it. Second, the crime of whoring young girls as a crime of criminal law, but did not follow the basic principles of criminal law. Third, from its own elements of crime, the establishment of the crime itself is contradictory and unreasonable. Fourth, compare the crime constitution between the crime of whoring and the crime of rape, and explain that the principle of dealing with it is not effective, and reflect the non-necessity of the existence of the crime of whoring. Fifth, the existence of the crime is also inconsistent with the basic principles of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Finally, based on the premise of the second part of the crime of whoring young girls, this paper discusses the path of the regulation of the related criminal behavior after the abolition of the crime of whoring. Summing up the provisions of foreign legislation on the crime of sexual abuse of young girls, for our country to regulate the crime of infringing young girls. Once the crime of whoring young girls is abolished, the harmfulness of related criminal acts still exists, and still needs to be regulated by the provisions of criminal law. Therefore, the author gives the opinion of amending the relevant articles: the crime that belongs to the regulation of the crime of whoring young girls is decomposed into the crime of rape and child molestation, and the legislative provisions of the two crimes are amended to better protect the rights and interests of the young girls' physical and mental health.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D924.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林立軍;對嫖宿幼女罪主觀上的明知應(yīng)如何認(rèn)識[J];檢察實(shí)踐;2005年02期

2 肖本山;趙穎;;嫖宿幼女罪取消論[J];行政與法;2008年01期

3 華臻;;嫖宿幼女罪廢除論[J];法制與社會;2009年20期

4 劉世萍;;從習(xí)水8.15案看廢止“嫖宿幼女罪”的必要性[J];貴州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2009年05期

5 韓旭至;;“嫖宿幼女罪”立法比較分析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2011年10期

6 劉艷梅;徐紅;;嫖宿幼女罪中“幼女”概念研究[J];中國性科學(xué);2012年05期

7 謝雪雁;;奸淫還是嫖宿——社會視野中的嫖宿幼女罪[J];法制與社會;2012年19期

8 葉竹盛;;廢除“嫖宿幼女罪”:錯(cuò)位的焦慮[J];南風(fēng)窗;2012年14期

9 楊峰;;淺析嫖宿幼女罪[J];知識經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年19期

10 譚明;;嫖宿幼女罪應(yīng)當(dāng)廢止[J];江西警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 江蘇睢寧 王威　(檢察人員);略陽淫案再證“嫖宿幼女罪”當(dāng)廢[N];東方早報(bào);2011年

2 楊濤;“嫖宿幼女罪”的法理與現(xiàn)實(shí)之辨[N];法制日報(bào);2011年

3 程奎星;“嫖宿幼女罪”讓法律蒙羞[N];中國婦女報(bào);2012年

4 李克杰;飽受質(zhì)疑的嫖宿幼女罪何以難廢除[N];濟(jì)南日報(bào);2012年

5 本報(bào)實(shí)習(xí)記者 葉俊;“嫖宿幼女罪”存廢之爭[N];民主與法制時(shí)報(bào);2012年

6 郭文婧;廢除“嫖宿幼女罪”價(jià)值導(dǎo)向重于量刑[N];嘉興日報(bào);2012年

7 本報(bào)記者 南儲鑫;“嫖宿幼女罪”存廢之爭再起波瀾[N];中國婦女報(bào);2013年

8 華南理工大學(xué)法學(xué)院副教授 夏正林;取消“嫖宿幼女罪”恐矯枉過正[N];廣州日報(bào);2013年

9 同濟(jì)大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授 金澤剛;“嫖宿幼女罪”應(yīng)當(dāng)廢除[N];東方早報(bào);2013年

10 安徽省某國企的管理者 法律顧問 朱永華;嫖宿幼女罪爭議 需用個(gè)案嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)來釋疑[N];人民法院報(bào);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 王院中;對嫖宿幼女罪的反思[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年

2 張金玲;嫖宿幼女罪立法批判與完善[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

3 高盼;論嫖宿幼女罪的完善[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

4 李媛;論嫖宿幼女罪應(yīng)予廢止[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

5 劉偉義;性權(quán)利視野下的嫖宿幼女罪研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

6 宋俐葭;嫖宿幼女罪廢除論[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

7 孟震;論嫖宿幼女罪[D];河南大學(xué);2013年

8 陳莉莉;嫖宿幼女罪的存廢之我見[D];中南民族大學(xué);2013年

9 茍娟;論廢除嫖宿幼女罪[D];大連海事大學(xué);2013年

10 肖丹琴;廢除嫖宿幼女罪的思考[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號：1875308