本文選題：風險社會 + 刑法價值　； 參考：《天津商業(yè)大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑法作為社會調(diào)控的有力手段,必定會對風險社會背景下的風險規(guī)制工作發(fā)揮至關(guān)重要的作用。不過,刑事法律因其社會定位而具有謙抑性的特點,決定了其不可能主動且全面地回應風險社會的各種需求,只能在社會防衛(wèi)的后發(fā)位置上,以其對自身運作方式的適當調(diào)適來有所作為。另外,刑事法律具有其自身一貫的歷史沿革和發(fā)展目標,即使期待其參與風險社會中的社會風險處理,也不應該以脫離其所一直依循的運行軌跡為代價。唯有如此,才能夠保證刑法的風險改革不因特定時期的社會需求而失卻本旨。概言之,必須理性看待刑事法律對于社會風險的規(guī)制作用,不但要從社會需求的層面理解刑法的社會適應,而且要從社會定位的角度考慮刑法的社會局限。根據(jù)現(xiàn)實所反映出的情況,風險社會對于刑法的價值期待過高于刑法自身可以延展的程度,至少對于安全價值的追求不應該以削弱刑法其他價值的社會影響為代價。因為穩(wěn)定的價值格局是刑法的存在基礎(chǔ),是刑法附隨于憲法并于其他法律規(guī)范保持一致的依據(jù)。一旦刑法的價值格局在風險改革中發(fā)生顛覆性的改變,必將導致刑法體系建構(gòu)的變更,或可背離刑法傳統(tǒng)路徑所期待的演進方向。這必定會影響到社會需求對于刑法職能運作的限制,混亂刑事法律與其他社會調(diào)控措施之間的關(guān)系,使刑法的社會角色變得模糊,刑法所具有的協(xié)調(diào)性和保障性也就會只能淪為其他社會調(diào)控措施的陪襯,混同于社會發(fā)展的不確定性之中。職是之故,刑法的風險改革必須把握刑法作為風險規(guī)制措施的局限性,通過對刑法內(nèi)外諸多因素的多維考察,對比刑法的傳統(tǒng)繼承與其時代變革之間的關(guān)系,明確其在基本立場不改變的情況下,可以向風險社會需求靠攏的程度。
[Abstract]:As a powerful means of social regulation, criminal law is bound to play a vital role in the risk regulation work under the risk social background. However, the criminal law has the characteristics of modesty because of its social orientation, which determines that it can not actively and comprehensively respond to various needs of the risk society, only in the post position of social defense. In addition, the criminal law has its own historical evolution and development goals. Even if it is expected to take part in the social risk management in a risky society, it should not be at the expense of the running track that it has always followed. Only in this way can the risk of criminal law be changed to guarantee the change of the risk of the criminal law. In a word, we must rationally look at the regulatory role of criminal law on social risk, not only to understand the social adaptation of the criminal law from the level of social demand, but also to consider the social limitations of the criminal law from the perspective of social orientation. The value expectation of the criminal law is higher than the extent that the criminal law can extend itself, at least the pursuit of the security value should not be at the expense of the social influence that undermines the other values of the criminal law. Because the stable value pattern is the basis for the existence of the criminal law, it is the basis for the criminal law to be attached to the Constitution and the other legal norms. The change of the value pattern in the reform of the risk reform will lead to the change of the construction of the criminal law system, or deviate from the direction of evolution expected by the traditional path of criminal law. This will inevitably affect the limitation of the social demand on the function of the criminal law, the relationship between the criminal law and other social regulation measures, and the social angle of the criminal law. The color becomes blurred, the coordination and the security of the criminal law can only be reduced to other social regulation and control measures, which are mixed with the uncertainty of social development. The relationship between the traditional inheritance of criminal law and its changes in the times is clear that it can move closer to the needs of the risk society without changing the basic position.

【學位授予單位】：天津商業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 楊春福;;風險社會的法理解讀[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2011年06期

2 張明楷;;“風險社會”若干刑法理論問題反思[J];法商研究;2011年05期

3 劉艷紅;;“風險刑法”理論不能動搖刑法謙抑主義[J];法商研究;2011年04期

4 陳興良;;“風險刑法”與刑法風險:雙重視角的考察[J];法商研究;2011年04期

5 田宏杰;;“風險社會”的刑法立場[J];法商研究;2011年04期

6 盧建平;;風險社會的刑事政策與刑法[J];法學論壇;2011年04期

7 勞東燕;;公共政策與風險社會的刑法[J];中國社會科學;2007年03期

，

本文編號：1873889