發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-11 08:31

  本文選題：見危不救 + 道德法律化��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái)，見危不救事件一直都出現(xiàn)在大眾的視野當(dāng)中，并且呈現(xiàn)出愈演愈烈之勢(shì)。見危不救這種現(xiàn)象的普遍存在，反映了現(xiàn)代社會(huì)人與人之間關(guān)系的冷漠、傳統(tǒng)道德遭遇的危機(jī)，威脅到人們生活的正常秩序，對(duì)和諧社會(huì)的影響極其惡劣。不管是在理論界還是實(shí)務(wù)界，見危不救入刑問(wèn)題一直都是備受關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。本文以見危不救具體發(fā)生事件為切入點(diǎn)，對(duì)見危不救行為入刑的必要性和合理性以及具體法律設(shè)置等方面均進(jìn)行了較為深入的論述。 本文共分六個(gè)部分，大約3萬(wàn)字左右，具體內(nèi)容如下： 論文第一部分是問(wèn)題的提出。這一部分通過(guò)對(duì)持續(xù)出現(xiàn)的事件的分析引出見危不救行為入刑的社會(huì)公眾態(tài)度和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義，從而為研究見危不救行為的犯罪化提供實(shí)踐依據(jù)和現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)。 論文第二部分是見危不救的概念及其理解。鑒于現(xiàn)有的關(guān)于見危不救的概念多為模糊不清或者范圍過(guò)廣，為能更嚴(yán)肅且科學(xué)地研究見危不救的犯罪化問(wèn)題，該章節(jié)在對(duì)見危不救中“見”的理解、“�！钡姆秶�、“救”的方式進(jìn)行了較為詳細(xì)論述的基礎(chǔ)上，在為見危不救的入刑進(jìn)行了條件限制的前提下，對(duì)見危不救作出了較為準(zhǔn)確且嚴(yán)密的定義，為下文的展開奠定了基礎(chǔ)。 論文第三部分是關(guān)于見危不救行為國(guó)內(nèi)外立法規(guī)定的介紹。這一部分通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)古代以及國(guó)際上關(guān)于見危不救行為的法律規(guī)定的介紹，說(shuō)明將見危不救入刑是有一定的歷史淵源的，無(wú)論是我國(guó)古代還是國(guó)外的立法規(guī)定對(duì)于我國(guó)刑法增設(shè)見危不救罪均有一定的借鑒意義。 論文第四部分對(duì)見危不救犯罪化的本質(zhì)進(jìn)行了分析。在這一部分中，筆者重點(diǎn)從人的屬性、和諧關(guān)系、精神文明等方面來(lái)說(shuō)明見危不救行為的社會(huì)危害性，而這也是見危不救入刑的必要性體現(xiàn)。往小了說(shuō)，見危不救威脅個(gè)人的生命健康；往大了說(shuō)，見危不救不利于社會(huì)和諧和穩(wěn)定，乃至整個(gè)人類的存續(xù)。 論文第五部分對(duì)見危不救入刑的合理性及可行性從理論根據(jù)方面進(jìn)行了分析。前半部分主要論證法律在適當(dāng)條件下可以介入道德調(diào)整領(lǐng)域，不作為犯罪中的作為義務(wù)適宜做實(shí)質(zhì)性解釋，，從而說(shuō)明見危不救犯罪化的正當(dāng)性。后半部分主要通過(guò)對(duì)人的社會(huì)屬性、本土文化與現(xiàn)代社會(huì)環(huán)境、刑法的謙抑性等方面的分析說(shuō)明了見危不救入刑的合理性。 論文第六部分是對(duì)見危不救犯罪化的立法設(shè)計(jì)。這一部分對(duì)見危不救犯罪化進(jìn)行了犯罪構(gòu)成和刑罰設(shè)置兩方面的立法設(shè)計(jì)，另外對(duì)救助者的保護(hù)也提出了相關(guān)建議。關(guān)于見危不救罪的犯罪構(gòu)成主要從四個(gè)要件的角度進(jìn)行了具體的論述；在刑罰設(shè)置中，筆者建議嚴(yán)格遵守罪刑相適應(yīng)和刑法謙抑性原則。此外，在保護(hù)救助人方面也提出了筆者的意見，從而盡量避免“好人難當(dāng)”的尷尬局面的出現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:In recent years, unrescuable incidents have always appeared in the field of vision of the masses, and are becoming more and more intense. The widespread existence of this phenomenon in danger reflects the indifference between people and people in the modern society, the crisis of the traditional moral encounter, the normal order of people's life, and the extremely bad influence on the harmonious society. In the theoretical and practical field, the question of "not saving in danger" has always been the focus of attention. This article is a breakthrough point in this paper, which is the starting point of the failure to save concrete events. The necessity and reasonableness as well as the specific legal setting are discussed in this paper.
This article is divided into six parts, about 3 words, and the details are as follows:
The first part of the paper is the proposal of the problem. Through the analysis of the continuing events, this part leads to the social public attitude and practical significance of the entry of dangerous and non rescue actions into punishment, so as to provide practical basis and practical basis for the study of the criminalization of dangerous and non rescuing behavior.
The second part of the paper is the concept and understanding of danger and non salvation. In view of the fact that the existing concept of danger and non rescue is mostly ambiguous or too wide, it is more serious and scientific to study the criminalization of danger and no rescue. This chapter is in the way of understanding the "see", the scope of "danger", and the way of "saving". On the basis of the detailed discussion, on the premise of limiting the conditions of entry into penalty for danger, it makes a more accurate and strict definition for the non rescue of danger, which lays a foundation for the following.
The third part of the paper is an introduction to the domestic and foreign legislative provisions of the act of danger and non salvation. This part, through the introduction of the legal provisions on the non rescue act of danger in ancient China and in the world, shows that there is a certain historical origin for the failure to save the sentence, whether it is the legislative provisions of our ancient or foreign countries and the criminal law of our country. It has certain reference significance to add the crime of danger and not rescue.
In the fourth part of the paper, the essence of the incriminalization of dangerous non rescue is analyzed. In this part, the author focuses on the social harmfulness of dangerous and non rescuing behavior from the aspects of human nature, harmonious relationship and spiritual civilization, and this is the embodiment of the necessity of failing to save the punishment. In the long run, danger is not conducive to social harmony and stability, and even to the survival of mankind as a whole.
The fifth part of the thesis makes an analysis of the reasonableness and feasibility of the danger of not saving into punishment from the theoretical basis. The first half of the article mainly demonstrates that the law can intervene in the field of moral adjustment under appropriate conditions, not as the obligation in the crime to make a substantial explanation, so as to explain the legitimacy of the failure to save the crime. The second half of the main part is the main part of the thesis. It is necessary to analyze the social nature of people, the local culture and modern social environment, and the restraint of criminal law.
The sixth part of the paper is the legislative design for the non salvation of the crisis. This part has made the legislative design of two aspects of the constitution of the crime and the setting up of the penalty for the non salvation of the danger, and also put forward some relevant suggestions on the protection of the rescuer. The constitution of the crime of danger and not rescuing is mainly discussed from the angle of four important elements. In the setting of punishment, the author suggests that the principle of adaptation to crime and the modesty of criminal law be strictly observed. In addition, the author's opinion is also put forward in the protection of the salvor so as to avoid the embarrassment of the "bad man".

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王劍波;郝艷兵;;道德法律化的限度及路徑分析——兼論道德義務(wù)能否成為不作為犯的作為義務(wù)來(lái)源[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年08期

2 黎宏;“見死不救”行為定性的法律分析[J];法商研究;2002年06期

3 隋亦可;;不作為犯罪若干問(wèn)題探析——從“宋福祥故意殺人案”談對(duì)不作為的理解[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年07期

4 云姣;;淺析“見危不救”入罪的合理性——從小悅悅事件談起[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年06期

5 劉旭;;轉(zhuǎn)型期維護(hù)社會(huì)穩(wěn)定的法治路徑[J];河北公安警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

6 張娟;;“見危不救罪”之刑法規(guī)制[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年05期

7 周志遠(yuǎn);;“見危不救”與刑事立法的謙抑性[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年06期

8 李依林;李朝;;對(duì)“見危不救”該不該入法的探討——以“小悅悅事件”為例[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2013年03期

9 楊莉莉;;關(guān)于“見危不救”的入刑思考——以“小悅悅事件”為視角[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年06期

10 談緒軍;楊佳彬;孫楠;;刑事政策視角下的見危不救犯罪化思考[J];改革與開放;2013年13期

本文編號(hào)：1873222