本文選題：利用影響力受賄罪 + 司法困境��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：利用影響力受賄罪是刑法修正案(七)增設(shè)的一個新罪名,旨在嚴(yán)厲打擊愈演愈烈的國家工作人員的關(guān)系密切人受賄現(xiàn)象。但是在八年多的司法實踐中,利用影響力受賄罪的案件并不多,且由于犯罪構(gòu)成要件的個別概念含義模糊、操作性不強,與斡旋型受賄罪存在容易混淆的狀況,司法人員在實踐中較難把握適用,在司法實踐中問題很多。本文分為四個部分對利用影響力受賄罪在司法實踐中的困境及如何應(yīng)對進行研究:第一部分,利用影響力受賄罪的規(guī)范構(gòu)成。主要介紹了利用影響力受賄罪的立法背景、意義及犯罪構(gòu)成要件,從總體上對本罪的主體、行為方式進行梳理。第二部分,利用影響力受賄罪的司法困境。主要通過實證研究的方法對利用影響力受賄罪在司法實踐中存在的問題進行闡述,包括罪名的低利用率、與斡旋型受賄罪存在定性爭議的問題。-第三部分,利用影響力受賄罪司法困境的成因。分別從立法和司法兩個層面分析導(dǎo)致問題的原因。立法層面的原因包括"為請托人謀取不正當(dāng)利益"限制了打擊面、"關(guān)系密切人"的界定不清、與斡旋型受賄罪的界限不清;司法層面的原因包括案件線索發(fā)現(xiàn)難、證據(jù)獲取固定難、案件初查不充分、偵查模式單一、與公訴部門缺少溝通配合、辦案干警能力有待提高、辦案阻力大。第四部分,利用影響力受賄罪司法困境的應(yīng)對之策。與第三部分相對應(yīng),分別從立法和司法兩個層面提出對策。立法層面的對策包括取消"為請托人謀取不正當(dāng)利益"這一要件、明確"近親屬"及"其他關(guān)系密切人"的范圍、與斡旋型受賄罪合并成新的一罪;司法層面的對策包括拓寬案件線索來源渠道、把好證據(jù)關(guān)和及時固證、強化初查工作、科技引領(lǐng)偵查、公訴部門提前介入審查、加強偵查業(yè)務(wù)培訓(xùn)、強化監(jiān)督、發(fā)布指導(dǎo)性案例。
[Abstract]:The crime of accepting bribes with influence is a new crime in the amendment of Criminal Law (7), which aims to crack down severely on the phenomenon of bribery of close people who are closely related to state functionaries. However, in more than eight years of judicial practice, there are not many cases using influence to accept bribes, and because the individual concept of the elements of the crime is vague and operational, it is easy to be confused with the crime of good offices. It is difficult for judicial personnel to grasp the application in practice, and there are many problems in judicial practice. This article is divided into four parts to study the predicament and how to deal with the crime of bribery with influence in the judicial practice: the first part, the normative constitution of bribery crime with influence. This paper mainly introduces the legislative background, significance and elements of the crime of accepting bribes with influence, and generally combs the subject and behavior of the crime. The second part, the use of influence bribery crime of the judicial dilemma. Mainly through the method of empirical research to use the influence of bribery in the judicial practice of the problems, including the low utilization rate of charges, and the mediation crime of bribery there is a qualitative dispute between the question .- the third part, The causes of the Judicial predicament of bribery Crime by using influence. Respectively from the legislative and judicial levels to analyze the causes of the problem. The reasons at the legislative level include: "seeking improper interests for the trustee" limits the scope of the attack, the definition of "close person" is unclear, and the boundary between the crime of mediation bribery is not clear, and the judicial level includes the difficulty of finding the case clue. It is difficult to obtain the evidence, the initial investigation of the case is not sufficient, the investigation mode is single, the communication and cooperation with the public prosecution department is lacking, the ability of the police to handle the case needs to be improved, and the resistance to handling the case is great. The fourth part, take advantage of the influence of bribery crime to deal with the judicial dilemma. Corresponding to the third part, respectively from the legislative and judicial two levels of countermeasures. The countermeasures at the legislative level include abolishing the element of "seeking improper interests for the trustee", clarifying the scope of "close relatives" and "other close persons", and merging with the crime of mediation bribery into a new crime; The countermeasures at the judicial level include broadening the channels of case clue sources, closing the evidence and consolidating the evidence in time, strengthening the work of initial investigation, leading the investigation by science and technology, intervening in the examination in advance by the public prosecution department, strengthening the training of the investigation business, and strengthening the supervision. Issue guidance cases.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.392

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄒慶勇;;論我國行政效率低下的原因及其解決對策[J];科技信息(科學(xué)教研);2007年17期

2 王帥;;關(guān)于實施《中華人民共和國農(nóng)業(yè)機械化促進法》的難點和對策[J];中國農(nóng)機化;2008年03期

3 陳恭健,王勝芳;委托執(zhí)行難的原因及其對策探析[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年01期

4 秦亞芹;于鵬;;干部駐村制度實施中存在的問題及對策——以2012年河北省基層建設(shè)年活動為例[J];北京農(nóng)業(yè);2013年36期

5 楊向東;;關(guān)于解決農(nóng)民工欠薪問題的思考及對策[J];新疆農(nóng)墾經(jīng)濟;2012年03期

6 趙金河;;失地農(nóng)民面臨的困難及解決對策[J];現(xiàn)代交際;2009年08期

7 袁野;;解析我國刑法修正案立法的問題及對策[J];今日中國論壇;2013年01期

8 劉維增;;職務(wù)犯罪案件初查過程中存在的問題及解決對策[J];民營科技;2010年10期

9 王曉東;;公務(wù)員職業(yè)發(fā)展倦怠和解決對策[J];黑龍江科技信息;2007年11期

10 程全偉;趙晨宇;;大學(xué)生社會主義核心價值觀探析[J];新西部(理論版);2013年09期

相關(guān)會議論文 前2條

1 李斌;羅世明;;當(dāng)前學(xué)會面臨的困難與解決對策探析[A];學(xué)習(xí)貫徹黨的十八大精神，，推動學(xué)會學(xué)術(shù)工作創(chuàng)新發(fā)展——中西南學(xué)會學(xué)研究第31屆年會論文集[C];2013年

2 魏智敏;;水!水!水!——建設(shè)沿海經(jīng)濟強省的水資源可持續(xù)利用對策研討[A];“科學(xué)發(fā)展觀與沿海經(jīng)濟”高層論壇暨省專家獻策服務(wù)團換屆大會論文集[C];2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 侯劍婷;城市農(nóng)民工住房問題及對策研究[D];北華大學(xué);2015年

2 劉士局;棋盤站安全問題分析及解決對策[D];蘭州交通大學(xué);2016年

3 肖雅文;利用影響力受賄罪的司法困境與應(yīng)對[D];山東大學(xué);2017年

4 曹雯菁（Judy Cao）;老齡化背景下的臨終關(guān)懷問題研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2015年

5 潘峰;我國中小企業(yè)融資難問題研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2014年

本文編號：1869614