本文選題：扒竊 + 結(jié)果犯�。� 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：《刑法修正案（八）》將扒竊、入戶盜竊、攜帶兇器盜竊作為盜竊罪的幾種特殊行為類型入罪。行為人扒竊，不要求達(dá)到數(shù)額較大或情節(jié)嚴(yán)重，便可以按照盜竊罪處罰。本次修改具有標(biāo)志性的意義，不僅體現(xiàn)了我國寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)的刑事政策，而且體現(xiàn)了我國保護(hù)人民群眾、保障社會公共秩序等各方面的訴求。從立法論的角度說，扒竊被納入犯罪受到一些質(zhì)疑，認(rèn)為扒竊入罪是刑事立法功利化和刑法萬能理念的體現(xiàn)。從解釋論的角度說，既然扒竊已經(jīng)入罪，如何正確適用扒竊的規(guī)定才是刑法理論和司法實(shí)踐面臨的重要問題。本文主要從解釋論的角度對扒竊進(jìn)行分析。從扒竊的性質(zhì)入手，分析扒竊的行為要素和結(jié)果要素。對扒竊行為發(fā)生的地點(diǎn)特征即“公共場所”與“公共交通工具”和扒竊的對象特征即他人“隨身攜帶”的財物進(jìn)行界定。從扒竊的結(jié)果來分析扒竊的成立標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和扒竊的既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，并對扒竊的未遂進(jìn)行分析。最后對扒竊的司法認(rèn)定進(jìn)行闡述。希望可以為扒竊在司法實(shí)踐中的認(rèn)定提供一些參考。全文共分為四個部分。 第一部分是扒竊行為的性質(zhì)。分析行為犯和結(jié)果犯的劃分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。認(rèn)為我國區(qū)分行為犯和結(jié)果犯的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是“既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)說”。進(jìn)而闡述扒竊是一種結(jié)果犯。扒竊犯罪的既遂，不但要有行為要素，還要有結(jié)果要素。 第二部分是扒竊的行為要素。對扒竊行為實(shí)施的地點(diǎn)特征即“公共場所”和“公共交通工具”以及扒竊的對象特征“隨身攜帶”的財物進(jìn)行界定。認(rèn)為“公共場所”和“公共交通工具”的本質(zhì)特征是人員的高度流通性和人員的不特定性，與人數(shù)的多少無關(guān)�！半S身攜帶”包括財物的所有人或者占有人帶在身上或者放在身體附近的財物。對扒竊的行為方式進(jìn)行分析。認(rèn)為扒竊不要求行為人具有慣常性，也不要求秘密竊取，更不要求扒竊行為的手段具有技術(shù)性。 第三部分是扒竊的結(jié)果要素。作為扒竊結(jié)果要素的財物，既可以是具有交換價值的財物，也可以是具有使用價值的財物；既可以是體積較小的財物，也可以是體積較大的財物。通過分析有關(guān)盜竊罪既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的學(xué)說，認(rèn)為扒竊犯罪的既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)采取“控制說”。進(jìn)而分析行為人實(shí)施扒竊后，未取得刑法所保護(hù)的財物的，是盜竊未遂。 第四部分是扒竊的司法認(rèn)定。認(rèn)為認(rèn)定扒竊應(yīng)該與《刑法》第十三條但書協(xié)調(diào)適用。作為轉(zhuǎn)化型搶劫前提條件的扒竊行為，沒有數(shù)額要求，也不需要構(gòu)成犯罪既遂。對扒竊不承擔(dān)刑事責(zé)任的未成年人不是扒竊轉(zhuǎn)化為搶劫罪的主體。 最后是結(jié)論部分，，在該部分對自己的基本觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:The amendment of criminal law (8) criminalizes pickpocketing, burglary inside the house and theft with murder weapon as several special types of larceny. The perpetrator of pickpocketing, do not require a large amount or serious circumstances, can be punished in accordance with the crime of larceny. This amendment has iconic significance, not only reflects our country's criminal policy of combining leniency and severity, but also embodies the demands of protecting the masses of the people and ensuring the social public order in our country. From the point of view of legislation, it is questioned that pickpocketing is included in the crime, and that the crime of pickpocketing is the embodiment of the utilitarianism of criminal legislation and the omnipotent idea of criminal law. From the angle of explanation, since pickpocketing has already been criminalized, how to apply the provisions of pickpocketing correctly is an important problem in criminal law theory and judicial practice. This paper mainly analyzes pickpocketing from the angle of explanation theory. Starting with the nature of pickpocketing, this paper analyzes the behavioral and result elements of pickpocketing. This paper defines the local characteristics of pickpocketing, that is, "public place" and "public transportation", and the object of pickpocketing, that is, the property that others "carry with them". From the result of pickpocketing, this paper analyzes the criterion of establishing pickpocketing and the accomplished standard of pickpocketing, and analyzes the attempted pickpocketing. Finally, the judicial identification of pickpocketing is expounded. Hope to provide some reference for pickpocketing in judicial practice. The full text is divided into four parts. The first part is the nature of pickpocketing. The classification standard of behavior crime and result crime is analyzed. The author thinks that the criterion of distinguishing the crime of act from the crime of consequence is the criterion of accomplishment. Furthermore, it is expounded that pickpocketing is a consequential crime. The crime of pickpocketing must have not only the elements of behavior, but also the elements of result. The second part is the behavior elements of pickpocketing. This paper defines the local characteristics of pickpocketing, that is, "public place" and "public transportation", as well as the object feature of pickpocketing. It is considered that the essential characteristics of "public places" and "public transportation" are the high mobility of personnel and the non-specificity of personnel, which has nothing to do with the number of people. "carry with you" includes property that the owner or possessor carries on or near the body. Analyze the behavior of pickpocketing. It is concluded that pickpocketing does not require the perpetrator to have habituation, nor secret theft, nor does it require the means of pickpocketing to be technical. The third part is the result elements of pickpocketing. As a result of pickpocketing, the property can be the property with exchange value, the property with use value, the property with small volume or the property with larger volume. Based on the analysis of the theory about the accomplished standard of larceny, the author thinks that the accomplished standard of pickpocket crime adopts the theory of control. It is attempted theft that the perpetrator does not obtain the property protected by the criminal law after he carries out pickpocketing. The fourth part is the judicial cognizance of pickpocketing. It is believed that the identification of pickpocketing should be coordinated with the proviso of Article 13 of the Criminal Law. Pickpocketing, which is the precondition of transformed robbery, has no requirement of amount, and does not constitute a crime accomplished. Minors who do not bear criminal responsibility for pickpocketing are not the subject of the crime of pickpocketing. Finally is the conclusion part, in this part has carried on the summary to own basic viewpoint.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李�；�,童偉華;論行為犯的構(gòu)造[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年06期

2 蘇彩霞;危險犯及其相關(guān)概念之辨析——兼評刑法分則第116條與第119條第1款之關(guān)系[J];法學(xué)評論;2001年03期

3 王志祥;張偉珂;;盜竊罪新增行為方式評析[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年05期

4 陳志軍;翟金鵬;;扒竊行為特征與追訴標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的司法認(rèn)定研究[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2013年03期

5 徐貴銀;;論刑法中的“公共場所”[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年05期

6 張仁杰;;盜竊罪既遂與未遂的司法認(rèn)定[J];中國檢察官;2013年02期

7 王麗超;;如何理解盜竊罪中的“扒竊”[J];中國檢察官;2013年12期

8 許文輝;張明楷;冀祥德;馮瑩;羅欣;張子強(qiáng);陳昕;;扒竊行為如何適用法律[J];人民檢察;2013年08期

9 伍繼純;;扒竊犯罪本益論[J];云南警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年03期

10 蘇彩霞;結(jié)果犯理論的反思及界定[J];中國刑事法雜志;2000年01期

本文編號：1857068