本文選題：刑法偏好 + 刑法輕重　； 參考：《中國社會科學(xué)》2017年01期

【摘要】：民眾偏好較重還是較輕的刑法,以及如何處理刑法與民意的關(guān)系,是刑事法治不能回避的問題。搭載北京大學(xué)CFPS項目,以3萬多樣本為數(shù)據(jù)來源的實證研究發(fā)現(xiàn),中國民眾的刑法偏好系數(shù)低于0到1之間的中間線,為0.36,說明大樣本研究的證據(jù)并不支持中國民眾普遍偏好重法的說法;傳統(tǒng)犯罪被害遭遇對刑法偏好并無顯著影響,刑法偏好是各種社會因素的扭曲反映。應(yīng)當對與刑法有關(guān)的個案輿論保持高度審慎和冷靜,對刑法偏好作出有限響應(yīng),警惕刑法的過度社會化和刑法資源的"通脹"傾向。刑事立法或司法是否積極響應(yīng)民眾的某種刑法偏好,取決于代表性、溯因性和依法性三方面的考量。個案輿論更需先通過實證研究轉(zhuǎn)換成某種刑法偏好,經(jīng)過上述三方面考量后,再決定是否以及如何響應(yīng)。
[Abstract]:People's preference for heavier or lighter criminal law, and how to deal with the relationship between criminal law and public opinion, is an unavoidable problem. An empirical study based on more than 30, 000 samples from Peking University's CFPS project found that the criminal preference coefficient of the Chinese people is below the middle line between 0 and 1. The result is 0.36, which shows that the evidence of large sample study does not support the view that the Chinese people generally prefer to emphasize the law; the traditional crime victimization has no significant influence on the criminal law preference, and the criminal law preference is a distorted reflection of various social factors. We should keep a high degree of prudence and calm to the public opinion concerning criminal law, make a limited response to the preference of criminal law, be on guard against the excessive socialization of criminal law and the tendency of "inflation" of criminal law resources. Whether criminal legislation or judicature responds positively to some kind of criminal law preference depends on the consideration of representativeness, retroactivity and lawfulness. The case public opinion needs to transform into some kind of criminal law preference through empirical research, and then decide whether and how to respond after considering the above three aspects.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D924.1
，

本文編號：1855865