本文選題：原因自由行為 + 責(zé)任主義��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】："原因自由行為"乃為刑法學(xué)的一個(gè)熱點(diǎn)課題,這個(gè)問(wèn)題從產(chǎn)生至今受到了廣泛的關(guān)注。該類(lèi)行為具有可罰性已經(jīng)到了學(xué)界的廣泛認(rèn)可,但是一旦承認(rèn)其可罰,就會(huì)違背責(zé)任主義的同時(shí)性原則。同時(shí)性原則要求"實(shí)行行為與責(zé)任能力同時(shí)存在",原因自由行為卻恰恰不符合這個(gè)條件。二者之間存在的這種沖突至今沒(méi)有找到完美的方法去解決。原因自由行為種類(lèi)多樣,除了公認(rèn)的醉酒犯罪之外還包括其他情形。而且其與一般的犯罪不同,它具有特殊的行為構(gòu)成和心理特點(diǎn),是需要解決的疑難問(wèn)題。因此,基于對(duì)刑法理論所做的全面性考量,有必要借由刑事立法來(lái)尋求解決之道。文章共分為五個(gè)部分,即:第一部分是文章的引言。引言,問(wèn)題的提出和展開(kāi)。原因自由行為自產(chǎn)生之初就受到了廣泛關(guān)注。其與責(zé)任主義之間的沖突至今沒(méi)有找到最適合的解決方式。目前各國(guó)均從理論和立法兩方面對(duì)該行為做了規(guī)定,但都存在問(wèn)題。雖然我國(guó)沒(méi)有責(zé)任主義原則這一說(shuō),但是主客觀相統(tǒng)一的原則與責(zé)任主義之間具有相似之處,因此有必要探討一下我國(guó)的刑法理論及立法對(duì)原因自由行為的規(guī)定。第二部分責(zé)任主義原則中,筆者從責(zé)任主義的定義、內(nèi)容、要素以及原則的機(jī)能幾個(gè)方面展開(kāi)討論。通過(guò)這部分的理論介紹,對(duì)責(zé)任主義做一個(gè)全面的了解。第三部分是原因自由行為理論概述部分。首先對(duì)原因自由行為做一個(gè)準(zhǔn)確的定義,對(duì)該行為做一個(gè)大體的了解。之后通過(guò)詳細(xì)介紹該理論的產(chǎn)生及發(fā)展歷程、特征、具體內(nèi)容等,構(gòu)建了一個(gè)較為詳盡的理論體系,從而為后面討論與責(zé)任主義的沖突及解決做鋪墊。第四部分主要討論了原因自由行為與責(zé)任主義沖突的解決。首先從兩方面講述了沖突的主要表現(xiàn),之后講述了矛盾的協(xié)調(diào)方法。在這一部分,筆者先探討了要對(duì)矛盾進(jìn)行協(xié)調(diào)的理論基礎(chǔ),接著講述了目前學(xué)界對(duì)于協(xié)調(diào)二者之間矛盾所提出的學(xué)說(shuō)和方式。通過(guò)分析這幾種方式,了解各自的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn),以此提出筆者自己的看法。第五部分首先探討了目前世界各國(guó)的立法現(xiàn)狀,并就在立法上具有代表性的國(guó)家進(jìn)行了比較詳細(xì)的介紹。之后著眼于我國(guó)的理論和立法現(xiàn)狀,討論了目前我國(guó)立法上存在的問(wèn)題,并對(duì)我國(guó)的立法完善提出了自己的意見(jiàn)。
[Abstract]:"cause free action" is a hot topic in criminal law, which has received extensive attention since it came into being. This kind of behavior has been widely accepted by scholars, but once it is recognized, it will violate the principle of simultaneous liability. The principle of synchronism requires that "act of practice and capacity of responsibility exist at the same time", but freedom of action does not meet this condition. The conflict between the two has so far failed to find a perfect solution. There are a variety of reasons for free behavior, including other situations in addition to recognized drunken crimes. And it is different from ordinary crime, it has the special behavior constitution and the psychological characteristic, is the difficult question which needs to solve. Therefore, based on the comprehensive consideration of the theory of criminal law, it is necessary to seek a solution by criminal legislation. The article is divided into five parts, namely: the first part is the introduction of the article. Introduction, the question raised and unfolded. The cause of free behavior has been widely concerned since the beginning of its emergence. The conflict with the doctrine of responsibility has yet to find the most suitable solution. At present, the behavior has been regulated in both theory and legislation, but there are still some problems. Although there is no principle of responsibility in China, the principle of unity of subjectivity and objectivity is similar to the principle of responsibility. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the provisions of the theory of criminal law and the legislation on the free act of reason in our country. In the second part, the author discusses the definition, content, elements and the function of the principle. Through this part of the theoretical introduction, to do a comprehensive understanding of the doctrine of responsibility. The third part is an overview of the theory of cause-free behavior. First of all, to make a precise definition of the cause of free behavior, to do a general understanding of the behavior. After that, a detailed theoretical system is constructed by introducing the origin and development course, characteristics and concrete contents of the theory in detail, thus paving the way for the later discussion on the conflict between the theory and responsibilism and its solution. The fourth part mainly discusses the solution of the conflict between free action and responsibility. First, the main manifestations of the conflict are described from two aspects, and then the conflict coordination method is described. In this part, the author first discusses the theoretical basis for the coordination of contradictions, and then describes the current academic theories and ways to coordinate the contradictions between the two. Through the analysis of these ways, understand their advantages and disadvantages, and put forward my own views. The fifth part firstly discusses the current legislation situation of the countries in the world, and introduces the representative countries in legislation in detail. Then focusing on the current situation of our country's theory and legislation, this paper discusses the existing problems in our country's legislation, and puts forward our own opinions on the perfection of our country's legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 裴王建;淺論原因自由行為[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

2 陳家林;也論原因自由行為——與齊文遠(yuǎn)、劉代華先生商榷[J];政法論叢;2000年01期

3 陳家林;;也論原因自由行為——與齊文遠(yuǎn)、劉代華先生商榷[J];法學(xué)家;2000年06期

4 馬松健,陳慶安;原因自由行為的理論出路[J];河南公安高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

5 鐘連福;原因自由行為主觀方面探討[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

6 李傳學(xué);;淺談原因自由行為理論中的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];山東大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2004年00期

7 吳剛;崔現(xiàn)偉;;原因自由行為探微[J];邢臺(tái)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

8 陳立成;;再談原因自由行為與相關(guān)精神疾病的司法精神醫(yī)學(xué)鑒定[J];上海精神醫(yī)學(xué);2007年06期

9 蘇秦;;德國(guó)刑法原因自由行為理論的綜述[J];滄桑;2011年02期

10 李珩嘉;;我國(guó)原因自由行為的立法思考[J];文史月刊;2012年08期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 汪志良;;論原因自由行為與相關(guān)精神疾病的司法精神醫(yī)學(xué)鑒定[A];2006年浙江省精神病學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2006年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 河北省高碑店市人民檢察院 杜林 徐美華;刑法中應(yīng)引入“原因自由行為”規(guī)定[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

2 湖北省襄陽(yáng)市人民檢察院 呂昊;醉酒后犯罪的主觀惡性比較[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 孫麗;論原因自由行為[D];貴州大學(xué);2008年

2 林培曉;論原因自由行為[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

3 周樹(shù)群;淺論原因自由行為[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

4 高倩婧;論原因自由行為的著手[D];中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院;2011年

5 付想兵;論原因自由行為[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

6 葛朋飛;原因自由行為研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2005年

7 郝慶富;刑法中的原因自由行為理論研究[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

8 李亞飛;論原因自由行為[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

9 何宜瞳;原因自由行為問(wèn)題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2009年

10 李耀;原因自由行為著手理論問(wèn)題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1840813