本文選題：刑法修正 + 立法觀��； 參考：《法學評論》2017年06期

【摘要】：晚近二十年我國刑法立法修正表現(xiàn)出三種明顯的態(tài)勢,即處罰范圍的不斷擴張、處罰上的日趨從嚴與立法條款的概括化發(fā)展。這三種態(tài)勢與應對隨風險社會的到來而面臨的立法挑戰(zhàn)有關。風險社會中刑法立法面臨的挑戰(zhàn)包括:要求全方位地規(guī)制風險并形成一套整體性的治理策略,對風險進行準確預測與評估以確保預防機制的有效發(fā)揮,以及對預防機制所可能帶來的弱化法治國保障的風險進行反思性的控制。既有的刑法立法所做的應對舉措帶來重要的后果,不僅刑法所重點關注的犯罪類型呈現(xiàn)結構性的改變,刑法與其他法規(guī)范系統(tǒng)(尤其是行政法)之間的關系也經(jīng)歷了重大的轉變,而傳統(tǒng)刑法理論的一些基本準則或教義則遭到突破或規(guī)避。功能主義的刑法立法觀能夠適應風險社會的規(guī)范性需求。它包含三個面向的內容,即積極介入的立法導向、追求預防效果的立法導向與注重靈活回應的立法導向。這三個面向各自可能制造相應的風險�；诖�,對功能主義的刑法立法觀有必要進行適當?shù)恼{控:理性的刑法立法應當以對風險的科學預測與評估為基礎;應當擺脫單純的控制思維,在整合權利保障思維的同時進行全面的利益衡量;應當采用多軌制的刑法立法模式,以緩解立法的穩(wěn)定性與靈活性之間的緊張。
[Abstract]:In the last two decades, there are three obvious trends in the legislative amendment of criminal law in China, namely, the continuous expansion of the scope of punishment, the increasingly severe punishment and the general development of the legislative provisions. These three trends are related to dealing with the legislative challenges faced with the arrival of a risky society. The challenges of criminal law legislation in a risk society include: to regulate risks in all directions and form a set of integrated governance strategies to accurately predict and evaluate risks to ensure the effective use of the prevention mechanism. And the risk of weakening the guarantee of rule of law may be controlled by preventive mechanism. The countermeasures made by the existing criminal law legislation have brought about important consequences, not only the types of crimes that the criminal law focuses on are structural changes, The relationship between criminal law and other legal systems, especially administrative law, has also undergone a major change, while some basic principles or doctrines of traditional criminal law theory have been broken through or circumvented. Functionalist view of criminal law legislation can adapt to the normative needs of risk society. It consists of three aspects, namely, the active intervention of the legislative direction, the pursuit of preventive effect of the legislative direction and the focus on flexible response of the legislative direction. Each of these three faces may create corresponding risks. Therefore, it is necessary to regulate the functionalist view of criminal law legislation: rational criminal law legislation should be based on the scientific prediction and assessment of risks, and should get rid of pure control thinking. In order to alleviate the tension between the stability and flexibility of legislation, we should adopt a multi-system criminal law legislation model.
【作者單位】： 清華大學法學院;
【分類號】：D924.1

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 羅志堅;非法進行節(jié)育手術罪探析——兼論維護刑事立法觀的統(tǒng)一[J];求實;2000年06期

2 李可;;從《關于林木盜竊法的辯論》看馬克思的森林立法觀[J];林業(yè)經(jīng)濟問題;2006年04期

3 李可;;馬克思的森林立法觀——以《關于林木盜竊法的辯論》為主要分析對象[J];法商研究;2006年02期

4 單佳;;從婚姻法看唐律倫理立法觀與我國現(xiàn)代刑法[J];蘭臺世界;2013年23期

，

本文編號：1840168