本文選題：尋釁滋事 + 起哄鬧事��； 參考：《南京師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：尋釁滋事罪源于1979年刑法第160條規(guī)定的流氓罪。1997年刑法第293條規(guī)定的尋釁滋事罪有四種表現(xiàn)形式,相比較前三種,第四種起哄鬧事型的案件數(shù)量相對(duì)較少。但是,起哄鬧事型尋釁滋事罪在文字表述上抽象性較強(qiáng),理解較困難,在實(shí)踐中容易出現(xiàn)司法認(rèn)定上的差錯(cuò)。本文就是基于刑法謙抑性原則和明確性原則,研究起哄鬧事型尋釁滋事罪在司法認(rèn)定上存在的諸多爭(zhēng)議和問題,明確該罪的性質(zhì)和特征,界定其適用范圍,厘清罪與非罪、此罪與彼罪的界限,增強(qiáng)司法實(shí)踐的可操作性,保障公民權(quán)利。本文共分為五章。第一章為概述,首先介紹起哄鬧事型尋釁滋事罪的淵源,評(píng)析廢止論和保留論的觀點(diǎn),提出目前不應(yīng)廢除尋釁滋事罪。第二章闡述該罪的構(gòu)成要件。本章對(duì)公共場(chǎng)所、公共場(chǎng)所秩序、起哄鬧事等關(guān)鍵詞的內(nèi)涵展開分析,提出起哄鬧事行為具有煽動(dòng)性、公然性、擴(kuò)展性的特征,明確流氓動(dòng)機(jī)是尋釁滋事罪的主觀要素。第三章研究該罪的適用問題,即對(duì)該罪在司法實(shí)踐中常被適用于規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)造謠傳謠行為和非正常上訪行為進(jìn)行研究。本章結(jié)合兩高司法解釋,提出網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間屬于公共場(chǎng)所,但“造成公共秩序嚴(yán)重混亂”中的公共秩序應(yīng)限制解釋為現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)的公共秩序;可結(jié)合比例原則來處理言論自由與公共秩序的沖突問題;對(duì)有嚴(yán)重社會(huì)危害性的非正常上訪中的起哄鬧事型尋釁滋事行為應(yīng)當(dāng)依法定罪量刑。第四章論述起哄鬧事型尋釁滋事罪與相關(guān)聚眾類犯罪、編造、故意傳播虛假恐怖信息罪、擾亂國(guó)家機(jī)關(guān)工作秩序罪等易混淆罪名之間的界限,提出可用想象競(jìng)合犯的處罰原則來處理該罪與相關(guān)犯罪之間的關(guān)系。第五章分析該罪的司法現(xiàn)狀,提出應(yīng)當(dāng)從立法和司法兩個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)進(jìn)行改進(jìn)。
[Abstract]:The crime of provoking and causing trouble originates from the crime of hooliganism stipulated in Article 160 of the Criminal Law of 1979. There are four forms of the crime of provoking trouble as stipulated in Article 293 of the Criminal Law of 1997. Compared with the first three types, the number of cases of the fourth type of disturbance is relatively small. However, the crime of causing trouble by hooting is abstract in words and difficult to understand. It is easy to make mistakes in judicial cognizance in practice. Based on the principle of modesty and clarity of criminal law, this paper studies many disputes and problems in the judicial cognizance of the crime of causing disturbances, clarifies the nature and characteristics of the crime, defines its scope of application, and clarifies the crime and non-crime. The boundary between this crime and that crime strengthens the operability of judicial practice and protects the civil rights. This paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is an overview, first of all, it introduces the origin of the crime of hooting and causing trouble, comments on the views of abolition theory and reservation theory, and points out that the crime of provoking and causing trouble should not be abolished at present. The second chapter expounds the constitutive elements of the crime. This chapter analyzes the connotation of public places, public places order, hooting and other key words, puts forward that the hooting behavior has the characteristics of sedition, publicity and expansibility, and clarifies that the motive of hooliganism is the subjective element of the crime of provoking and causing trouble. The third chapter studies the application of the crime, that is, the crime in judicial practice is often applied to regulate the network rumour spreading behavior and abnormal petition behavior. This chapter combines the two high judicial interpretation, proposed that the cyberspace belongs to the public place, but the public order in "cause the public order serious confusion" should be limited to the real society public order; The conflict between freedom of speech and public order can be dealt with in combination with the principle of proportionality; The fourth chapter discusses the boundary between the crime of hooting and causing trouble and the crime of gathering a crowd, fabricating, deliberately disseminating false terrorist information, disturbing the work order of state organs, and so on. This paper puts forward the punishment principle of imaginative concurrence crime to deal with the relation between the crime and the related crime. The fifth chapter analyzes the current situation of the crime and puts forward that it should be improved from the two aspects of legislation and judicature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 范玉才;梁超;;尋釁滋事罪犯罪客體的新定位[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年03期

2 薛漢荻;;“行為—后果”鏈條與“公共場(chǎng)所秩序嚴(yán)重混亂”的認(rèn)定——“口袋罪”視域下非法上訪人員尋釁滋事案件證據(jù)審查要旨[J];山西師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年04期

3 陳興良;;尋釁滋事罪的法教義學(xué)形象:以起哄鬧事為中心展開[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2015年03期

4 商浩文;劉明哲;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)造謠型尋釁滋事罪的司法適用[J];河南警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年03期

5 謝治東;薛章原;;論尋釁滋事罪的邊界[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年03期

6 張千帆;;刑法適用應(yīng)遵循憲法的基本精神——以“尋釁滋事”的司法解釋為例[J];法學(xué);2015年04期

7 蒙開熙;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)尋釁滋事犯罪概念要素解讀[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年03期

8 北京市檢察機(jī)關(guān)街頭擾序類犯罪法律適用問題研究課題組;田向紅;許文輝;何濱;郭瑋;;街頭擾序類犯罪法律適用問題研究[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2015年03期

9 傅躍建;;論“網(wǎng)絡(luò)尋釁滋事”的刑法規(guī)制[J];江西警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年06期

10 趙秉志;徐文文;;論我國(guó)編造、傳播虛假信息的刑法規(guī)制[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2014年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 曲新久;;一個(gè)較為科學(xué)合理的刑法解釋[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

2 曹作和;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)造謠為何涉尋釁滋事罪[N];北京日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 丁佳;網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言的刑事責(zé)任認(rèn)定[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

2 郭彥;“起哄鬧事型”尋釁滋事罪研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1826590