本文選題：正犯 + 限制正犯　； 參考：《法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報)》2017年05期

【摘要】：正犯概念之教義學(xué)功能在于解決犯罪參與者構(gòu)成要件符合性之問題,主犯概念的教義學(xué)功能則在于量刑,我國關(guān)于共犯之刑事立法具有多重解釋的空間,單一制抑或區(qū)分制的解釋結(jié)論都不違背現(xiàn)行立法;以重要作用說與行為支配論為代表之當今德日學(xué)理上正犯概念的實質(zhì)化傾向,使得正犯概念的教義學(xué)功能發(fā)生了異化,不僅面臨體系內(nèi)部邏輯自洽的難題,亦暴露出以德日為代表的區(qū)分制立法模式之弊端;在限制正犯概念立場下,通過對正犯進行形式化之解讀,建構(gòu)正犯、主犯分離體系,不僅合乎現(xiàn)行立法之規(guī)定,亦可確保正犯、主犯各自之教義學(xué)功能的獨立。
[Abstract]:The doctrinal function of the concept of principal offender is to solve the problem of conformance of the constituent elements of the criminal participant, the dogmatic function of the concept of principal offender lies in sentencing, the criminal legislation of our country about accomplice has the space of multiple interpretations. The interpretation conclusion of single system or differentiation system is not contrary to the current legislation, and the substantive tendency of the concept of principal crime in Germany and Japan, represented by the theory of important role and the theory of behavior domination, has resulted in the alienation of the doctrinal function of the concept of principal offender. It not only faces the problem of logical self-consistency within the system, but also exposes the malpractice of the differentiated legislative model represented by Germany and Japan. Under the position of limiting the concept of principal offender, it constructs the separation system of principal offender and principal offender by formalizing the interpretation of principal offender. It not only conforms to the existing legislation, but also ensures the independence of the dogmatic function of the principal offender and the principal offender.
【作者單位】： 海南大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D924.1

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 張偉;;德日共犯界限變遷軌跡及根基追問[J];前沿;2013年13期

2 劉瑞瑞;;德日不作為共犯研究評析[J];求索;2007年04期

3 歐陽本祺;;司法考試背景下本科刑法教學(xué)的改革[J];法制與社會;2009年27期

，

本文編號：1823565