本文選題：網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗行為 + 規(guī)范架構(gòu)　； 參考：《寧波大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗犯罪行為在司法實(shí)踐中遭遇罪與非罪的判斷與制度上選擇的的困境,本文針對(duì)遇到的困境提出解決的途徑并展開相關(guān)的研究,全文共分四個(gè)部分:文章第一部分以網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗行為之規(guī)范架構(gòu)為開篇,分兩個(gè)部分介紹,首先,網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗行為“非罪”之規(guī)范架構(gòu)。通過從行為的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、結(jié)果的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、實(shí)質(zhì)惡意的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)三個(gè)方面對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗行為“非罪”的規(guī)范結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行深入的分析。其次,網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗行為“罪”的規(guī)范架構(gòu)。通過從事實(shí)判準(zhǔn)、情節(jié)判準(zhǔn)兩個(gè)方面對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗行為“罪”的規(guī)范架構(gòu)進(jìn)行分析。文章第二部分對(duì)規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗行為實(shí)踐的三重困境進(jìn)行分析。第一,侵權(quán)行為,或者犯罪行為。第二,實(shí)質(zhì)惡意,或者主觀故意。第三,損害事實(shí),或者危害結(jié)果。文章第三部分是分析域外網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗行為規(guī)制的兩種徑路及其檢討。首先,域外網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗行為規(guī)制的兩種徑路。從網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗行為出罪化和入罪話兩個(gè)方面對(duì)域外的情況進(jìn)行分析。其次,域外網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗行為規(guī)制徑路之檢討。文章第四部分是對(duì)我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗行為實(shí)踐中的困境的突破方式進(jìn)行分析。首先,限制誹謗歸罪,運(yùn)用公眾人物原則、公共利益原則及誠(chéng)實(shí)意見原則對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)誹謗進(jìn)行歸罪。其次保障言論自由,從比例原則、個(gè)案利益衡量原則及實(shí)質(zhì)惡意原則來(lái)保證言論的自由。
[Abstract]:In the judicial practice of the crime of libel on the Internet, the judgment of crime and non-crime and the dilemma of system choice are encountered. This paper puts forward the ways to solve the difficulties encountered and carries out the relevant research. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part of the article begins with the normative framework of online libel, which is divided into two parts. First, the "non-criminal" normative framework of online libel. This paper makes a deep analysis of the "non-criminal" normative structure of Internet libel from three aspects, namely, the criterion of behavior, the criterion of result and the criterion of substantial malice. Secondly, the normative framework of the crime of internet libel. This paper analyzes the normative framework of the crime of internet libel from two aspects: factual judgment and plot judgment. The second part of the article analyzes the triple dilemma of regulating the practice of Internet libel. First, infringement, or criminal behavior. Second, substantial malice, or subjective intent. Third, damage the fact, or harm the result. The third part is to analyze the two ways and its review of the extraterritorial regulation of libel. First of all, there are two ways to regulate online libel. This paper analyzes the situation of internet libel from the two aspects of criminalization and incrimination. Secondly, the article reviews the regulation of internet libel. The fourth part is to analyze the breakthrough way of the predicament in the practice of internet libel in our country. First of all, we should limit slander and use public figure principle, public interest principle and honest opinion principle to impute online libel. Secondly, the freedom of speech is guaranteed by the principle of proportionality, the principle of case interest and the principle of malice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫立智;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪及其偵查對(duì)策[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

2 張治軍;陳鳳;;淺談?dòng)?jì)算機(jī)網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪及其防范[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

3 楊彩霞;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪之刑事立法與司法新探——以價(jià)值平衡為中心[J];河北法學(xué);2008年01期

4 陳謙信;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)違法行為的犯罪化[J];甘肅警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

5 張俊霞;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)共同犯罪若干疑難問題探討[J];河北法學(xué);2007年11期

6 張培祥;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪與技術(shù)防范對(duì)策[J];福建電腦;2007年10期

7 陳結(jié)淼;張?jiān)?;論我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪的立法完善[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2007年01期

8 陳勇;;刑法語(yǔ)境下的網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪[J];貴州民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

9 王志強(qiáng);;淺析計(jì)算機(jī)網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪及預(yù)防[J];信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全;2006年05期

10 張宏莉;翟健宏;胡銘曾;;信息內(nèi)容安全的主要技術(shù)及國(guó)內(nèi)外對(duì)比[J];計(jì)算機(jī)教育;2005年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1819843