本文選題：罪刑法定 + 刑法理念　； 參考：《福州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：罪刑法定原則是刑法中最重要的原則,是法治社會刑法區(qū)別于人治社會刑法的重要標(biāo)志�，F(xiàn)代刑法學(xué)者將罪刑法定原則經(jīng)典表述為“法無明文規(guī)定不為罪,法無明文規(guī)定不處罰”。1997年《刑法》第3條的規(guī)定使罪刑法定原則在我國得到確認(rèn),實(shí)現(xiàn)了罪刑法定主義的立法化。然而,相較于立法化,實(shí)現(xiàn)罪刑法定主義的司法化更為重要,因?yàn)槿绻镄谭ǘㄖ髁x不能在司法實(shí)踐中加以貫徹,罪刑法定主義的規(guī)定只不過是一句空話而已。因此,本文討論的正是實(shí)現(xiàn)罪刑法定原則在司法實(shí)踐中的貫徹執(zhí)行的問題,即罪刑法定司法化問題。本文將著重以刑事審判實(shí)踐為切入點(diǎn),結(jié)合罪刑法定原則在當(dāng)前司法實(shí)踐運(yùn)用中所面臨的問題,分析其原因所在,并提出解決這些問題的建設(shè)性對策。全文除引言外共三部分：第一部分主要是對罪刑法定原則的概述。從罪刑法定原則的理論入手,對罪刑法定原則的涵義和內(nèi)容要求,以及罪刑法定原則在我國刑法中的具體體現(xiàn)進(jìn)行了闡述。隨著刑事司法理論的不斷發(fā)展,相對罪刑法定主義(實(shí)質(zhì)側(cè)面)逐漸取代絕對罪刑法定主義(形式側(cè)面)成為各國刑法改革的主流。我國1997年《刑法》第3條的規(guī)定,標(biāo)志著在我國實(shí)現(xiàn)了罪刑法定原則的法典化。第二部分對我國當(dāng)前司法實(shí)踐的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行考察,指出司法判決違背罪刑法定原則,存在同案不同判、同案不同罰的現(xiàn)象。提出違背罪刑法定原則的原因,認(rèn)為主要原因在于立法缺陷、司法解釋不當(dāng)、司法制度不完善、社會輿論左右司法判決、法官素質(zhì)不高等方面。第三部分對罪刑法定原則的踐行提出基本思路。認(rèn)為,首先要轉(zhuǎn)變司法觀念,樹立現(xiàn)代刑事司法法治理念,當(dāng)不使用刑罰,而用其他手段也能達(dá)到實(shí)現(xiàn)保護(hù)社會和個(gè)人法益的目的時(shí),應(yīng)當(dāng)放棄使用刑罰的手段。其次要在罪刑法定原則指導(dǎo)下完善立法機(jī)制,提高立法技術(shù),規(guī)范刑事司法解釋,提高立法和司法解釋的質(zhì)與量。最后要改善司法運(yùn)行環(huán)境,推動省級以下司法機(jī)關(guān)人財(cái)物的統(tǒng)一領(lǐng)導(dǎo),積極探索與行政劃區(qū)適當(dāng)分離的司法管轄制度,實(shí)現(xiàn)司法獨(dú)立；提高刑事司法工作人員的素質(zhì),營造和諧的媒體監(jiān)督環(huán)境。
[Abstract]:The principle of legality is the most important principle in criminal law, and it is an important symbol of the difference between criminal law of rule of law and that of society ruled by man. Modern criminal jurists express the principle of legality as "the law does not explicitly stipulate that it is not a crime, and the law does not explicitly stipulate that it does not penalize." Article 3 of the 1997 Criminal Law confirms the principle of legally prescribed punishment in China. The legalization of legality is realized. However, it is more important to realize the judicalization of legality than legislation, because if the doctrine of legality can not be carried out in judicial practice, the stipulation of legality is just empty talk. Therefore, this paper discusses the implementation of the principle of legality in judicial practice, that is, the judicial issue of legality. This article will focus on the criminal trial practice as a starting point, combined with the principle of legality in the application of the current judicial practice faced problems, analysis of its causes, and put forward constructive solutions to these problems. There are three parts in this paper: the first part is an overview of the principle of legality. Starting with the theory of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime, this paper expounds the meaning and content of the principle of legality of a crime, and the concrete embodiment of the principle of legality of a crime in the criminal law of our country. With the development of criminal justice theory, relative legality doctrine (substantive side) has gradually replaced absolute legality doctrine (formal side) into the mainstream of criminal law reform in various countries. The provisions of Article 3 of the 1997 Criminal Law symbolize the codification of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime in China. The second part investigates the current situation of judicial practice in our country, and points out that judicial judgment violates the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime, and there are different judgments in the same case and different punishment in the same case. The author points out that the main reasons for violating the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime lie in the defects of legislation, improper judicial interpretation, imperfect judicial system, the influence of public opinion on judicial decisions, and the poor quality of judges. The third part puts forward the basic idea to practice the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime. It is believed that the first step is to change the concept of judicature and establish the concept of modern criminal judicature rule of law. When penalty is not used and other means can achieve the purpose of protecting social and individual legal interests, the means of using punishment should be abandoned. Secondly, we should perfect the legislative mechanism, improve the legislative technology, standardize the criminal judicial interpretation, and improve the quality and quantity of the legislative and judicial interpretation under the guidance of the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime. Finally, it is necessary to improve the judicial operating environment, promote the unified leadership of the people and property of the judicial organs below the provincial level, actively explore the judicial jurisdiction system that is properly separated from the administrative district, realize the judicial independence, improve the quality of the criminal judicial personnel, Create a harmonious media supervision environment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 劉憲權(quán);;罪刑法定原則在我國的發(fā)展及應(yīng)有之義[J];法學(xué);2010年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孟紅;罪刑法定原則與近代中國刑法之變遷[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2007年

，

本文編號：1817973