本文選題：配偶 + 作為義務(wù)�。� 參考：《政治與法律》2017年05期

【摘要】：在重要的法益遭受危險(xiǎn)時(shí),只有根據(jù)法律的規(guī)定和共同生活所形成的信賴關(guān)系,配偶之間才產(chǎn)生互相保護(hù)和救助的特別作為義務(wù);配偶刑法上的作為義務(wù)并不是無限制的,生活的通常情形和配偶的自我決定都應(yīng)該成為排除配偶另一方作為義務(wù)的正當(dāng)事由。我國的司法實(shí)務(wù)在解決配偶的作為義務(wù)這一問題上,大多過于形式地得出結(jié)論,認(rèn)為只要存在配偶關(guān)系,就負(fù)有作為義務(wù);也有少數(shù)刑事判決實(shí)質(zhì)性地考慮到必須限制配偶作為義務(wù)的范圍,對這種實(shí)務(wù)做法更需要刑法學(xué)界予以充分關(guān)注并給予理論支持。
[Abstract]:In cases where important legal interests are endangered, it is only in accordance with the provisions of the law and the relationship of trust formed by common life that the spouses have a special duty to protect and assist each other; the obligation to act in the criminal law of the spouse is not unlimited. The usual circumstances of life and the self-determination of the spouse should be a legitimate reason to exclude the other spouse from the obligation. In the judicial practice of our country, in solving the problem of spouse's act obligation, most of them come to the conclusion that as long as there is spousal relationship, it has the duty to act; There are also a few criminal judgments considering the necessity of limiting the scope of spouses' duties, and this practical practice requires the full attention and theoretical support of the criminal law community.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)刑事法律科學(xué)研究中心;
【基金】：2012年教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)重點(diǎn)研究基地項(xiàng)目(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):12JJD820002)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D923.9;D924.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 聞志強(qiáng);;夫妻扶養(yǎng)義務(wù)在不作為犯罪義務(wù)來源中的性質(zhì)界定[J];中國檢察官;2013年16期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1817312