醉酒型危險駕駛罪研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-04-24 22:21
本文選題:危險駕駛罪 + 醉酒駕駛 ; 參考:《西北大學》2014年碩士論文
【摘要】:2000年以后,我國的汽車數(shù)量不斷增加,交通事故的數(shù)量也隨之不斷攀升,其中由于醉酒駕駛引發(fā)的交通事故占有很大的比重。隨著因醉酒引發(fā)交通事故的案件頻繁出現(xiàn)在電視、報紙等媒體,公眾越來越關(guān)注醉駕問題。2011年,全國人大常委會通過了《刑法修正案(八)》,將醉酒駕駛行為納入刑法規(guī)制的范圍,醉酒駕駛行為將以危險駕駛罪來定罪處罰。但是,醉駕型危險駕駛罪作為刑法中一個新的犯罪類型,醉酒駕駛型危險駕駛罪在理論和實踐上存在許多爭議。 本文共分為六章:第一章主要介紹了選題背景及意義,國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀以及本文所采用的研究方法。第二章筆者主要從醉酒型危險駕駛罪的立法背景和立法意義上肯定了“酒駕”入刑的積極意義。第三章筆者對我國的醉酒型危險駕駛罪從傳統(tǒng)四要件說剖析了該罪的主體、客體、主觀方面和客觀方面,通過對不同觀點的介紹分析,進一步明確了該罪的主體、客體、主觀方面、客觀方面。第四章筆者提出了危險駕駛罪的幾個立法缺陷,首先,關(guān)于“醉駕”入罪的標準模糊不清;其次,關(guān)于醉酒型危險駕駛罪的法定刑設置也存在不合理之處;最后,醉酒型危險駕駛罪定罪標準不明確,與其他類似的罪名界限模糊。第五章主要介紹了國外和我國港澳臺地區(qū)對“酒駕”的立法現(xiàn)狀,利用比較分析的方法指出我國在危險駕駛罪的設定上存在的不足之處。第六章筆者針對上文提出的立法缺陷對醉酒駕駛是否一律定罪處罰的問題進行了分析,對危險駕駛罪和交通肇事罪和以危險方法危害公共安全罪之間的關(guān)系進行了梳理。同時在法定刑設置上,筆者給出了自己的建議:將法定刑提高,增加軟處罰和新的資格刑。
[Abstract]:Since 2000, the number of cars in our country has been increasing, and the number of traffic accidents has been rising, among which the traffic accidents caused by drunken driving account for a large proportion. With cases of drunken traffic accidents appearing frequently on television, newspapers and other media, the public is increasingly concerned about drunk driving. The standing Committee of the National people's Congress (NPC) has adopted the Criminal Law Amendment (8), which brings drunken driving behavior into the scope of the criminal law, and the drunken driving behavior will be convicted and punished with the crime of dangerous driving. However, as a new type of crime in criminal law, the crime of drunk driving dangerous driving is controversial in theory and practice. This paper is divided into six chapters: the first chapter mainly introduces the background and significance of the topic, domestic and foreign research status and research methods adopted in this paper. In the second chapter, the author affirms the positive significance of "drunk driving" from the legislative background and legislative significance of the crime of drunken dangerous driving. In the third chapter, the author analyzes the subject, object, subjective aspect and objective aspect of the crime from the view of traditional four elements, and through the introduction and analysis of different viewpoints, it further clarifies the subject and object of the crime. Subjective aspect, objective aspect. In the fourth chapter, the author puts forward several legislative defects of the crime of dangerous driving. Firstly, the standard of "drunk driving" is vague; secondly, the legal penalty of the crime of drunken dangerous driving is also unreasonable; finally, The standard of conviction for drunken dangerous driving is unclear and blurred with other similar offences. The fifth chapter mainly introduces the legislation status of "drinking driving" in foreign countries and in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, and points out the shortcomings of the crime of dangerous driving in our country by means of comparative analysis. In the sixth chapter, the author analyzes the problem of whether drunk driving is all convicted and penalized, and combs the relationship between dangerous driving crime and traffic accident crime and the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous methods. At the same time, in the legal penalty setting, the author gives his own suggestions: to raise the legal penalty, to increase the soft punishment and new qualification penalty.
【學位授予單位】:西北大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D924.3
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 樊建民;;醉駕入刑若干問題探究[J];公民與法(法學版);2011年09期
2 孟君;;危險駕駛行為的刑法規(guī)制[J];湖北警官學院學報;2010年02期
3 張凌云;;醉駕入刑的熱點問題分析[J];三峽大學學報(人文社會科學版);2011年S2期
4 周立剛;楊云;;從“醉駕”是否應一律入刑看對刑法理性的堅守[J];學理論;2011年19期
5 孫國祥;黃星;;醉酒駕車之刑事法規(guī)制進路分析[J];法學論壇;2009年06期
6 李永升;李濤;;生命的守護還是疏離——評醉駕入刑的情節(jié)[J];西南政法大學學報;2011年05期
7 羅開卷;;醉酒駕車犯罪的定罪與量刑——以成都孫偉銘案為切入點[J];法治論叢;2010年02期
8 趙秉志;趙遠;;危險駕駛罪研析與思考[J];政治與法律;2011年08期
9 勞東燕;;公共政策與風險社會的刑法[J];中國社會科學;2007年03期
10 張紅艷;;風險社會中公害犯罪之刑法規(guī)制——以抽象危險犯理論為切入點[J];中州學刊;2009年05期
,本文編號:1798515
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1798515.html