本文選題：走私、販賣、運輸、制造毒品罪 + 既遂　； 參考：《廣東財經(jīng)大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：走私、販賣、運輸、制造毒品罪是行為犯,存在既遂形態(tài)和未遂形態(tài)。在現(xiàn)有法律及司法解釋對其既未遂規(guī)定空白的情況下,基于“重刑治毒”刑事政策的影響對本罪的處理通常一律按既遂論處,而忽略未遂形態(tài)存在的情況,影響正確的定性和與合理的量刑。因此需對本罪的既遂標準作進一步的分析,從而解決司法實踐中有關本罪既遂形態(tài)與未遂形態(tài)的認定問題。走私、販賣、運輸、制造毒品罪是選擇性罪名,理應在一個統(tǒng)一的既遂標準前提下分別討論各個行為的既遂形態(tài),以解決未遂的認定問題。而這個統(tǒng)一的標準應當建立在構成要件齊備的基礎上,考慮本罪所產(chǎn)生的抽象危險。本文將從走私、販賣、運輸、制造毒品罪既遂的基本標準出發(fā),分析本罪的相關構成要件要素,探討本罪法益侵害的危險類型,再結合擬定的標準分別對走私、販賣、運輸、制造毒品四種行為的既遂形態(tài)進行認定,以此反推本罪存在未遂的情形,以明確區(qū)分界限。此外,本文也將深入研究本罪在控制下交付和不能犯情形下的未遂認定及處理,解決在特殊情況下區(qū)分本罪既未遂的難題。
[Abstract]:The crime of smuggling, trafficking, transporting and manufacturing drugs is a crime of behavior.Under the condition that the existing law and judicial explanation stipulate the blank of the attempted crime, the treatment of this crime based on the criminal policy of "severe punishment and drug control" is usually dealt with according to the accomplished situation, while neglecting the existence of the attempted form.Influence the correct qualitative and reasonable sentencing.Therefore, it is necessary to make a further analysis of the accomplished standard of this crime, so as to solve the problem of cognizance of the accomplished form and attempted form of the crime in judicial practice.The crime of smuggling, trafficking, transporting and manufacturing drugs is a selective crime and should be discussed separately on the premise of a unified accomplished standard in order to solve the problem of identification of attempt.This unified standard should be based on the complete elements and consider the abstract danger of the crime.This article will proceed from the basic standards of the crime of smuggling, trafficking, transportation and manufacture of drugs, analyze the elements of the relevant constitutive elements of this crime, discuss the dangerous types of infringement of legal interests of this crime, and then combine the proposed standards to deal with smuggling, trafficking, and transportation respectively.In order to distinguish the boundary clearly, the accomplished form of four behaviors of making drugs is determined, and the situation of attempted existence of this crime is deduced.In addition, this paper will also deeply study the attempted identification and treatment of the crime under the circumstances of controlled delivery and impossibility, and solve the problem of distinguishing the attempted crime from the attempted crime under the special circumstances.
【學位授予單位】：廣東財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王志祥;黃云波;;論立法定量模式下抽象危險犯處罰之司法正當性[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2016年03期

2 胡海;;對販賣毒品罪既遂標準之從嚴刑事政策的審視與重構[J];學術界;2016年02期

3 何榮功;;我國“重刑治毒”刑事政策之法社會學思考[J];法商研究;2015年05期

4 劉鴻儒;;運輸毒品犯罪疑難問題研究[J];中國人民公安大學學報(社會科學版);2015年03期

5 劉梅湘;仲慧;;論控制下交付的法律性質[J];中國人民公安大學學報(社會科學版);2014年03期

6 陳京春;;抽象危險犯的概念詮釋與風險防控[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2014年03期

7 鄧立軍;;新刑事訴訟法視野下的控制下交付研究[J];中國人民公安大學學報(社會科學版);2014年01期

8 李永升;;走私毒品罪若干問題研究[J];昆明理工大學學報(社會科學版);2013年03期

9 李永升;張超;;對犯罪既遂標準的反思與重構[J];昆明理工大學學報(社會科學版);2012年01期

10 周光權;;區(qū)分不能犯和未遂犯的三個維度[J];清華法學;2011年04期

，

本文編號：1773807