本文選題：混合主體 + 共同貪污　； 參考：《華僑大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)刑法對(duì)貪污罪的立法比較完善，從1951的《中華人民共和國(guó)懲治貪污條例》到1979年刑法，直到1997年刑法，有關(guān)貪污罪的立法規(guī)定的比較詳盡。有關(guān)貪污罪法律適用的司法解釋更是豐富�？傮w上構(gòu)筑了懲治貪污犯罪的嚴(yán)密法網(wǎng)。但是，不能不關(guān)注的問(wèn)題是混合主體共同貪污的定性問(wèn)題是我國(guó)貪污罪立法與司法上的一個(gè)難題，尤其是刑法第382條第3款規(guī)定的“與前兩款所列人員勾結(jié)，伙同貪污的，以共犯論處”規(guī)范具有模糊性。最高法院《關(guān)于審理貪污、職務(wù)侵占案件如何認(rèn)定共同犯罪幾個(gè)問(wèn)題的解釋》第3條的規(guī)定：“公司、企業(yè)或者其他單位中，不具有國(guó)家工作人員身份的人與國(guó)家工作人員勾結(jié)，分別利用各自的職務(wù)便利，共同將本單位財(cái)物非法占為己有的，按照主犯的犯罪性質(zhì)定罪�！备鞘沟没旌现黧w共同貪污行為定性難點(diǎn)更顯突出。例如，其使得身份與共犯的關(guān)系更為復(fù)雜。 本文通過(guò)對(duì)貪污罪侵害的法益的考察，尤其是通過(guò)借鑒境外貪污罪立法與司法實(shí)踐的分析與比較，認(rèn)為應(yīng)以法益分類(lèi)為基礎(chǔ)，作為共同貪污行為定性的主要依據(jù)，適當(dāng)擴(kuò)張貪污罪正犯的主體范圍，較好地解決現(xiàn)行立法與司法實(shí)踐上的混合主體共同貪污定性困境的難題。文章以混合主體共同貪污的定性為視角，比較全面解析了刑法有關(guān)共同貪污的主體規(guī)定，也指出了解決現(xiàn)行貪污罪問(wèn)題的一些對(duì)策與建議。 論文第一章為我國(guó)貪污罪共同犯罪的規(guī)定及其特點(diǎn)。論文詳細(xì)地介紹了貪污罪共同犯罪的有關(guān)規(guī)定和貪污罪的共犯類(lèi)型，分析了貪污罪共犯的特點(diǎn)，指出貪污罪的特殊性表現(xiàn)為犯罪主體混雜、身份與共犯的關(guān)系更為復(fù)雜以及“伙同貪污，以共犯論”的規(guī)范含義有待厘清。論文著重指出了混合主體共同貪污犯罪類(lèi)型的復(fù)雜性。 論文第二章為混合主體共同貪污定性的觀點(diǎn)評(píng)析。本章介紹了國(guó)內(nèi)關(guān)于混合主體共同貪污犯罪定性問(wèn)題的幾種觀點(diǎn)，并且深入分析這些觀點(diǎn)之中的合理之處以及存在的問(wèn)題，指出有關(guān)的理論觀點(diǎn)并沒(méi)有為混合主體共同貪污的定性提供較為合理的解釋原理。 論文第三章為域外共同貪污犯罪的立法例和理論觀點(diǎn)考察。論文介紹了德國(guó)、日本和臺(tái)灣地區(qū)關(guān)于處理混合主體共同貪污犯罪的法律根據(jù)和理論學(xué)說(shuō)，并對(duì)其加以分析評(píng)價(jià)，在此基礎(chǔ)上，，總結(jié)了域外共同貪污犯罪的定性特點(diǎn)，即以法益分類(lèi)為基礎(chǔ)確定共同犯罪性質(zhì)和貪污罪主體范圍具有擴(kuò)張趨勢(shì)，這些特點(diǎn)和趨勢(shì)無(wú)疑值得我國(guó)借鑒。 論文第四章為我國(guó)共同貪污犯罪定性的反思與建議。論文梳理了對(duì)于我國(guó)混合主體共同貪污犯罪定性的思路，反思貪污罪共犯處理難題，提出共同貪污定性應(yīng)以公共財(cái)產(chǎn)作為貪污罪的侵害客體，以正犯作為共同貪污的主犯，適當(dāng)擴(kuò)張貪污罪的主體范圍。 通過(guò)比較與分析，本文初步梳理了混合主體共同貪污犯罪立法的相關(guān)規(guī)定，從理論層面探索，解決貪污罪共同犯罪處理難題的方案。但作者的觀點(diǎn)還有待于理論與實(shí)踐的進(jìn)一步檢視。
[Abstract]:China's criminal law on the crime of corruption legislation is perfect, "People's Republic of China from 1951 to 1979 of the regulations on the punishment of corruption and criminal law, criminal law until 1997, relevant provisions of the crime of corruption legislation in detail. Judicial interpretation of the law applicable to the crime of corruption is more abundant. In general it has constructed the stringent law to punish the crime of corruption. However, not concern is the qualitative problems mixed subject joint corruption is a problem of our country's legislation and judicial corruption, especially the provisions of the third paragraph of article 382nd of the criminal law" and the person mentioned in the preceding two paragraphs together with collusion, corruption, to the accomplice "standard is fuzzy. The Supreme Court of the trial of corruption, embezzlement cases how to identify several common crime explanations of the third stipulation:" companies, enterprises or other units in the country, and it is not work the status of national staff Staff collusion, respectively use their positions to facilitate, to the unit of property illegally for himself, according to the nature of the crime of conviction. "Is the principal mixed subject joint corruption qualitative difficulties more prominent. For example, the relationship between identity and accomplice is more complex.
In this paper, through the investigation of violation of the law benefit of the crime of corruption, especially through the analysis and comparison of foreign legislation and judicial practice of the crime of corruption, that should be the basis for the classification of legal interest, as the main basis of qualitative joint corruption, embezzlement crime the appropriate expansion of the scope of subject, to solve the problem of the current legislative and judicial mixed subject the practice of the joint corruption dilemma. Based on the qualitative qualitative mixed subject joint corruption from the perspective of the comprehensive analysis of the relevant provisions of the criminal law common corruption, also points out some countermeasures and suggestions to solve the current problem of corruption crime.
In the first chapter, provisions for the crime of corruption crime and its characteristics. This paper introduces the relevant provisions of the crime of corruption crime and corruption crime types, analyzes the characteristics of embezzlement crime, the crime of corruption that special performance for the subject of crime and accomplice in a mixed relationship is more complicated and "together with corruption, normative meaning to accomplice theory" to be clarified. This paper pointed out that the complexity of mixed subject joint corruption crime types.
The second chapter is the analysis of the mixed subject joint corruption qualitative view. This chapter introduces several opinions about mixed subject joint corruption crime qualitative issues of domestic, and in-depth analysis of shortcomings of these ideas and the existing problems, points out the related theory viewpoint and no qualitative explanation for the mixed subject joint corruption principle reasonable offer.
The third chapter is the foreign joint corruption crime legislation and theoretical perspective. This paper introduces Germany, Japan and Taiwan regions on the treatment of mixed subject joint corruption crime according to law and theory, and the analysis and evaluation, on this basis, summarizes the qualitative characteristics of foreign joint corruption crime, namely legal interest classification to determine the nature of joint crime and corruption crime has the trend of expansion, the characteristics and the trend is worthy of our reference.
The fourth chapter is the reflection and suggestion of our joint corruption crime. This paper reviews the qualitative for the mixed subject of China's joint corruption crime qualitative thinking, reflection of accomplice of corruption crime problem, put forward the common qualitative corruption should be the public property as the crime of corruption against the object, the principal as principal joint corruption, the appropriate expansion of the crime of corruption the scope of the subject.
Through comparison and analysis, this paper preliminarily combed the relevant provisions of the legislation of the joint corruption crime of the mixed main body, and explored the solution to solve the problem of the joint crime of corruption crime from the theoretical level. But the author's viewpoint still needs further inspection of theory and practice.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.392

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 何承斌;共同犯罪與身份問(wèn)題的比較研究——以貪污犯為線索評(píng)析我國(guó)共同犯罪與身份問(wèn)題立法[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

2 林亞剛;;身份與共同犯罪關(guān)系散論[J];法學(xué)家;2003年03期

3 遲永恒;龐虎;;無(wú)身份者能否成為身份犯之共同正犯再探討[J];吉林公安高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

4 何慶仁;;德國(guó)刑法學(xué)中的義務(wù)犯理論[J];刑事法評(píng)論;2009年01期

5 趙秉志;共犯與身份問(wèn)題研究——以職務(wù)犯罪為視角[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2004年01期

本文編號(hào)：1768106