本文選題：公民個人信息 + 違反國家有關(guān)規(guī)定　； 參考：《上海師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：公民個人信息在社會不斷發(fā)展中,凸顯出了巨大的經(jīng)濟價值。隨著科技的進步,收集、獲取公民個人信息變的越來越容易,公民個人信息遭受嚴重侵害的事件時有發(fā)生,公民個人信息的刑法保護具有重要價值。2015年11月生效的《刑法修正案(九)》對侵犯公民個人信息罪做出了重大修改,這次修改具有重大意義,它加大了公民個人信息的刑法保護力度,但是,其在適用中仍然存在:以其他方法非法竊取個人信息行為的界定、“情節(jié)嚴重”認定、跨法犯的處理等問題。本文以《刑法修正案(九)》侵犯公民個人信息罪的重大修改為背景,提出本罪的司法疑難問題,并分析這些疑難問題的解決方案,以期能夠更好的實現(xiàn)公民個人信息的刑法保護效果。本文除序言外,共有六個部分。第一部分,個人信息法律保護概論。首先,描述了公民個人信息受到侵害的嚴重現(xiàn)象;其次,分析了我國憲法、行政法、民法對公民個人信息的保護及不足;然后,分析了刑法保護公民個人信息的必要性,在分析刑法保護個人信息必要性的基礎(chǔ)上,提出刑法保護公民個人信息的適度性;最后,對《刑法修正案(九)》實施后侵犯公民個人信息罪刑法保護規(guī)定進行了分析,接著分析了本罪《刑法修正案(九)》修正的進步之處。第二部分,個人信息的內(nèi)涵界定問題。首先,提出了公民個人信息內(nèi)涵理解兩方面的問題:一是“公民”的界定問題,二是“個人信息“的界定問題;其次,通過比較分析,歸納出公民個人信息的內(nèi)涵;然后,分析了公民個人信息的法律屬性,對與公民個人信息相關(guān)概念進行厘清;最后,分析了公民個人信息的刑法認定路徑和方法。第三部分,“違反國家有關(guān)規(guī)定”的理解問題。首先,是對“違反國家有關(guān)規(guī)定”理解爭議的提出,其次,對“違反國家有關(guān)規(guī)定”爭議觀點進行分析;然后,分析“違反國家有關(guān)規(guī)定”的應(yīng)有內(nèi)涵,并分析了本罪的違法性認識問題。第四部分,對本罪行為方式認定問題。首先,分別分析了對出售、提供、竊取、以其他方法非法獲取公民個人信息的行為;其次,分析了本罪的行為競合問題;最后,分析了本罪既未遂及共犯問題。第五部分,對本罪“情節(jié)嚴重”認定標準的分析。首先,提出本罪“情節(jié)嚴重”認定標準的理解爭議;其次,分析本罪“情節(jié)嚴重”認定的觀點;最后,是對本罪“情節(jié)嚴重”標準具體設(shè)置的分析,通過案例分析能夠更加直觀的分析本罪的司法適用,本部分也結(jié)合典型案例,分析“情節(jié)嚴重”的認定。第六部分,跨法犯處理問題。首先,是本罪跨法犯問題的提出;其次,對本罪的跨法犯處理問題進行了分類分析;最后,是本罪跨法犯問題的解決,作者贊同以行為時法律以及一般人對當時情形的理解來對跨法犯進行認定。
[Abstract]:Personal information of citizens in the continuous development of society, highlighted the enormous economic value.With the progress of science and technology, it is becoming easier and easier to collect and obtain personal information of citizens, and incidents of serious violations of personal information of citizens occur from time to time.The criminal law protection of citizens' personal information is of great value. The Criminal Law Amendment (9), which came into effect in November 2015, has made major changes to the crime of infringing on citizens' personal information, and this revision is of great significance.It strengthens the criminal law protection of citizens' personal information, but it still exists in its application: the definition of illegal theft of personal information by other methods, the determination of "serious circumstances", and the handling of crimes committed across laws and so on.Based on the major revision of the crime of infringing on citizens' personal information, this paper puts forward the judicial difficult problems of this crime, and analyzes the solutions to these difficult problems.In order to achieve better personal information of citizens of the criminal law protection effect.Besides the preface, there are six parts in this paper.The first part is an introduction to the legal protection of personal information.Firstly, it describes the serious phenomenon of citizen's personal information being violated; secondly, it analyzes the protection and insufficiency of citizen's personal information in our constitution, administrative law and civil law; then, it analyzes the necessity of criminal law to protect citizen's personal information.On the basis of analyzing the necessity of criminal law to protect personal information, this paper puts forward the appropriateness of criminal law to protect citizen's personal information, and finally, analyzes the criminal law protection provisions for infringing on citizen's personal information after the implementation of "Criminal Law Amendment (9)".Then it analyzes the progress of the amendment of criminal law (9).The second part is about the definition of personal information.First of all, it puts forward two problems of understanding the connotation of citizen's personal information: one is the definition of "citizen", the other is the definition of "personal information"; secondly, the connotation of citizen's personal information is summed up through comparative analysis; then,This paper analyzes the legal attributes of citizen's personal information and clarifies the concepts related to citizen's personal information. Finally, it analyzes the path and method of criminal law recognition of citizen's personal information.The third part is about the understanding of the violation of the relevant regulations of the state.First, to put forward the dispute of "violating the relevant regulations of the State"; secondly, to analyze the controversial point of view of "violating the relevant provisions of the State"; and then, to analyze the proper connotation of "violating the relevant provisions of the State."And analyzes the illegal understanding of this crime.The fourth part, to this crime behavior way cognizance question.First of all, it analyzes the behavior of illegal acquisition of personal information of citizens by selling, providing, stealing and obtaining personal information by other methods; secondly, it analyzes the behavior concurrence of this crime; finally, it analyzes the problem of attempted and accomplice of this crime.The fifth part, the analysis of the crime "serious circumstances" standard.First of all, it puts forward the understanding and controversy of the criterion of "serious circumstances" of this crime; secondly, it analyzes the viewpoint of "serious circumstances" of this crime; finally, it analyzes the concrete setting of the standard of "serious circumstances" of this crime.Through the case analysis can more intuitively analyze the judicial application of this crime, this part also combines the typical cases, analyzes the "serious circumstances".The sixth part deals with the problem of cross-law offense.First of all, the problem of cross-legal crime is raised; secondly, the problem of cross-legal crime is classified and analyzed; finally, the problem of cross-legal crime is solved.The author agrees with the law of the time of the act and the understanding of the situation at that time.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.34

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高富平;王文祥;;出售或提供公民個人信息入罪的邊界——以侵犯公民個人信息罪所保護的法益為視角[J];政治與法律;2017年02期

2 勞東燕;;能動司法與功能主義的刑法解釋論[J];法學(xué)家;2016年06期

3 劉越;;論生物識別信息的財產(chǎn)權(quán)保護[J];法商研究;2016年06期

4 鞠曄;凌學(xué)東;;大數(shù)據(jù)背景下網(wǎng)絡(luò)消費者個人信息侵權(quán)問題及法律救濟[J];河北法學(xué);2016年11期

5 吳亞安;;論我國刑法中數(shù)額的性質(zhì)[J];政治與法律;2016年09期

6 于志剛;李源粒;;大數(shù)據(jù)時代數(shù)據(jù)犯罪的類型化與制裁思路[J];政治與法律;2016年09期

7 喻海松;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪的立法擴張與司法適用[J];法律適用;2016年09期

8 李玉萍;;侵犯公民個人信息罪的實踐與思考[J];法律適用;2016年09期

9 楊惟欽;;價值維度中的個人信息權(quán)屬模式考察——以利益屬性分析切入[J];法學(xué)評論;2016年04期

10 陳洪兵;;刑法溯及力適用問題研究——兼與民法、行政法比較[J];法治研究;2016年04期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前5條

1 陳靜;;給個人信息加上防護鎖[N];經(jīng)濟日報;2016年

2 徐瀟;;個人信息“裸奔” 如何擊碎黑色產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈？[N];工人日報;2016年

3 張新寶;;隱私權(quán)與個人信息保護[N];法制日報;2016年

4 姜峗;;個人信息安全，不能止于“打補丁”[N];人民日報;2016年

5 陳麗平;;立法保護個人信息治理電信詐騙[N];法制日報;2016年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 劉暢;大數(shù)據(jù)時代個人信息保護問題研究[D];東北財經(jīng)大學(xué);2016年

2 張帆;我國公民個人信息保護制度法理研究[D];山西大學(xué);2015年

3 劉倩倩;個人信息刑法保護案例研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1763010