本文選題：獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯 + 預(yù)備行為實(shí)行化��； 參考：《安徽大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著《刑法修正案(九)》的頒布,獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯開始受到我國(guó)學(xué)者關(guān)注。在此之前,我國(guó)將預(yù)備犯規(guī)定在刑法第22條:"為了犯罪,準(zhǔn)備工具、制造條件的,是犯罪預(yù)備。對(duì)于預(yù)備犯,可以比照既遂犯從輕、減輕處罰或者免除處罰。"而《刑法修正案(九)》新增了準(zhǔn)備實(shí)施恐怖活動(dòng)罪,通過(guò)分則的規(guī)定將原本恐怖活動(dòng)的預(yù)備行為轉(zhuǎn)化為準(zhǔn)備實(shí)施恐怖活動(dòng)罪的實(shí)行行為,獨(dú)立成罪,從形式上打破了我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)預(yù)備犯的規(guī)定,這類罪名被學(xué)者稱為獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯。也正因?yàn)槿绱?我國(guó)刑法理論界在此之前對(duì)獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯并沒有做深入的研究,對(duì)獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯的概念、設(shè)立依據(jù)以及一些理論認(rèn)定都沒有形成系統(tǒng)的理論成果。因此,需要從這幾個(gè)方面對(duì)獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯進(jìn)行理論研究,為立法與司法實(shí)踐提供支撐與指導(dǎo)。在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的背景下,世界上絕大多數(shù)大陸法系國(guó)家也早已在其刑法中設(shè)立獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯以保護(hù)重大法益。我國(guó)同樣也已經(jīng)進(jìn)入風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì),在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)中人們對(duì)于風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的恐懼也讓人們對(duì)于安全的追求更為強(qiáng)烈,并開始希望法律能在這種風(fēng)險(xiǎn)產(chǎn)生結(jié)果之前就讓其得到有效的控制。獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯,不僅表現(xiàn)出刑法對(duì)侵害重要法益的犯罪的提前介入,也體現(xiàn)出國(guó)家對(duì)于重大法益的嚴(yán)密保護(hù),能夠有效地對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)進(jìn)行防控,這也是獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯在我國(guó)刑法分則中設(shè)立的重要依據(jù)之一。此外,我國(guó)刑法總則中預(yù)備犯普遍處罰原則與司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)預(yù)備犯較少處罰的沖突體現(xiàn)出了司法機(jī)關(guān)的理性選擇。相較備受爭(zhēng)議的普遍處罰原則而言,司法機(jī)關(guān)的理性選擇無(wú)疑更符合當(dāng)代的刑法理論與刑法原則,而這種理性也應(yīng)該反映在立法上,即規(guī)定相應(yīng)的獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯。除此之外,獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯研究的重點(diǎn)還在于獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯的認(rèn)定,包括獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯的實(shí)行行為、停止形態(tài)以及共犯形態(tài)的認(rèn)定。預(yù)備行為與實(shí)行行為是截然不同的兩個(gè)概念,在一般情況下兩者有著明確的區(qū)分。但是在刑法分則規(guī)定了獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯之后,被規(guī)定的預(yù)備行為向?qū)嵭行袨檫M(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)化的情況卻客觀的存在。本文通過(guò)對(duì)預(yù)備行為與實(shí)行行為進(jìn)行一定的分析,以闡明獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯中原本預(yù)備行為向?qū)嵭行袨檫M(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)化的原因與過(guò)程,并且對(duì)沒有類型化的行為進(jìn)行實(shí)質(zhì)上的認(rèn)定。在獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯的停止形態(tài)中,本文主要對(duì)獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯的既遂、未遂、預(yù)備與中止進(jìn)行探討。在我國(guó)刑法理論中,"著手"是既遂、未遂形成的核心條件,因此需要通過(guò)比較"著手"的不同學(xué)說(shuō),對(duì)獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯的"著手'"進(jìn)行判定,以認(rèn)定其既遂與未遂。而對(duì)于犯罪預(yù)備與犯罪中止而言,不同國(guó)家也有著不同的規(guī)定,因此需要從我國(guó)現(xiàn)行立法與傳統(tǒng)理論出發(fā),闡明獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯的預(yù)備與中止能否成立以及是否應(yīng)該受到處罰。在獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯的共犯形態(tài)中,本文首先在共犯從屬性說(shuō)以及行為共同說(shuō)的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯共同正犯的成立與否進(jìn)行探討。同時(shí),獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯的幫助行為與實(shí)行行為在實(shí)踐中難以區(qū)別,本文從傳統(tǒng)的理論入手,明確獨(dú)立預(yù)備犯中幫助犯與共同正犯的界限,對(duì)幫助犯與共同正犯進(jìn)行區(qū)分。在共犯中,除了共同正犯、幫助犯外,還需要通過(guò)傳統(tǒng)理論證明其教唆犯的成立,并且對(duì)于兩種教唆內(nèi)容與實(shí)行行為不一致的情況進(jìn)行探究。
[Abstract]:With the "criminal law amendment (nine)" the promulgation of independent preparatory crime and pay attention to the Chinese scholars. Prior to this, China will be the preparatory crime stipulated in the criminal law twenty-second: "for a crime preparation tool, the creation of the conditions for a crime. The crime in preparation, can be treated either commit a lighter, mitigated punishment or exempted from punishment." "criminal law amendment (nine)" new preparations for the implementation of terrorist crimes, through specific provisions the original terrorist activities into preparing for the implementation of preparatory acts of terrorism crime, a separate crime, from the form of breaking the provisions of China's traditional preparatory crime, this kind of crime is scholars called independent preparatory crime. Because of this, before China's criminal law theory of independent preparatory crime did not do in-depth research, the concept of independent preparatory crime, the establishment of the basis and some theories that have not formed the theoretical system into Fruit. Therefore, the need for independent preparatory crime theory research from these aspects, provide support and guidance for legislation and judicial practice. In the context of risk society, the vast majority of the world countries of continental law system has been set up in the independent preparatory in criminal law to protect the legal interests of major crime. China has also entered the risk in the society, risk society people fear for the risk also let the people for the pursuit of security is more intense, and began to hope that the law can result in before this risk is to be effectively controlled. The independent preparatory crime, not only the criminal law against the important interests of the crime of the early intervention, but also reflects the the state for strict protection granted legal interests, can effectively carry out prevention and control of risk, which is an important basis for the establishment of independent preparatory crime in China's criminal law in one. In addition, China's criminal law in general The preparatory crime punishment principle and common judicial practice of conflict less punishment of preparatory crime reflects the rational choice of judicial organs. Compared with the general principle of punishment is controversial, the rational choice of the judiciary is more in line with the theory of criminal law and the criminal law principle of the contemporary, and this kind of rationality should also be reflected in the legislation, the provisions of the corresponding the independent preparatory crime. In addition, the focus of the study is independent of preparation for a crime is that independent preparatory crime, including independent preparatory crime, stopping form and accomplice form. That behavior of preparing acts and the implementation of the two concepts are different, in general there is a clear distinction. But the provisions in the criminal law independent preparatory crime after being prescribed to conduct preparatory acts for the transformation of the situation is the objective existence. Based on the behavior and the implementation of bank reserve For some reason analysis, and the process of transformation to implement the behavior to clarify the independent preparatory crime in original preparation behavior, and no type of behavior identified in substance. In the form of stop independent preparatory crime, this paper focuses on the independent preparatory crime is attempted, then, preparation and suspension are discussed in our country criminal law theory, the "start" is accomplished, the core conditions of attempted formation, therefore need to compare different theories of "start", the independent preparatory crime "to" judge, to define accomplished and attempted. For suspension of preparation for a crime and crime, different countries have different rules, so you need to start from the current legislation of our country with the traditional theory, clarify the independent preparatory crime preparation and the suspension can be established and whether it should be punished. In the form of independent accomplice of the crime in preparation, this paper first in total Made from the property that, based on the theory of joint behavior, to explore the establishment of an independent preparatory crime accomplice or not. At the same time, help the behavior independent of the preparatory crime and the implementation behavior is indistinguishable in practice, this article from the traditional theory, clearly independent preparatory crime boundaries and help to make the joint principal offender, to help make the distinction and the common principal offender. In the accomplice, besides the common perpetrator, abettor, also need through traditional theory proved the instigator, and for the two kinds of abetting acts and the implementation of content inconsistencies are explored.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 許海霞;預(yù)備犯研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 黃勁;預(yù)備犯處罰的立法完善研究[D];安徽財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

2 徐珊珊;論預(yù)備犯的可罰范圍和處罰原則[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

3 王健;我國(guó)預(yù)備犯處罰模式探討[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1759622