本文選題：自偵案件 + 立案監(jiān)督��； 參考：《延邊大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：檢察機(jī)關(guān)被我國憲法和法律定位為中華人民共和國法律監(jiān)督機(jī)關(guān),依法履行監(jiān)督職責(zé),保證國家的法律法規(guī)能得到正常、正確地實(shí)施,維護(hù)法制的權(quán)威與尊嚴(yán)。與此同時(shí),我國刑事訴訟法也明確規(guī)定,檢察機(jī)關(guān)有對(duì)貪污賄賂犯罪,瀆職犯罪,國家機(jī)關(guān)工作人員利用職權(quán)實(shí)施的刑訊逼供,報(bào)復(fù)陷害等案件有立案偵查權(quán)。檢察機(jī)關(guān)既是職務(wù)犯罪案件的偵查者,也是監(jiān)督者,因此,檢察機(jī)關(guān)處于打擊刑事犯罪和監(jiān)督訴訟的前沿陣地,在維護(hù)社會(huì)和諧穩(wěn)定、公平正義方面都起著相當(dāng)關(guān)鍵的作用。正因如此,如果檢察機(jī)關(guān)的自偵權(quán)缺乏有效的監(jiān)督,其權(quán)力就容易被濫用。司法實(shí)踐當(dāng)中,檢察機(jī)關(guān)的刑事立案監(jiān)督主要針對(duì)的是對(duì)公安機(jī)關(guān)的立案監(jiān)督,而對(duì)本單位自偵部門的立案監(jiān)督數(shù)量很少,且這部分由于法律沒有明確規(guī)定,且各種解釋、規(guī)定不夠細(xì)致全面,因此檢察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)自偵案件進(jìn)行的立案監(jiān)督缺乏可操作性,存在盲區(qū)。怎樣完善對(duì)自偵案件的立案監(jiān)督,形成依法、正確、規(guī)范、高效的職務(wù)犯罪立案監(jiān)督機(jī)制,是現(xiàn)如今檢察改革的重點(diǎn)也是難點(diǎn)之一。 本文的第一部分,立足于我國國情對(duì)檢察機(jī)關(guān)自偵案件立案監(jiān)督的含義進(jìn)行了簡單的闡述,并且對(duì)為什么要對(duì)檢察機(jī)關(guān)自偵案件進(jìn)行立案監(jiān)督的必要性進(jìn)行了解釋說明；第二部分本文的核心所在,以偵查監(jiān)督的法律理論為依據(jù),并且結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐工作,對(duì)我國自偵案件立案監(jiān)督的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了論述、并且對(duì)自偵案件立案監(jiān)督制度中所存在的問題進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的分析與論證；第三部分則在檢察機(jī)關(guān)自偵案件的立案監(jiān)督中存在的問題的基礎(chǔ)上提出了相關(guān)的完善建議,希望能為完善我國檢察機(jī)關(guān)自偵案件立案監(jiān)督盡微薄之力。
[Abstract]:The procuratorial organ is regarded as the legal supervision organ of the people's Republic of China by the constitution and the law. The procuratorial organ performs its supervisory duty according to law, guarantees the normal and correct implementation of the laws and regulations of the country, and maintains the authority and dignity of the legal system.At the same time, China's criminal procedure law also clearly stipulates that procuratorial organs have the right to file and investigate cases such as corruption and bribery crimes, dereliction of duty, extortion of confessions by state functionaries by means of their functions and powers, retaliation, and so on.The procuratorial organ is not only the investigator but also the supervisor of the duty crime case. Therefore, the procuratorial organ is in the front position of cracking down on the criminal crime and supervising the lawsuit, which plays a key role in maintaining social harmony and stability, fairness and justice.Therefore, if the procuratorial authority lacks effective supervision, its power will be easily abused.In judicial practice, the procuratorial organ's supervision of criminal case filing is mainly aimed at the supervision of the public security organ, but the number of the self-investigating departments of the unit is very small, and this is partly due to the lack of clear provisions of the law and various interpretations.The regulations are not detailed and comprehensive enough, so the procuratorial organ's supervision of self-investigating cases is not operable and blind zone exists.How to improve the supervision of self-investigation cases and form a legal, correct, standardized and efficient supervision mechanism on duty crimes is one of the most difficult points in the procuratorial reform.In the first part of this paper, based on the situation of our country, the meaning of the supervision of self-investigating cases of procuratorial organs is simply expounded, and the necessity of filing and supervising self-investigating cases of procuratorial organs is explained.The second part of the core of this article, based on the investigation and supervision of the legal theory, and combined with judicial practice, the status quo of self-investigating cases of supervision in China is discussed.And on the basis of the problems existing in the system of self-investigating cases filing and supervision, the third part puts forward some relevant suggestions on the basis of the problems in the supervision of self-investigation cases filed by the procuratorial organs.Hope to improve our procuratorial organs self-investigation of the case filing and supervision to do a meagre.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.36

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李海清;;以人為本與職務(wù)犯罪立案監(jiān)督關(guān)系辨析[J];傳承;2009年18期

2 張平;;檢察機(jī)關(guān)自偵案件監(jiān)督機(jī)制研究[J];河北法學(xué);2008年03期

3 潘路嘉;;檢察機(jī)關(guān)自偵案件立案監(jiān)督模式的比較[J];今日南國(理論創(chuàng)新版);2008年10期

4 陳德元 ,楊虹;自偵案件立案監(jiān)督模式之選擇[J];理論界;2003年03期

5 李文泉;孟凡豪;;完善職務(wù)犯罪立案監(jiān)督的思考[J];中國檢察官;2013年21期

6 徐蓉;;完善當(dāng)前立案監(jiān)督工作的思考[J];人民檢察;2007年13期

7 辛宇罡;;論檢察監(jiān)督權(quán)在我國的形成與發(fā)展[J];天津職業(yè)院校聯(lián)合學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期

8 黃一超,李浩;強(qiáng)化刑事立案監(jiān)督的若干問題探討[J];政治與法律;2001年03期

9 邵義祖;張少林;呂顥;;檢察機(jī)關(guān)自偵案件逮捕權(quán)上提一級(jí)問題研究[J];政治與法律;2009年07期

10 何群;;檢察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)自偵部門刑事立案監(jiān)督初探[J];科技咨詢導(dǎo)報(bào);2007年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1750825