發(fā)布時間：2018-04-11 23:26

  本文選題：貪污罪 + 共同犯罪��； 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：從“八項規(guī)定”的提出到“反四風(fēng)”建設(shè)的施行,一場反腐倡廉、正身自省的浪潮席卷而來。在此大背景下,對于貪污犯罪的研究,尤其是厘清群體化、復(fù)雜化的貪污罪共同犯罪,成了一個歷久彌新的命題,在司法實踐中具有重要的指導(dǎo)意義。 在材料的閱讀和整理過程中,筆者發(fā)現(xiàn),在該類犯罪的理論領(lǐng)域,研究與爭議并存。甚至在某些實踐問題中,犯罪定性的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和量刑的尺度也難以統(tǒng)一,這就為司法實踐帶來了困擾。針對這一系列問題,筆者通過借鑒前輩學(xué)者的一些先進理論經(jīng)驗,結(jié)合自身法學(xué)知識和實踐經(jīng)驗,運用比較分析、因果分析、實證分析以及文獻援引等研究方法,對貪污罪共同犯罪的幾個相關(guān)問題進行了分析,并提出了一些自己的見解。 本文共分四章： 第一章是貪污罪共同犯罪中存在的實踐與理論問題。在本章中,筆者根據(jù)司法實踐中出現(xiàn)的疑難問題,提出了刑事立法中對于共犯與身份定義的缺失問題,以及在貪污罪的共同犯罪中對各共犯人個人貪污數(shù)額的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不統(tǒng)一的問題,并指出以上兩類問題的存在,不利于對實踐的指導(dǎo)。 第二章是貪污罪共同犯罪認(rèn)定問題探析。在本章中,重點是有身份人與無身份人共起犯意,利用有身份人的職務(wù)之便,侵吞公共財產(chǎn)應(yīng)如何認(rèn)定的問題。該問題在學(xué)術(shù)界中存有廣泛的爭議,在此基礎(chǔ)上,筆者對該問題的一些觀點進行了詳細(xì)的分析論證,并初步提出了筆者自身對該問題的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 第三章是貪污罪共同犯罪中數(shù)額認(rèn)定與刑事責(zé)任問題探析。在本章中,筆者就如何理解貪污罪共同犯罪中“個人貪污數(shù)額”這一概念進行了分析。羅列了圍繞貪污罪共同犯罪中個人貪污數(shù)額認(rèn)定而確立的相關(guān)法條,以及各理論學(xué)說對此問題的不同看法,并初步提出了筆者自身對該問題的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 第四章是貪污罪共同犯罪的立法改進與完善。本章立意在于解決前述貪污罪共同犯罪存在的實踐問題,通過對各學(xué)說的甄別與凝練,提出在立法層面解決相關(guān)問題的對策。 總得來講,對于貪污罪共同犯罪的研究,一方面作用在于鞏固自己所學(xué)知識,指導(dǎo)未來工作實踐,另一方面也期望通過對該問題的分析總結(jié),提出自己的看法,對刑事理論研究提供有益的探索。
[Abstract]:From the "eight regulations" to the implementation of "anti-four winds" construction, a wave of anti-corruption and self-examination came.In this context, the study of corruption crime, especially the clarification of the group crime, the complex joint crime of corruption, has become a long-lasting proposition, has an important guiding significance in judicial practice.In the course of reading and sorting the materials, the author finds that in the theoretical field of this kind of crime, research and controversy coexist.Even in some practical problems, it is difficult to unify the criteria of crime characterization and sentencing, which brings difficulties to judicial practice.In view of this series of problems, the author uses comparative analysis, causality analysis, empirical analysis and literature reference through some advanced theoretical experience of predecessors, combining their own legal knowledge and practical experience, and so on research methods, such as comparative analysis, causality analysis, empirical analysis and literature reference, etc.This paper analyzes several related problems of joint crime of corruption crime, and puts forward some opinions.This paper is divided into four chapters:The first chapter is the problem of practice and theory in the joint crime of corruption.In this chapter, the author puts forward the lack of definition of accomplice and identity in criminal legislation according to the difficult problems in judicial practice.It also points out that the existence of the above two kinds of problems is not conducive to the guidance of practice.The second chapter is the problem of joint crime of corruption.In this chapter, the emphasis is on how to identify the embezzlement of public property by using the position of the identifiable person.On the basis of this, the author makes a detailed analysis and argumentation on some viewpoints of the problem, and puts forward the standards of the author's own identification of the problem.The third chapter is the joint crime of corruption in the determination of the amount and criminal liability.In this chapter, the author analyzes how to understand the concept of "personal embezzlement amount" in the joint crime of corruption.This paper lists the relevant articles of law about the determination of the amount of personal embezzlement in the joint crime of embezzlement, as well as the different views of various theories on this issue, and puts forward the author's own standards for the determination of the problem.The fourth chapter is the legislation improvement and perfection of the joint crime of corruption.The purpose of this chapter is to solve the problems existing in the aforementioned joint crime of corruption, through the screening and condensing of each theory, put forward the countermeasures to solve the related problems at the legislative level.In general, for the study of joint crime of corruption, on the one hand, the purpose is to consolidate what one has learned and to guide future work practices; on the other hand, he expects to put forward his own views through the analysis and summary of this problem.To the criminal theory research provides the beneficial exploration.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 夏夢娜;;淺析共同犯罪中的從犯類型及其刑事責(zé)任[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年01期

2 董邦俊;貪污罪的混合共犯及共犯數(shù)額[J];江南大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2004年04期

，

本文編號：1738150