本文選題：網(wǎng)絡(luò)　切入點(diǎn)：客觀解釋　出處：《法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào))》2017年03期

【摘要】：當(dāng)下我國(guó)刑法應(yīng)對(duì)日益嚴(yán)重的網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪,采取的主要手段是通過(guò)"探究社會(huì)秩序的客觀精神"以謀求對(duì)"社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)的客觀評(píng)價(jià)",在所有刑法解釋方法中,刑法客觀解釋輕易獲得了優(yōu)位權(quán)。然而,法律的形式主義與概念主義傳統(tǒng)固然有其缺陷不能否定,以擴(kuò)張為導(dǎo)向的刑法客觀解釋導(dǎo)致"客觀解釋等同于擴(kuò)張解釋",形成了網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代刑法網(wǎng)絡(luò)治理的入罪化,并造成法律公權(quán)力對(duì)技術(shù)性網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間自由的傷害,對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代公民自由權(quán)利的忽視。針對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間層出不窮的新型違法犯罪行為,應(yīng)警惕客觀解釋論的過(guò)度使用;結(jié)合主觀解釋論的法治基因優(yōu)勢(shì),宜以"主觀的客觀解釋論"重新塑造網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代刑法的客觀解釋論,即在網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪的解釋適用中,以客觀解釋為基礎(chǔ),同時(shí)其解釋不能超出"刑法條文的語(yǔ)言原意"之范圍,以主觀解釋作為客觀解釋之限定。
[Abstract]:At present, the criminal law of our country should deal with the increasingly serious cyber crime, the main means is to seek "objective evaluation of social reality" through "exploring the objective spirit of social order", and in all the methods of criminal law interpretation,Objective interpretation of criminal law has easily obtained superior position right.However, the tradition of formalism and conceptualism of law can not be denied. The objective interpretation of criminal law under the guidance of expansion leads to "objective interpretation is equal to the interpretation of expansion", which forms the criminalization of the network governance of criminal law in the network age.It also causes the harm of the legal public power to the freedom of the technical cyberspace and the neglect of the civil freedom right in the network age.In view of the emerging new type of illegal and criminal behavior in cyberspace, we should guard against the excessive use of objective explanation theory, combine the advantage of the rule of law gene of subjective interpretation theory,The subjective objective interpretation theory should be used to remodel the objective interpretation theory of the criminal law in the network age, that is, in the interpretation and application of the network crime, the objective interpretation should be based on the objective interpretation, and at the same time, its interpretation should not exceed the scope of "the original meaning of the language of the criminal law".Subjective interpretation is the limit of objective interpretation.
【作者單位】： 東南大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究規(guī)劃基金項(xiàng)目(15YJA820015)“刑法出罪機(jī)制問(wèn)題研究” 江蘇省社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重大項(xiàng)目(14ZD003)“把握互聯(lián)網(wǎng)'最大變量'核心問(wèn)題研究”
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 任彥君;;遺棄罪中扶養(yǎng)義務(wù)的詮釋——由一則案例引發(fā)的思考[J];華北水利水電學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2007年05期

2 魏漢濤;;以客觀解釋論解讀重婚罪[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

3 王政勛;;論客觀解釋立場(chǎng)與罪刑法定原則[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年01期

4 王周文;;論我國(guó)遺棄罪主體的范圍[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2011年07期

5 王軍仁;;刑法應(yīng)當(dāng)客觀解釋[J];人民檢察;2007年03期

6 關(guān)振海;;我國(guó)刑法第三條規(guī)定新論——基于客觀解釋的立場(chǎng)[J];四川師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

7 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1714783