本文選題：扒竊　切入點：公共場所　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：最新出臺的《最高人民法院、最高人民檢察院關(guān)于辦理盜竊刑事案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》對“扒竊”的定義是在公共場所或者公共交通工具上盜竊他人隨身攜帶的財物，“公共場所”和“隨身攜帶”是認(rèn)定扒竊的兩個核心要素。對“公共場所”和“隨身攜帶”的解釋應(yīng)當(dāng)從立法意圖和預(yù)期后果出發(fā)，“公共場所”的本質(zhì)屬性是人流量大并且人員組成不特定，這種本質(zhì)特征不受人為因素的影響，也不隨時間和人數(shù)的變化而變化；“隨身攜帶”應(yīng)當(dāng)作限縮解釋，僅僅指他人身上的財物。并且，對于“扒竊”屬于結(jié)果犯還是行為犯還存在爭議，這對“扒竊”行為的定性也十分重要，，“扒竊”屬于盜竊罪的一種行為方式，其侵犯的法益與普通盜竊行為是一致的，故其仍屬于結(jié)果犯的范疇，因而對于“扒竊”行為的既未遂的認(rèn)定應(yīng)當(dāng)參照盜竊罪。在理清“扒竊”的內(nèi)涵之后，我們需要進一步討論“扒竊”是否一律入罪的問題，根據(jù)立法意圖我們可以對一些“扒竊”偶犯、初犯等輕微“扒竊”作非罪化處理，而我國的二元立法模式和“但書”規(guī)定則是輕微“扒竊”出罪的依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:The newly promulgated Supreme people's Court, Interpretation by the Supreme people's Procuratorate on certain issues of the Law applicable to handling Criminal cases of Theft "pickpocketing" is defined as theft of property carried by others in public places or on public transport, "public places" and. "carrying with you" is the two core elements in determining pickpocketing. The interpretation of "public place" and "carry-on" should be based on the legislative intent and expected consequences. The essential attribute of "public place" is that the flow of people is large and the composition of personnel is not specific. This essential characteristic is not affected by human factors, nor does it change with time and number of persons; "carry with you" should be interpreted as limiting, referring only to property in others... and, There are still disputes about whether pickpocketing is a result crime or an act criminal, which is also very important to the characterization of "pickpocketing". Pickpocketing is a kind of behavior of larceny, and the legal interest of its infringement is consistent with that of ordinary theft. Therefore, it still belongs to the category of result crime, so the identification of the attempted act of "pickpocketing" should refer to the crime of larceny. After clarifying the connotation of "pickpocketing", we need to further discuss whether "pickpocketing" should be uniformly criminalized. According to the legislative intention, we can decriminalize some minor "pickpockets", such as "pickpocketing" and minor "pickpocketing", while the dualistic legislative model and the proviso of our country are the basis of the crime of minor "pickpocket".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.35

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李�；�,童偉華;論行為犯的構(gòu)造[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年06期

2 齊文遠(yuǎn);蘇彩霞;;刑法中的類型思維之提倡[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2010年01期

3 陳家林;;論刑法中的扒竊——對《刑法修正案(八)》的分析與解讀[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2011年04期

4 史衛(wèi)忠;;論我國刑法中行為犯的概念[J];法學(xué)家;2000年03期

5 彭文華;;論刑事法治視野中的犯罪既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];法學(xué)評論;2009年02期

6 馮亞東,胡東飛;犯罪既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)新論——以刑法目的為視角的剖析[J];法學(xué);2002年09期

7 付立慶;;論刑法對財產(chǎn)權(quán)保護中的均衡性原則[J];法學(xué);2011年05期

8 孫璐;;關(guān)于《刑法修正案(八)》中扒竊入罪的幾點思考[J];法制與社會;2012年09期

9 王志祥;張偉珂;;盜竊罪新增行為方式評析[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年05期

10 李俊英;潘庸魯;;扒竊與普通盜竊的適用界限[J];人民司法;2012年22期

本文編號：1689759