本文選題：網(wǎng)絡(luò)共同犯罪　切入點：組織犯　出處：《安徽大學》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)由以往的信息橋梁轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)楝F(xiàn)實生活空間的延伸平臺,公共空間與私人空間在網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界都已逐漸形成,網(wǎng)絡(luò)共同犯罪作為網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪的一部分,其內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)和外部表現(xiàn)的異化特征越來越明顯,僅僅適用傳統(tǒng)的共同犯罪形態(tài)認定理論將達不到很好的評價效果甚至會出現(xiàn)罪責刑不相適應(yīng)的弊端。隨著我國《刑法修正案(九)》的出臺,關(guān)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)共同犯罪中服務(wù)商的中立幫助行為有了歸罪依據(jù),這是對網(wǎng)絡(luò)異化下的幫助行為正犯化的回應(yīng),也是對傳統(tǒng)共犯理論改革的提示和建議。面對日益突出的網(wǎng)絡(luò)共同犯罪問題,理論方面的改革和立法方面的完善是兩大解決路徑。網(wǎng)絡(luò)共同犯罪問題的研究范圍主要包括純粹的以及傳統(tǒng)與網(wǎng)絡(luò)相結(jié)合的共同犯罪這兩種情形,二者共同之處在于不僅具有普通網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪的虛擬性、技術(shù)性、隱蔽性,并且在這些特性影響之下還產(chǎn)生了具體結(jié)構(gòu)上、行為方式上及分工作用上的變異。網(wǎng)絡(luò)共同犯罪異化表現(xiàn)之一是結(jié)構(gòu)方面的規(guī)模膨脹但各個行為人之間又極度松散；二是關(guān)于行為人之間意思聯(lián)絡(luò)和行為獨立化趨勢。網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中組織行為的主導地位逐漸從犯化,并且與教唆行為的界限模糊化,若繼續(xù)以主犯的標準衡量網(wǎng)絡(luò)組織行為將不符合罪責刑相適應(yīng)原則。同時,以組織犯為例實行者的身份與年齡認識問題也影響著其他共犯人的定罪量刑,如何運用傳統(tǒng)理論定性網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中的組織行為主要還是從主客觀方面出發(fā)明確行為性質(zhì)上的界限以及對對方身份和年齡的認識程度。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中,教唆者可能會以實質(zhì)性的幫助為誘惑唆使他人犯罪,從而此類唆使行為與幫助行為界限模糊不清,教唆對象的不特定性也提高了教唆犯的認定難度。本文主要從網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中教唆行為傳統(tǒng)理論的靈活調(diào)整適用明確該行為的主客觀構(gòu)成及與幫助行為的界限�，F(xiàn)有立法規(guī)定中立幫助行為獨立定罪,但幫助行為的正犯化還存在理論爭議,同時司法實踐中個案的多樣性和特殊性要求幫助行為的具體認定還需要完善和優(yōu)化。具體主要從網(wǎng)絡(luò)共同犯罪的一般性規(guī)定和具體性規(guī)定,明晰現(xiàn)有《刑法》對幫助行為認定標準之“情節(jié)嚴重”的設(shè)定。
[Abstract]:The network changes from the information bridge in the past to the extension platform of the real life space, the public space and the private space have gradually formed in the network world, the network joint crime is a part of the network crime. The dissimilation characteristics of its internal structure and external performance are becoming more and more obvious. Only applying the traditional theory of joint crime pattern identification will not achieve a very good evaluation effect or even appear the malpractice that the punishment of crime is not suitable. With the introduction of the Criminal Law Amendment (9) in our country, The neutral help behavior of the service provider in the network joint crime has the basis of imputation, which is the response to the network alienation. It is also a hint and suggestion for the reform of the traditional accomplice theory. In the face of the increasingly prominent problem of network joint crime, The theoretical reform and the legislative perfection are the two major ways to solve the problem. The research scope of the network joint crime mainly includes the two situations of pure and traditional joint crime combined with the network. What they have in common is that they not only have the fictitious, technical and hidden nature of ordinary cybercrime, but also produce concrete structure under the influence of these characteristics. One of the manifestations of the alienation of network common crime is the expansion of the scale of the structure but the extremely loose between the various actors; The second is about the tendency of intention communication and behavior independence among the actors. The dominant position of organizational behavior in cyberspace is becoming accessory gradually, and the boundary between organization and abetment is blurred. If we continue to measure the behavior of network organization according to the standard of the principal offender, it will not conform to the principle of adaptation of crime, responsibility and punishment. At the same time, the problem of identity and age cognition of the perpetrator, for example, will also affect the conviction and sentencing of other accomplices. How to use the traditional theory to characterize the organizational behavior in cyberspace is mainly to clarify the boundary of the nature of behavior and the understanding of the identity and age of each other from the subjective and objective aspects. An abettor may entice others to commit a crime with material assistance, thus blurring the line between such abetting and aiding, The instigator's non-specific nature also increases the difficulty of the instigator's identification. This paper makes clear the subjective and objective composition of the act and the boundary between the aiding behavior and the subject-objective composition of the act from the flexible adjustment of the traditional theory of abetting act in cyberspace. The legislation provides for neutral assistance in the criminalization of independent conduct, However, there is still a theoretical dispute over the criminal nature of aiding behavior. At the same time, the diversity and particularity of individual cases in judicial practice also need to be perfected and optimized. Clarify the existing Criminal Law to help the behavior of the identification of the standard of "serious circumstances" set.
【學位授予單位】：安徽大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D924.1

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 葉佳苗;李雅紅;;如何幫助行為退縮型兒童[J];教育藝術(shù);2006年09期

2 周學華,邵維國;幫助行為若干問題探討[J];長春師范學院學報;2003年04期

3 朱小燕;;在組織賣淫犯罪中公安干警的幫助行為應(yīng)如何定性[J];法制與社會;2009年36期

4 黎宏;;論中立的詐騙幫助行為之定性[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2012年06期

5 姜敏;;法益保護前置:刑法對食品安全保護的路徑選擇——以幫助行為正犯化為研究視角[J];北京師范大學學報(社會科學版);2013年05期

6 徐牧馳;;幫助型犯罪基本問題探討[J];鞍山師范學院學報;2005年05期

7 張偉;;中立幫助行為探微[J];中國刑事法雜志;2010年05期

8 張慧娟;;幫助犯的幫助行為[J];中國商界(下半月);2010年07期

9 勞文杰;;李某凱強奸案的爭議與分析——威脅下幫助行為的認定[J];中國檢察官;2011年14期

10 丑麗;楊波;;對基于特殊關(guān)系的中立幫助行為的出罪思考[J];學理論;2012年36期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 王宜貴;不知情而幫助搶劫的行為定性[N];江蘇法制報;2010年

2 中國政法大學研究生院副院長 教授 博士生導師 于志剛;應(yīng)對網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪,刑法立法司法均需及時跟進[N];人民法院報;2010年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前10條

1 郝浩;中立幫助行為的刑法規(guī)制[D];山東大學;2015年

2 車潤海;論刑法中的中立幫助行為[D];華東政法大學;2016年

3 劉長斌;幫助行為的“正犯化”研究[D];華東政法大學;2016年

4 鄭夢凌;中立的幫助行為研究[D];華東政法大學;2016年

5 薛丹丹;教唆、幫助行為的侵權(quán)責任承擔[D];安徽大學;2016年

6 陳丹;網(wǎng)絡(luò)共犯類型認定探析[D];安徽大學;2016年

7 陳琦;幫助行為獨立成罪的立法實踐之檢討[D];中國政法大學;2011年

8 齊懿;中立幫助行為的可處罰性研究[D];蘭州大學;2014年

9 盧峰;幫助行為研究[D];浙江工商大學;2015年

10 李奇;論幫助行為的“正犯化”[D];西南政法大學;2014年

，

本文編號：1689306