本文選題：聚眾　切入點：淫亂　出處：《西南政法大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：聚眾淫亂罪是在1997年刑法修訂時由原來的“流氓罪”分離而來的一個罪名，，屬于妨害社會管理秩序罪一章中的一種具體犯罪。然而近些年來，尤其是南京副教授馬堯海一案發(fā)生以后，關于聚眾淫亂罪的爭論越發(fā)激烈，圍繞著該罪的存廢出現(xiàn)了很多的觀點。本文從聚眾淫亂罪所侵犯的法益，何為聚眾、淫亂，何為首要分子與多次參加者及本罪的犯罪形態(tài)等爭議問題對聚眾淫亂罪進行解讀，以利司法實踐中能正確認定本罪，還指出我國現(xiàn)行相關立法存在的不足，提出了自己的完善建議。 全文共分三個部分。 第一部分聚眾淫亂罪概述。主要從聚眾淫亂罪的由來出發(fā)，通過對各個國家和地區(qū)關于該類型犯罪的規(guī)定的介紹，看出其他國家或地區(qū)的刑事立法對公然的淫亂行為或猥褻行為，無論參與者的多寡均認定為犯罪。而對于成人間自愿私密的淫亂行為，排除于犯罪之外。這些作法具有合理性值得我國借鑒。 第二部分聚眾淫亂罪認定中幾個爭議問題。在這部份分析了本罪侵犯的法益是社會風化，聚眾的含義是包括聚眾者在內有三人或三人以上；淫亂的含義指男女性器官結合的自然性行為和同性或異性之間的口交、肛交行為。本罪是復行為犯，聚眾為著手，實施了淫亂,而不管淫亂行為是否完成均為既遂。 第三部分聚眾淫亂罪的立法缺陷及修改建議。在本部份分析了現(xiàn)行刑法將成人自愿、私密進行的多人淫亂行為納入犯罪圈不具合理性，而對當眾進行的兩人間的淫亂或猥褻行為又無法治罪。應廢除本罪，新增公然淫亂、猥褻罪，并嚴格限定公然、猥褻的具體含義。
[Abstract]:The crime of mass adultery is a separate crime from the original "hooliganism" when the Criminal Law was amended in 1997. It is a specific crime in the chapter on the crime of endangering the social management order. However, in recent years, Especially after the case of Ma Yao-hai, an associate professor in Nanjing, the debate on the crime of mass adultery has become more and more intense, and many viewpoints have emerged around the retention and abolition of the crime. What are the controversial issues, such as ringleader, multiple participants and the criminal form of this crime, to interpret the crime of mass prostitution in order to correctly identify this crime in judicial practice, and also to point out the shortcomings of the current relevant legislation in our country? Put forward own perfect suggestion. The paper is divided into three parts. The first part is an overview of the crime of mass adultery. Mainly from the origin of the crime of mass adultery, through the introduction of the provisions of various countries and regions on this type of crime, It can be seen that the criminal legislation of other countries or regions regards blatant obscenity or indecent conduct as a crime, regardless of the number of participants. These practices are reasonable and worthy of our country's reference. In the second part, the author analyzes that the legal interest of this crime is social decency, which means that there are three or more people including the crowd; The meaning of promiscuity refers to the natural sexual behavior of the combination of male and female sexual organs and the oral sex and anal sex between the same sex and the opposite sex. This crime is a double act crime, gathering a crowd to carry out sexual promiscuity, regardless of whether the promiscuous act is completed or not, it is accomplished. The third part analyzes the legislative defects and amendment proposals of the crime of mass fornication. In this part, the author analyzes that it is not reasonable for the current criminal law to bring into the criminal circle multi-person sexual promiscuity, which is carried out voluntarily and privately by adults. But the public conduct between two persons of obscenity or indecency can not be criminalized. Should abolish this crime, new public obscenity, indecent assault, and strictly limit the specific meaning of open, indecent.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 張明楷;論刑法的謙抑性[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);1995年04期

2 張正新,金澤剛;論我國刑法中的聚眾犯罪[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);1997年05期

3 李銀河;;對取消聚眾淫亂罪提案的解釋[J];法制資訊;2010年04期

4 何顯兵;論男性貞操權的刑法保護[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2004年04期

5 王銳園;;對我國刑法中聚眾淫亂罪的思考[J];湖北經(jīng)濟學院學報(人文社會科學版);2012年01期

6 王恩海;;無被害人犯罪與非犯罪化[J];華東刑事司法評論;2004年02期

7 黃京平;陳鵬展;;無被害人犯罪非犯罪化研究[J];江海學刊;2006年04期

8 李銀河;中國當代性法律批判[J];南京師大學報(社會科學版);2004年01期

9 張野馳;;淺析聚眾淫亂罪[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學院學報;2012年02期

10 彭文華;性權利的國際保護及我國刑法立法之完善[J];法學論壇;2002年05期

本文編號：1686905