本文選題：共同犯罪　切入點(diǎn)：犯罪中止　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文圍繞在共同犯罪中部分共犯中止犯罪問(wèn)題展開(kāi)研究。首先,對(duì)共同犯罪、犯罪中止及部分共犯中止分別進(jìn)行介紹。其次,介紹國(guó)內(nèi)外部分共犯中止問(wèn)題學(xué)說(shuō)論爭(zhēng)及立法例,并進(jìn)行觀點(diǎn)評(píng)析。第三,在反思我國(guó)部分共犯中止理論存在的問(wèn)題,重構(gòu)部分共犯中止理論,提出部分共犯中止認(rèn)定的基本準(zhǔn)則。最后,基于重構(gòu)后部分共犯中止理論分別對(duì)組織犯中止、教唆犯中止、幫助犯中止、實(shí)行犯中止的認(rèn)定進(jìn)行研究。全文共分四章。 第一章,共同犯罪中部分共犯中止。首先,介紹共同犯罪,包括共同犯罪的模式、特點(diǎn)和我國(guó)共同犯罪的成立條件。其次,介紹犯罪中止,包括中止犯減免刑罰的根據(jù)、犯罪中止的特征和我國(guó)犯罪中止的成立條件。第三,在介紹分別共同犯罪及犯罪中止的基礎(chǔ)上,提出部分共犯中止,通過(guò)國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者對(duì)部分共犯中止的理解與比較,提出本文觀點(diǎn)。 第二章,國(guó)內(nèi)外部分共犯中止問(wèn)題學(xué)說(shuō)論爭(zhēng)及立法例。首先,國(guó)外部分共犯中止問(wèn)題學(xué)說(shuō)論爭(zhēng)、立法例及評(píng)析。其次,我國(guó)的部分共犯問(wèn)題論爭(zhēng)、立法例及評(píng)析。第三,通過(guò)客觀主義學(xué)說(shuō)與主觀主義學(xué)說(shuō)的比較研究和共犯中止原因力消除說(shuō)與共犯脫離說(shuō)的比較研究,提出筆者觀點(diǎn)。 第三章,我國(guó)部分共犯中止的反思與理論重構(gòu)。首先,反思我國(guó)部分共犯中止存在問(wèn)題、分析現(xiàn)存理論缺陷的基礎(chǔ)上。其次,借鑒不同理論學(xué)說(shuō)的優(yōu)點(diǎn),以共犯中止原因力消除說(shuō)理論為主線,準(zhǔn)中止犯理論為補(bǔ)充,重構(gòu)部分共犯中止的理論依據(jù),提出部分共犯中止認(rèn)定的基本準(zhǔn)則。 第四章,重構(gòu)后部分共犯中止理論的司法認(rèn)定。依據(jù)行為人在共同犯罪中的角色分工不同的分類,將共犯分為組織犯、實(shí)行犯、教唆犯和幫助犯,本章將基于重構(gòu)后的部分共犯中止理論,從不同犯罪階段分別對(duì)組織犯中止、教唆犯中止、幫助犯中止、實(shí)行犯中止的認(rèn)定進(jìn)行研究。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the suspension of some accomplices in the joint crime. Firstly, it introduces the joint crime, the suspension of the crime and the suspension of part of the accomplice respectively. Secondly, it introduces the theoretical arguments and legislative examples of the suspension of some accomplices at home and abroad. Third, it reflects on the problems existing in the theory of partial accomplice suspension in our country, reconstructs the theory of partial accomplice suspension, and puts forward the basic criteria for the determination of partial accomplice suspension. Based on the theory of suspension of part accomplice after reconstruction, this paper studies the termination of organized crime, abettor suspension, assistant offender suspension, and the suspension of accomplice respectively. The full text is divided into four chapters. The first chapter, the suspension of some accomplices in the joint crime. Firstly, it introduces the pattern, characteristics and the conditions of establishment of the joint crime in China. Secondly, it introduces the basis for the suspension of the crime, including the remission of the penalty for the suspension of the crime. The characteristics of the suspension of crime and the conditions for the suspension of crime in China. Thirdly, on the basis of introducing respectively the joint crime and the suspension of the crime, the author puts forward the suspension of some accomplices, and through the understanding and comparison of scholars at home and abroad to the suspension of some accomplices, Put forward the viewpoint of this paper. The second chapter, the domestic and foreign part accomplice suspension theory argument and the legislation example. First, the foreign partial accomplice suspension theory argument, the legislation example and the appraisal. Secondly, our country partial accomplice question debate, the legislation example and the appraisal. Third, the foreign partial accomplice suspension theory argument, the legislation example and the appraisal. Through the comparative study of objectivism theory and subjectivism theory and the comparative study of the theory of eliminating the cause of accomplice suspension and the theory of accomplice separation, the author puts forward the author's viewpoint. Chapter three, reflection and theoretical reconstruction of the suspension of some accomplices in our country. First, reflecting on the problems existing in the suspension of some accomplices in our country, and analyzing the existing theoretical defects. Secondly, drawing on the advantages of different theories, Taking the theory of eliminating the cause of accomplice suspension as the main line, the theory of quasi-suspending offense as a supplement, reconstructing the theoretical basis of partial accomplice suspension, this paper puts forward the basic criteria for the determination of partial accomplice suspension. The fourth chapter, the judicial cognizance of the theory of suspension of part accomplice after reconstruction. According to the different classification of the roles of the perpetrator in the joint crime, the accomplice is divided into the organized crime, the practicing crime, the abettor and the aider. Based on the theory of partial accomplice suspension after reconstruction, this chapter studies the termination of organized crime, abettor suspension, assistant offender suspension and criminal suspension from different crime stages.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李立豐;;犯意之于美國(guó)刑法中的共謀[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年04期

2 林俊輝;張淑芳;;英美刑法共謀罪屬性述評(píng)[J];福建警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

3 黃麗勤;;論共犯關(guān)系之脫離[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年04期

4 張紅艷;;論德日刑法的犯罪支配理論與共謀共同正犯[J];河北法學(xué);2011年09期

5 王亞軍;;共犯脫離與共犯中止之比較分析[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

6 金澤剛;;論共犯關(guān)系之脫離[J];法學(xué)研究;2006年02期

7 趙志強(qiáng);翟宇;;犯罪中止制度若干問(wèn)題探微[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年08期

8 陳瑞林,楊志成;共犯中止的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)論析[J];汕頭大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

9 蔡晚拴;;共同犯罪中犯罪中止有效性問(wèn)題研究[J];陜西行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

10 岳啟杰;;淺論共同犯罪的中止[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1681442