發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-29 08:39

  本文選題：出售　切入點(diǎn)：非法提供公民個(gè)人信息罪　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：2009年《刑法修正案（七）》針對(duì)侵犯公民個(gè)人信息現(xiàn)象頻發(fā)的實(shí)際情況，增設(shè)出售、非法提供公民個(gè)人信息罪和非法獲取公民個(gè)人信息罪作為我國(guó)《刑法》第二百五十三條之一的第一、二款，借以打擊嚴(yán)重侵犯公民個(gè)人信息安全的犯罪行為。雖然我國(guó)在《個(gè)人信息保護(hù)法》尚未出臺(tái)的情況下對(duì)兩罪名的增設(shè)實(shí)際上是民法未動(dòng)、刑法先行，大有違反刑法二次性違法理論之嫌，但面對(duì)嚴(yán)峻的社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)，刑法對(duì)公民個(gè)人信息保護(hù)的提前介入是極為必要的。兩罪名的增設(shè)喚醒了社會(huì)公眾維護(hù)個(gè)人信息安全的法律意識(shí)，我國(guó)刑法理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界對(duì)兩罪名在懲處和遏制個(gè)人信息犯罪方面寄予厚望。 然而，新事物在初生之際總會(huì)遇到困難和阻礙，，實(shí)際上，兩罪名在近五年的適用過(guò)程中，并未發(fā)揮為人所期待的效果，這集中表現(xiàn)為侵害公民個(gè)人信息安全現(xiàn)象依然嚴(yán)重，而兩罪名的司法適用顯有不足，社會(huì)公眾對(duì)個(gè)人信息受侵深有體會(huì)，卻又感到違法犯罪行為得不到有效控制。與此同時(shí)，刑事司法實(shí)務(wù)人員也多認(rèn)為當(dāng)前兩罪名在法律適用上存在障礙，其中以出售、非法提供公民個(gè)人信息罪的適用最為困難。該罪主要針對(duì)信息來(lái)源問(wèn)題，重點(diǎn)打擊在正常狀態(tài)下有權(quán)接觸并獲得公民個(gè)人信息的單位及其工作人員違反國(guó)家規(guī)定擅自將其所掌握的信息提供給他人的嚴(yán)重違法行為，致力于從源頭上控制侵害公民個(gè)人信息犯罪，其立法意圖值得推崇。在邏輯上，把好信息安全的源頭關(guān)對(duì)于預(yù)防和打擊侵害公民個(gè)人信息安全犯罪最具價(jià)值，然而出售、非法提供公民個(gè)人信息罪面臨的英雄無(wú)用武之地的尷尬局面使我們不得不反思其原因，并尋求有效的決絕之道。 本文針對(duì)出售、非法提供公民個(gè)人信息罪在刑事司法實(shí)踐中存在的適用難題，旨在分析問(wèn)題存在的原因，探究解決問(wèn)題的對(duì)策。因此，本文在結(jié)構(gòu)上分為三個(gè)部分：第一部分為本文第一章，出售、非法提供公民個(gè)人信息罪的概述，主要從刑法學(xué)理論角度闡釋出售、非法提供公民個(gè)人信息罪的立法背景、意義以及本罪名的定義、構(gòu)成要件等內(nèi)容。第二部分為本文的第二章至第四章，對(duì)出售、非法提供公民個(gè)人信息罪在適用中存在的三方面常見(jiàn)問(wèn)題（公民個(gè)人信息概念不明的問(wèn)題、犯罪主體范疇解釋的問(wèn)題、缺乏具體入罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的問(wèn)題）進(jìn)行分析，繼而提出具有針對(duì)性和可操作性的對(duì)策。第三部分為本文結(jié)語(yǔ)，對(duì)本文前述問(wèn)題進(jìn)行總結(jié)性論述。 為了更加科學(xué)的對(duì)出售、非法提供公民個(gè)人信息罪進(jìn)行刑法學(xué)分析，本文主要運(yùn)用概念分析方法、文獻(xiàn)研究方法、比較方法、社會(huì)調(diào)查方法及案例分析方法等法學(xué)研究方法，從不同角度對(duì)本論題進(jìn)行深入研究，力求通過(guò)客觀、嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)恼撟C過(guò)程，得出具有應(yīng)用價(jià)值的合理結(jié)論。
[Abstract]:In 2009, the Criminal Law Amendment (7) aimed at the actual situation of frequent violations of citizens' personal information, The crime of illegally providing personal information to citizens and the crime of illegally obtaining personal information of citizens are the first and second paragraphs of Article 253 of the Criminal Law of our country. In order to crack down on the crime of seriously violating the personal information security of citizens. Although the addition of two charges in our country under the circumstances of the Law on the Protection of personal Information has not yet been promulgated, in fact the civil law has not been moved, and the criminal law is leading the way. There is a great suspicion of violating the theory of secondary violation of the criminal law, but in the face of severe social reality, it is extremely necessary for the criminal law to intervene in advance in the protection of citizens' personal information. The establishment of the two charges has awakened the public's legal consciousness of maintaining the security of personal information. The theory and practice of criminal law in our country place great hope in punishing and curbing personal information crime. However, new things always encounter difficulties and obstacles when they are born. In fact, in the process of application of the two charges in the past five years, they have not played the desired effect, which concentrated on the fact that the phenomenon of infringing on citizens' personal information security is still serious. But the judicial application of the two charges is obviously inadequate, the public has a deep understanding of personal information, but they feel that illegal and criminal behavior can not be effectively controlled at the same time, Criminal justice practitioners also think that there are obstacles in the application of the law for the current two crimes, among which the crime of selling and illegally providing citizens' personal information is the most difficult one. The crime is mainly aimed at the problem of the source of information. Focusing on cracking down on serious illegal acts by units and their staff members who have the right to have access to and obtain personal information from citizens under normal conditions and who, in violation of state regulations, provide information in their possession to others without authorization, In order to control the crime of infringing personal information from the source, its legislative intention is worthy of praise. Logically, it is the most valuable for preventing and combating the crime of infringing personal information security to close the source of good information security. The embarrassing situation that the heroes have no chance to display their talents in the crime of illegally providing citizens' personal information makes us have to reflect on its causes and seek effective ways to resolve them. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the causes of the problem and explore the countermeasures to solve the problem, aiming at the difficult problem of the crime of selling and illegally providing personal information of citizens in the criminal justice practice. The structure of this paper is divided into three parts: the first part is the summary of the crime of illegally providing citizens' personal information, which mainly explains the legislative background of the crime of selling and illegally providing personal information of citizens from the angle of criminal law theory. The meaning, the definition of the crime, the elements of the crime and so on. The second part is divided into the second chapter of this article, chapters 2 to 4, the sale, There are three common problems in the application of the crime of illegally providing citizens' personal information, such as the problem of unclear concept of citizen's personal information, the problem of explaining the category of criminal subject, the lack of specific standard of incrimination, etc. The third part is the conclusion of this paper. In order to scientifically analyze the crime of selling and illegally providing citizens' personal information, this paper mainly uses the methods of concept analysis, literature research, comparison, social investigation and case analysis, etc. From different angles, this thesis is studied deeply, and through the objective and rigorous argumentation process, a reasonable conclusion with application value is obtained.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 井慧寶;常秀嬌;;個(gè)人信息概念的厘定[J];法律適用;2011年03期

2 利子平;周建達(dá);;非法獲取公民個(gè)人信息罪“情節(jié)嚴(yán)重”初論[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2012年05期

3 袁海鴻;;手機(jī)定位是否屬于非法獲取公民個(gè)人信息犯罪[J];電子制作;2012年11期

4 沈黎紅;顏艷;彭昊;;售樓員800元“出賣(mài)”業(yè)主信息被判刑[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(上旬);2013年11期

本文編號(hào)：1680371