本文選題：安樂(lè)死　切入點(diǎn)：自我決定權(quán)　出處：《天津師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在人類歷史長(zhǎng)河中,無(wú)論古今中外,自殺都是人類社會(huì)普遍存在的一種社會(huì)現(xiàn)象。隨著科技和社會(huì)的發(fā)展進(jìn)步,人類生活節(jié)奏加快,競(jìng)爭(zhēng)日趨激烈,社會(huì)成員間矛盾沖突時(shí)有發(fā)生,人類所面臨的生活、學(xué)習(xí)、工作乃至環(huán)境的壓力都在不斷地增大,導(dǎo)致許多國(guó)家的自殺現(xiàn)象都在增加。筆者從近年來(lái)一直有爭(zhēng)議的安樂(lè)死問(wèn)題上引出自殺這一社會(huì)問(wèn)題,其背后的法理,即死的自我決定權(quán)該如何去定義,并在這一基礎(chǔ)上探討對(duì)于與自殺相關(guān)的參與自殺、同意自殺的處罰根據(jù)。力圖在我國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑法的框架之下,參開(kāi)國(guó)外刑法的相關(guān)規(guī)定,給參與自殺行為尋找較為準(zhǔn)確的法律定位。本文分為四部分,對(duì)上述問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探討。 第一部分是從安樂(lè)死、尊嚴(yán)死引出死的自我決定權(quán)。本部分主從要安樂(lè)死、尊嚴(yán)死在國(guó)內(nèi)外法益理論和實(shí)務(wù)中的區(qū)別進(jìn)行分析。由此引出對(duì)自我決定權(quán)這一前提的懷疑,討論自我決定論與生命價(jià)值之間的關(guān)系。 第二部分主要探討自殺的法的性質(zhì)。本部分主要包括合法說(shuō)、可罰的違法阻卻說(shuō)及責(zé)任阻卻說(shuō)這三種學(xué)說(shuō)、自殺違法、合法的意義以及自殺違法的根據(jù)。 第三部分進(jìn)入探討參與自殺、同意殺人的處罰根據(jù)。首先從同意殺人的處罰根據(jù),即被害者的承諾這一點(diǎn)上開(kāi)始分析參與自殺的處罰根據(jù)。最后討論不自由意思同安樂(lè)死之間關(guān)系。 第四部分,“不自由”的自殺意思和自殺與他殺的關(guān)系。本部分內(nèi)容主要包括自手論和他手論、禁止他手論的詳細(xì)理由等問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:In the long course of human history, suicide is a common social phenomenon in human society, both at all times and at home and abroad. With the development of science and technology and social progress, the pace of human life is accelerating and the competition is becoming increasingly fierce. Contradictions and conflicts among members of society occur from time to time, and the pressure on human beings to live, study, work and even the environment is constantly increasing. This has led to an increase in the phenomenon of suicide in many countries. The author draws the social question of suicide from the controversial issue of euthanasia in recent years. The legal theory behind it, that is, how to define the self-decision of death, And on this basis, it discusses the punishment basis for suicide-related participation and consent to suicide. Under the framework of China's current criminal law, it tries to open up the relevant provisions of foreign criminal law. This article is divided into four parts to discuss the above problems. The first part is the self-decision of death from euthanasia, dignity death. This part analyzes the difference between euthanasia and dignity death in the theory and practice of legal interest at home and abroad. Discuss the relationship between self-determinism and life value. The second part mainly discusses the nature of the law of suicide. The third part goes into the discussion of the punishment basis of taking part in suicide and agreeing to kill. That is, the victim's commitment to begin to analyze the basis of punishment for participation in suicide. Finally, discuss the relationship between the meaning of non-freedom and euthanasia. The fourth part is about the meaning of "not free" suicide and the relationship between suicide and homicide. The contents of this part mainly include the theory of self hand and the theory of his hand, the detailed reasons of prohibiting his theory of hand and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D914

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 王貴松;;自殺問(wèn)題的國(guó)家立場(chǎng)[J];北方法學(xué);2009年05期

2 馮軍;刑法的規(guī)范化詮釋[J];法商研究;2005年06期

3 錢葉六;;對(duì)向犯若干問(wèn)題研究[J];法商研究;2011年06期

4 倪宇奇;聶新國(guó);;論教唆他人自殺的法律性質(zhì)[J];湖北行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年S2期

5 陳軍;相約自殺過(guò)程中為自保致對(duì)方死亡應(yīng)如何定性[J];檢察實(shí)踐;2003年05期

6 盧勤忠;邪教自殺案件的刑法分析[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2002年06期

7 馮軍;;刑法中的自我答責(zé)[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2006年03期

8 陳興良;教唆或者幫助他人自殺行為之定性研究——邵建國(guó)案分析[J];浙江社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1678906