本文選題：受賄罪　切入點(diǎn)：法定刑　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：懲治受賄等腐敗犯罪是廉政建設(shè)重點(diǎn),構(gòu)建合理的受賄罪法定刑對(duì)預(yù)防和懲治腐敗犯罪有重要意義。而當(dāng)前我國(guó)受賄罪法定刑采取與貪污罪法定刑相同的做法,在生命刑、財(cái)產(chǎn)刑、自由刑、資格刑等內(nèi)容上產(chǎn)生了諸多問(wèn)題,明顯不能適應(yīng)當(dāng)前經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)形勢(shì)及司法工作的需要。學(xué)界在上述問(wèn)題上也并未達(dá)成一致意見(jiàn)。故文章擬在借鑒古今中外受賄罪的法定刑先進(jìn)做法基礎(chǔ)之上,聯(lián)系我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐,從生命刑、自由刑、財(cái)產(chǎn)刑等角度對(duì)受賄罪的法定刑進(jìn)行探索并予以完善。全文分為以下幾個(gè)部分： 第一部分對(duì)我國(guó)古代、民主革命時(shí)期、建國(guó)后關(guān)于受賄罪法定刑的沿革和特點(diǎn)予以概括,并且同當(dāng)今刑法規(guī)定對(duì)比,總結(jié)古今異同。 第二部分聯(lián)系當(dāng)前司法實(shí)踐情況,總結(jié)受賄罪法定刑規(guī)定存在的問(wèn)題,這些問(wèn)題包括受賄罪死刑是否應(yīng)當(dāng)廢除及如何發(fā)展替代性措施、以數(shù)額作為受賄罪定罪量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是否合理、以五千元作為受賄罪的起點(diǎn)是否適應(yīng)當(dāng)前經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展形勢(shì)之需要、怎樣處理犯罪數(shù)額與犯罪情節(jié)的關(guān)系、自由刑檔次和幅度交叉重復(fù)問(wèn)題如何解決、受賄罪財(cái)產(chǎn)刑中罰金刑與沒(méi)收財(cái)產(chǎn)刑如何選擇適用、在受賄罪法定刑中如何增加資格刑等。 第三部分以典型國(guó)家和地區(qū)作為代表,對(duì)其受賄罪的法定刑規(guī)定予以闡釋,對(duì)比和借鑒其合理成分并予以分析。例如美國(guó)在受賄罪的財(cái)產(chǎn)刑上很少適用沒(méi)收財(cái)產(chǎn)這種刑罰,德國(guó)針對(duì)不同的公務(wù)身份在受賄罪法定刑上設(shè)置不同的法定刑,這些做法對(duì)我國(guó)當(dāng)前受賄罪法定刑完善不乏借鑒的可能性。 第四部分針對(duì)當(dāng)前我國(guó)受賄罪法定刑存在的問(wèn)題,借鑒國(guó)內(nèi)外受賄罪法定刑規(guī)定中的合理做法,從以下途徑予以完善：一是建議取消死刑的適用；二是建立銜接有序、檔次合理的自由刑；三是增設(shè)罰金刑且限制沒(méi)收財(cái)產(chǎn)刑的適用；四是完善資格刑內(nèi)容。
[Abstract]:Punishing the crime of corruption bribery is the key construction, reasonable construction of the bribery crime legal punishment to prevent and punish the crime of corruption is of great significance. And the legal punishment of bribery crime in our country take legal punishment and corruption in the same way, life penalty, freedom penalty, property penalty, qualification penalty and so on has many problems obviously, can not adapt to the needs of the current economic and social situation and judicial work. Scholars on the issue has not reached a consensus. So this article on the basis of legal punishment practices at all times and in all countries of the crime of accepting bribes, with China's judicial practice, from the death penalty, freedom penalty, legal punishment of bribery criminal property the angle of exploration and to be perfect. The full text is divided into the following parts:
The first part generalizes the evolution and characteristics of the statutory penalty for bribery crime in ancient China during the period of democratic revolution, and summarizes the similarities and differences between ancient and modern times compared with the provisions of today's criminal law.
The second part with the current judicial practice, summarize the existing provisions of the legal punishment of bribery crime problems, these problems include the bribery crime whether the death penalty should be abolished and how to develop alternative measures, as to the amount of bribery conviction and sentencing standards is reasonable, whether the starting point to five thousand yuan as the crime of accepting bribes to meet the needs of the current economic development situation, how to to deal with the relationship between the amount of crime and crime plot, freedom penalty grade and amplitude overlapping how to solve the problem, the bribery crime in the property penalty of fine penalty and the penalty of confiscation of property is how to choose, how to increase the qualification penalty in the legal punishment of bribery crime.
The third part of the typical countries and regions as the representative, the provisions of its legal punishment of bribery crime is explained, comparing and drawing lessons from the reasonable composition were analyzed. Such as the United States in the bribery crime penalty of property confiscation of property is rarely this penalty in Germany for different setting official body different legal punishment in legal punishment of bribery crime on the practice of China's current legal punishment of bribery crime has the possibility to perfect reference.
The fourth part of the legal punishment of bribery crime in our country currently existing problems, from domestic and foreign bribery provisions of the statutory sentence of the crime in a reasonable approach, to be perfect from the following ways: one is that for the abolition of the death penalty; the two is the establishment of cohesion and orderly, reasonable grade of imprisonment; three is additional fines and confiscation of property restrictions apply punishment; the four is to improve the qualification penalty.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.392

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫恒山;“腐敗”概念的分析與刑法學(xué)思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年01期

2 梁統(tǒng);資格刑之反思與重構(gòu)——以剝奪政治權(quán)利為視角[J];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年02期

3 袁登明;;尋求緩解財(cái)產(chǎn)刑執(zhí)行難之道在現(xiàn)有法律框架下的制度創(chuàng)建[J];法律適用;2006年07期

4 應(yīng)秀良;;以罰金繳納作為減刑條件的制度思考[J];法律適用;2007年01期

5 馬克昌;;“寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)”刑事政策與刑罰立法的完善[J];法商研究;2007年01期

6 李海瀅;麻銳;;腐敗犯罪控制視野下的資格刑研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年07期

7 謝望原;;歐陸刑罰改革成就與我國(guó)刑罰方法重構(gòu)[J];法學(xué)家;2006年01期

8 陳雷;國(guó)際反腐敗法律機(jī)制中的資產(chǎn)追回制度[J];法學(xué);2004年08期

9 葉小琴;中國(guó)古代受賄犯罪立法的歷史考察[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

10 楊彩霞;沒(méi)收財(cái)產(chǎn)刑的困境與出路[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1661479