本文選題：危險(xiǎn)方法　切入點(diǎn)：過(guò)于自信過(guò)失　出處：《遼寧大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái)，隨著惡性交通肇事案件頻發(fā)，各地司法機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)以危險(xiǎn)方法危害公共安全罪在公共交通運(yùn)輸領(lǐng)域的適用頻率亦呈上升趨勢(shì)。而關(guān)于交通肇事罪與以危險(xiǎn)方法危險(xiǎn)公共安全罪的界分，，學(xué)界觀點(diǎn)并不十分明確，而當(dāng)前司法機(jī)關(guān)的通常做法卻是以交通肇事危害后果的嚴(yán)重程度來(lái)考量罪名的適用，這顯然是不符合刑法規(guī)定的。因此，對(duì)于交通肇事罪與以危險(xiǎn)方法危害公共安全罪作出明確的界分，對(duì)“危險(xiǎn)方法”作出準(zhǔn)確的闡釋?zhuān)鞘钟斜匾摹?本文通過(guò)分析交通肇事罪與以危險(xiǎn)方法危害公共安全罪的核心區(qū)別，并結(jié)合其在我國(guó)刑法體系中的關(guān)系，歸納、總結(jié)二罪分別在客觀方面、主觀方面的界限，以達(dá)到將二罪界分開(kāi)來(lái)的目的。全文共分三個(gè)部分。 第一部分，包括經(jīng)典案件的案情介紹及爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)歸納，提出問(wèn)題，并為論文主體部分的分析內(nèi)容提供切入點(diǎn)。 第二部分是論文的主體及核心部分。界分交通肇事罪與以危險(xiǎn)方法危害公共安全罪，首先，對(duì)于何為“危險(xiǎn)方法”作出分析與討論，對(duì)“危險(xiǎn)方法”的本質(zhì)及內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行揭示；其次，區(qū)分過(guò)于自信過(guò)失與間接故意，并聯(lián)系實(shí)際探討具體情況下行為人主觀罪過(guò)的認(rèn)定問(wèn)題；再次，分析交通肇事罪能否轉(zhuǎn)化為以危險(xiǎn)方法危害公共安全罪；最后，分析“二次沖撞”理論的實(shí)質(zhì)，并對(duì)最高人民法院《關(guān)于醉酒駕車(chē)犯罪法律適用問(wèn)題的意見(jiàn)》進(jìn)行評(píng)析。 第三部分，評(píng)析案件，結(jié)合本文觀點(diǎn)對(duì)論文第一部分所提出的爭(zhēng)議案件進(jìn)行分析討論，用從實(shí)際案例分析的角度總結(jié)二罪的界分，并表達(dá)論文主旨。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the frequent occurrence of malignant traffic accidents, The judicial organs in various places also have an upward trend in the application frequency of the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous methods in the field of public transportation. However, the academic community does not have a clear view on the distinction between the crime of causing traffic accidents and the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous methods. At present, however, the normal practice of the judicial organs is to consider the application of the charges on the basis of the seriousness of the harm caused by the traffic accident. This is obviously not in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Law. It is very necessary to distinguish the crime of causing traffic trouble from the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous method and to give an accurate explanation of "dangerous method". Based on the analysis of the core differences between traffic accident crime and the crime of endangering public security by dangerous methods, and the relationship between the crime and the criminal law system of our country, this paper sums up the boundary of the two crimes in objective and subjective aspects, respectively. In order to achieve the purpose of separating the two crimes, the paper is divided into three parts. The first part, including the case of classic cases and the focus of controversy induction, put forward questions, and provide a breakthrough point for the main part of the paper analysis. The second part is the main body and the core part of the thesis. The boundary divides the crime of causing traffic accident and endangering public safety by dangerous method. Firstly, it analyzes and discusses what is "dangerous method", and reveals the essence and connotation of "dangerous method". Secondly, distinguish between overconfident negligence and indirect intent, and discuss the identification of subjective guilt of the perpetrator under specific circumstances; thirdly, analyze whether the crime of traffic accident can be transformed into the crime of endangering public security by dangerous methods; finally, The essence of the theory of "secondary collision" is analyzed, and the opinion of the Supreme people's Court on the legal application of drunken driving crime is analyzed. The third part analyzes the cases, analyzes and discusses the dispute cases proposed in the first part of this paper, summarizes the boundary of the two crimes from the point of view of actual case analysis, and expresses the main purpose of the paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 于志剛;;危險(xiǎn)駕駛行為的罪刑評(píng)價(jià)——以“醉酒駕駛”交通肇事行為為視角[J];法學(xué);2009年09期

2 劉傳稿;;以危險(xiǎn)方法危害公共安全罪與交通肇事罪的區(qū)別——以胡斌飆車(chē)案為分析視角[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2009年05期

3 赫興旺;;如何認(rèn)定以危險(xiǎn)方法危害公共安全罪[J];中國(guó)公共安全(學(xué)術(shù)版);2005年Z1期

4 張明楷;;危險(xiǎn)駕駛的刑事責(zé)任[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

5 彭湛;劉錚;;從飆車(chē)案看交通肇事罪與危害公共安全罪的界定[J];湖南城市學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

本文編號(hào)：1656128