本文選題：抽象危險犯　切入點(diǎn)：危險　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：刑罰正當(dāng)化的依據(jù)是刑法學(xué)的基本問題之一，也就是說，對于任何不法行為進(jìn)行刑罰處罰都必須要有充分的理由。而抽象危險犯作為一種不需要實(shí)害結(jié)果與具體危險為構(gòu)成要件的犯罪類型，對其正當(dāng)性的考察更是必不可少，其存在邊界也必須被嚴(yán)格限定。 本文共三部分，正文3萬余字。 第一部分：抽象危險犯概述。本部分首先對危險犯的范圍、抽象危險犯中的危險進(jìn)行界定，同時對抽象危險犯、具體危險犯以及行為犯進(jìn)行區(qū)分，以此明確本文所要探討對象，即抽象危險犯的內(nèi)涵與外延。其次，通過對《刑法修正案（八）》新增與修訂的抽象危險犯立法例的立法目的進(jìn)行還原與分析得出結(jié)論：基于保障民生的需要，我國刑事立法呈現(xiàn)出擴(kuò)大抽象危險犯范圍的立法趨勢。并由此引發(fā)關(guān)于抽象危險犯正當(dāng)性的思考。 第二部分：抽象危險犯正當(dāng)性的探求。這部分主要遵循宏觀到微觀，理論到現(xiàn)實(shí)的思路。首先，從刑法價值層面對抽象危險犯設(shè)置的正當(dāng)性進(jìn)行考察，認(rèn)為抽象危險犯的設(shè)置體現(xiàn)了刑法著重秩序價值的實(shí)現(xiàn)，但結(jié)合我國具體國情分析認(rèn)為，當(dāng)前形勢下刑法應(yīng)當(dāng)更注重對自由價值的保護(hù)。其次，從刑法精神及基本原則層面對抽象危險犯設(shè)置的正當(dāng)性進(jìn)行考察，，得出抽象危險犯的設(shè)置與刑法謙抑精神以及法益侵害原則都存在著一定的沖突的結(jié)論。再次，從風(fēng)險社會這一現(xiàn)實(shí)背景出發(fā)對抽象危險犯設(shè)置的正當(dāng)性進(jìn)行考察，得出結(jié)論認(rèn)為抽象危險犯的設(shè)置在風(fēng)險防控能力上是存在疑問的，而且基于我國對違法行為二元立法規(guī)制的情況，可以考慮用行政處罰替代抽象危險犯的設(shè)置。最后，得出抽象危險犯的正當(dāng)性真正根據(jù)僅是由于我國現(xiàn)實(shí)情況下，犯罪學(xué)與刑法學(xué)并沒有實(shí)現(xiàn)分工的明確，刑法不得已的承擔(dān)了部分犯罪預(yù)防的功能，還有就是基于立法技術(shù)的考慮，抽象危險犯才有存在的必要。綜合這一部分的分析，筆者認(rèn)為，抽象危險犯的設(shè)置僅存在著有限的正當(dāng)性，并由此引出必須對其范圍進(jìn)行限定的討論。 第三部分：抽象危險犯邊界的限定。這部分主要從立法與司法兩大層面對抽象危險犯進(jìn)行限制。從立法層面來講，要求抽象危險犯的設(shè)置必需符合比例原則以及實(shí)證原則；在司法層面上，則主要是從解釋論上要求對抽象危險犯的危險必需做實(shí)質(zhì)解釋，從訴訟程序上賦予被告人反證的權(quán)利。
[Abstract]:The justification of punishment is one of the basic problems in criminal law, that is to say, There must be sufficient reasons for punishment for any illegal act. As a type of crime which does not require the result of actual harm and the concrete danger, it is necessary to investigate the legitimacy of the crime. The boundary of existence must also be strictly defined. There are three parts in this paper, the text is more than 30,000 words. The first part: an overview of abstract dangerous crime. This part first defines the scope of the dangerous crime, the risk in the abstract dangerous crime, and at the same time distinguishes the abstract dangerous crime, the specific dangerous crime and the behavior crime. In order to clarify the object of this paper, that is, the connotation and extension of abstract dangerous crime. Secondly, Through the analysis of the legislative purpose of the new and revised abstract dangerous crime legislation in the Criminal Law Amendment (8), the conclusion is drawn: based on the need to protect the people's livelihood, The criminal legislation of our country shows the legislative trend of enlarging the scope of abstract dangerous crime, which leads to thinking about the legitimacy of abstract danger crime. The second part: the exploration of the legitimacy of the abstract dangerous crime. This part mainly follows the macroscopic to the microscopic, the theory to the reality mentality. First, from the criminal law value stratification plane carries on the investigation to the abstract dangerous crime establishment legitimacy, The author thinks that the establishment of abstract dangerous crime reflects the realization of order value in criminal law, but according to the actual situation of our country, the criminal law should pay more attention to the protection of freedom value under the current situation. Secondly, From the aspect of the spirit and basic principle of criminal law, the author investigates the legitimacy of the setting of abstract dangerous crime, and draws the conclusion that the setting of abstract dangerous crime is in conflict with the modest spirit of criminal law and the principle of infringement of legal interests. Starting from the realistic background of risk society, this paper investigates the legitimacy of the establishment of abstract dangerous crime, and concludes that the setting of abstract dangerous crime is in doubt on the ability of risk prevention and control. Furthermore, based on the dualistic legislative regulation of illegal acts in our country, we can consider replacing the establishment of abstract dangerous crime with administrative punishment. Finally, we can draw the conclusion that the justification of abstract dangerous crime is only due to the actual situation in our country. Criminology and criminal law do not realize the division of labor clearly, criminal law has to bear part of the function of crime prevention, and based on the consideration of legislative technology, abstract dangerous crime has the necessity to exist. Comprehensive analysis of this part, The author believes that there is only limited legitimacy in the setting of abstract dangerous crime, which leads to the discussion that the scope must be limited. The third part: the limitation of the boundary of the abstract dangerous crime. This part mainly limits the abstract dangerous crime from the legislative and judicial levels. From the legislative level, it requires that the establishment of the abstract dangerous crime must conform to the principle of proportionality and the principle of demonstration. On the judicial level, it is mainly from the theory of interpretation that the danger of the abstract dangerous crime must be explained substantively, and the defendant has the right to testify against it from the legal procedure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高巍;;抽象危險犯的概念及正當(dāng)性基礎(chǔ)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);2007年01期

2 劉明祥;;“風(fēng)險刑法”的風(fēng)險及其控制[J];法商研究;2011年04期

3 劉艷紅;;“風(fēng)險刑法”理論不能動搖刑法謙抑主義[J];法商研究;2011年04期

4 于志剛;;“風(fēng)險刑法”不可行[J];法商研究;2011年04期

5 張明楷;;“風(fēng)險社會”若干刑法理論問題反思[J];法商研究;2011年05期

6 蘇彩霞;危險犯及其相關(guān)概念之辨析——兼評刑法分則第116條與第119條第1款之關(guān)系[J];法學(xué)評論;2001年03期

7 龍敏;;秩序與自由的碰撞——論風(fēng)險社會刑法的價值沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年05期

8 張子禮;楊春然;;論犯罪化的原則[J];河北法學(xué);2011年04期

9 陳曉明;;風(fēng)險社會之刑法應(yīng)對[J];法學(xué)研究;2009年06期

10 馬克昌;;危險社會與刑法謙抑原則[J];人民檢察;2010年03期

本文編號：1618085